Science Editing

Case Study

Accessibility, language, discipline, and indexing status of university journals that use Open Journal Systems in Indonesia: a case study: Maria Lamury, John Willinsky; Sci Ed. 2025;12(2):190-196. Published online April 30, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.367

2,341 View
61 Download

Abstract PDF: This case study examines the characteristics of university journals in Indonesia on the country’s most used platform, Open Journal Systems (OJS), following a decade of rapid growth in scholarly publishing. A sample of 558 journals, published by 93 Indonesian universities, was analyzed with a focus on four main aspects: accessibility, language, academic discipline, and indexing status. Based on OJS Beacon data, 96.7% of the journals offer free public access without requiring a login. Among the 539 open access journals in the sample, 51.8% were published in Indonesian, 28.5% in English, and 16.3% were bilingual. The most common academic disciplines include commerce, management, tourism and service, and studies of human society. National indexing services reveal that 78.9% are listed in Garuda, 25.2% possess Arjuna accreditation, and only 5.4% are ranked as Science and Technology Index (SINTA) 1 or 2. While 95.7% are indexed in Google Scholar, only one journal is found in Scopus and none in Web of Science. These findings highlight the influence of government policies on open access publishing and underscore ongoing efforts to balance national language usage with global academic communication. This comprehensive analysis provides insights into the evolving landscape of scholarly communication in Indonesia and informs future policy developments and international collaboration.

Original Articles

Vietnamese researchers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding open access publishing: a cross-sectional study: Trung Thanh Nguyen, Ngoc Thi Bich Tran, Thai Binh An Nguyen, Huong Giang Bui, Hiep Hung Pham; Sci Ed. 2025;12(2):103-108. Published online April 2, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.364

2,132 View
86 Download

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Purpose
This study aimed to explore Vietnamese researchers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding open access (OA) publishing.
Methods
A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between May and July 2024, gathering responses from 238 Vietnamese researchers across diverse universities and disciplines. Descriptive statistical analyses were used to identify key trends in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors among different demographic groups.
Results
Vietnamese researchers primarily acquired information about OA through websites and colleagues, with ScienceOpen, PLOS, and SSRN serving as the main sources. Although they valued OA for its accessibility and broad dissemination, they expressed concerns regarding high publication fees and the quality of OA journals—particularly issues related to peer review rigor and potential risks to academic reputation.
Conclusion
The findings indicate strong support for OA publishing among Vietnamese researchers, despite ongoing concerns about high costs, journal credibility, and insufficient institutional support. Strengthening funding models, institutional advocacy, and quality assurance mechanisms is essential for building trust in OA and fostering a more inclusive scholarly environment.

Copyright policies of science and engineering open access journals indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded or Scopus, published by Korean academic societies: Dae Un Hong, Ju Yoen Lee; Sci Ed. 2024;11(1):62-72. Published online February 20, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.330; Correction in: Sci Ed 2025;12(1):89

5,860 View
165 Download
1 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
This article explores the challenges related to copyright policies in the context of science and engineering open access (OA) journals based in Korea.
Methods
From Korea Citation Index (KCI)-listed science and engineering journals in English indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) or Scopus, 162 journals were identified as of January 10, 2024. Of these, 104 were published independently by Korean academic societies. All were open access. Data were collected from the KCI database and verified via each journal’s website. Discrepancies were resolved using the journal website information.
Results
The English-language science and engineering OA journals published independently by Korean academic societies typically exhibit three common characteristics regarding their copyright and licensing policies. First, authors are generally required to transfer their copyrights. Second, the Creative Commons (CC) license terms are predominantly BY-NC (Attribution-NonCommercial), without providing authors the option to select alternative licensing terms. Third, the journals do not sufficiently protect the rights of the authors. From the analyses presented herein, it is evident that the current copyright and licensing policies of Korea’s English-language science and engineering OA journals lack a robust structure.
Conclusion
These policies need to be revised to allow authors to retain copyright and require them to consent for the CC license terms it adopts, in order to align with the common practice among OA journals. Furthermore, to better protect authors’ rights, it would be beneficial to permit authors to choose the specific terms of the CC license for their articles.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Correction to “Copyright policies of science and engineering open access journals indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded or Scopus, published by Korean academic societies”

Science Editing.2025; 12(1): 89. CrossRef

Impact factor surge in Korean medical journals during the COVID-19 era: a bibliometric study: Chansu Park, Sejin Park, Hyeonseok Seo, Janghyeog Oh, Dongryeong Kim, Junha Kang, Hanul Kang, Hyunsung Kang, Yaechan Kim, Mi Ah Han; Sci Ed. 2024;11(1):55-61. Published online December 18, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.320

6,597 View
128 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
The multiyear COVID-19 pandemic has affected the volume and speed of publications in scientific journals. This study evaluated trends in the impact measures of international medical journals published in Korea, including the journal impact factor (JIF).
Methods
We selected Science Citation Index Expanded journals with the country/region set to Korea and the academic category classified as “clinical medicine” in Journal Citation Reports. Trends in indicators such as the JIF and Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) were assessed for journals with JIF information from 2018 to 2022. Ratios and differences between the measures were calculated to determine the extent of the change.
Results
We identified 43 journals, and the average JIF of those journals increased from 2.33 in 2018 and 2.50 in 2019 to 3.45 in 2020 and 3.86 in 2021. Other measures, such as the 5-year JIF and JCI, steadily increased, and the proportion of gold open access journals also increased significantly. However, the JCI and Eigenfactor scores remained steady or showed relatively small increases. Furthermore, impact measures declined in 2022, including a JIF decrease to 3.55.
Conclusion
We presented trends in quantitative measurements for international medical journals in Korea, and found an overall increase. Journals need to maintain a rigorous publication process to improve the quality of their research and the research community needs to exercise caution when using quantitative measures to evaluate journals. Further research is required to examine the quantitative indicators of journals, including their publication policies, research topics, and long-term trends.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Scientific Publication Speed of Korean Medical Journals during the COVID-19 Era
Hyeonseok Seo, Yaechan Kim, Dongryeong Kim, Hanul Kang, Chansu Park, Sejin Park, Junha Kang, Janghyeog Oh, Hyunsung Kang, Mi Ah Han
Healthcare Informatics Research.2024; 30(3): 277. CrossRef

Publishing trends of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports during the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive study: Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park; Sci Ed. 2023;10(1):78-86. Published online February 16, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.300

7,083 View
289 Download
4 Web of Science
5 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the changes that occurred in journal and article publishing during the noncontact period that started in 2020 due to COVID-19.
Methods
The integrated journal list in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2017–2021 and the search results of Web of Science were analyzed using pivot tables in Microsoft Excel. The articles, citations, impact factor (IF), publishers, open access (OA) status, and compound annual growth rate (CAGR) were investigated using the data.
Results
The CAGRs of articles, citations, and IFs in JCR journals increased throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, the increase in OA articles was accompanied by a decreasing share of subscription articles. The top 20 journals in JCR-SCIE (Science Citation Index Expanded), based on the number of articles, accepted OA policies and showed a strong influence, accounting for 7% to 9% of all articles. MDPI and Frontiers were OA publishers included among the top 10 publishers. Large publishers maintained their competitiveness through mergers and acquisitions with OA publishers. Due to the rapid distribution of OA and early access articles as part of the international response to overcome COVID-19, the CAGRs of citations and IFs increased more than that of articles, and the publication and use of journal articles have become more active.
Conclusion
The publication and use trends in JCR journals analyzed herein will provide useful information for researchers’ selection of journals for article submission, analyses of research performance, and libraries’ journal subscription contracts.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology’s number of articles and turnaround time before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study
Sang-Jun Kim
Science Editing.2025; 12(1): 50. CrossRef
Understanding long-term immunity to COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a bibliometric study of IgG antibody
Imam NURJAYA, Erwin ARIEF, Nur A. TABRI, Irawaty DJAHARUDDIN, Bulkis NATSIR, Sitti NURISYAH, Rasiha RASIHA
Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review
Sang-Jun Kim
Science Editing.2024; 11(2): 96. CrossRef
Explosive increase and decrease in articles, citations, impact factor, and immediacy index during the COVID-19 pandemic: a bibliometric study
Sang-Jun Kim
Science Editing.2024; 11(2): 107. CrossRef
Trends in research on ChatGPT and adoption-related issues discussed in articles: a narrative review
Sang-Jun Kim
Science Editing.2023; 11(1): 3. CrossRef

Changes in the absolute numbers and proportions of open access articles from 2000 to 2021 based on the Web of Science Core Collection: a bibliometric study: Jeong-Wook Seo; Sci Ed. 2023;10(1):45-56. Published online February 16, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.296

8,610 View
304 Download
2 Web of Science
2 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
The ultimate goal of current open access (OA) initiatives is for library services to use OA resources. This study aimed to assess the infrastructure for OA scholarly information services by tabulating the number and proportion of OA articles in a literature database.
Methods
We measured the absolute numbers and proportions of OA articles at different time points across various disciplines based on the Web of Science (WoS) database.
Results
The number (proportion) of available OA articles between 2000 and 2021 in the WoS database was 12 million (32.4%). The number (proportion) of indexed OA articles in 1 year was 0.15 million (14.6%) in 2000 and 1.5 million (48.0%) in 2021. The proportion of OA by subject categories in the cumulative data was the highest in the multidisciplinary category (2000–2021, 79%; 2021, 89%), high in natural sciences (2000–2021, 21%–46%; 2021, 41%–62%) and health and medicine (2000–2021, 37%–40%; 2021, 52%–60%), and low in social sciences and others (2000–2021, 23%–32%; 2021, 36%–44%), engineering (2000–2021, 17%–33%; 2021, 31%–39%) and humanities and arts (2000–2021, 11%–22%; 2021, 28%–38%).
Conclusion
Our study confirmed that increasingly many OA research papers have been published in the last 20 years, and the recent data show considerable promise for better services in the future. The proportions of OA articles differed among scholarly disciplines, and designing library services necessitates several considerations with regard to the customers’ demands, available OA resources, and strategic approaches to encourage the use of scholarly OA articles.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A guide for structured literature reviews in business research: The state-of-the-art and how to integrate generative artificial intelligence
Fabian Tingelhoff, Micha Brugger, Jan Marco Leimeister
Journal of Information Technology.2025; 40(1): 77. CrossRef
KI-Tools für die wissenschaftliche Literaturrecherche: Potenziale, Problematiken, Didaktik und Zukunftsperspektiven
Miriam Lahrsow
Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis.2025; 49(2): 230. CrossRef

How open access diamond journals comply with industry standards exemplified by Plan S technical requirements: Korean Council of Science Editors; Sci Ed. 2023;10(1):35-44. Published online February 16, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.295

7,282 View
306 Download
1 Web of Science

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Purpose
This study investigated how well current open access (OA) diamond journals in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and a survey conform to Plan S requirements, including licenses, peer review, author copyright, unique article identifiers, digital archiving, and machine-readable licenses.
Methods
Data obtained from DOAJ journals and surveyed journals from mid-June to mid-July 2020 were analyzed for a variety of Plan S requirements. The results were presented using descriptive statistics.
Results
Out of 1,465 journals that answered, 1,137 (77.0%) reported compliance with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) principles. The peer review types used by OA diamond journals were double-blind (6,339), blind (2,070), peer review (not otherwise specified, 1,879), open peer review (42), and editorial review (118) out of 10,449 DOAJ journals. An author copyright retention policy was adopted by 5,090 out of 10,448 OA diamond journals (48.7%) in DOAJ. Of the unique article identifiers, 5,702 (54.6%) were digital object identifiers, 58 (0.6%) were handles, and 14 (0.1%) were uniform resource names, while 4,675 (44.7%) used none. Out of 1,619 surveyed journals, the archiving solutions were national libraries (n=170, 10.5%), Portico (n=67, 4.1%), PubMed Central (n=15, 0.9%), PKP PN (n=91, 5.6%), LOCKSS (n=136, 8.4%), CLOCKSS (n=87, 5.4%), the National Computing Center for Higher Education (n=6, 0.3%), others (n=69, 4.3%), no policy (n=855, 52.8%), and no reply (n=123, 7.6%). Article-level metadata deposition was done by 8,145 out of 10,449 OA diamond journals (78.0%) in DOAJ.
Conclusion
OA diamond journals’ compliance with industry standards exemplified by the Plan S technical requirements was insufficient, except for the peer review type.

Charting variety, scope, and impact of open access diamond journals in various disciplines and regions: a survey-based observational study: Korean Council of Science Editors; Sci Ed. 2022;9(2):120-135. Published online August 19, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.277

9,149 View
336 Download
6 Web of Science
6 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
The variety, scope, and impact of open access (OA) diamond journals across disciplines and regions from July 22 to September 11, 2020 were charted to characterize the current OA diamond landscape.
Methods
The total number of diamond journals was estimated, including those outside the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). The distribution across regions, disciplines, and publisher types was described. The scope of journals in terms of authorship and readership was investigated. Information was collected on linguistic diversity, journal dynamics and life cycle, and their visibility in scholarly databases.
Results
The number of OA diamond journals is estimated to be 29,000. OA diamond journals are estimated to publish 356,000 articles per year. The OA diamond sector is diverse in terms of regions (45% in Europe, 25% in Latin America, 16% in Asia, and 5% in the United States/Canada) and disciplines (60% humanities and social sciences, 22% sciences, and 17% medicine). More than 70% of OA diamond journals are published by university-owned publishers, including university presses. The majority of OA diamond journals are small, publishing fewer than 25 articles a year. English (1,210), Spanish (492), and French (342) are the most common languages of the main texts. Out of 1,619 journals, 1,025 (63.3%) are indexed in DOAJ, 492 (30.4%) in Scopus, and 321 (19.8%) in Web of Science.
Conclusion
The patterns and trends reported herein provide insights into the diversity and importance of the OA diamond journal landscape and the accompanying opportunities and challenges in supporting this publishing model.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Awareness and perception of Diamond Open Access among university professors in Iran
A. Subaveerapandiyan, Leili Seifi, Somipam R Shimray, Naved Ahmad
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Citation Metrics of Open Access and Subscription Journals in Education: An Analysis in Scopus’s Education Category
Camila Lopes Ferreira, Luiz Alberto Pilatti, José Roberto Herrera Cantorani, Claudia Tania Picinin
Education for Information.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Journal metrics, document network, and conceptual and social structures of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology from 2017 to July 2022: a bibliometric study
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2023; 76(1): 3. CrossRef
How open access diamond journals comply with industry standards exemplified by Plan S technical requirements

Science Editing.2023; 10(1): 35. CrossRef
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions received the Journal Impact Factor, 4.4 for the first time on June 28, 2023
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 21. CrossRef
Plan S: estimating future developments
Johan Rooryck
Science Editing.2022; 9(2): 149. CrossRef

Changes in article share and growth by publisher and access type in Journal Citation Reports 2016, 2018, and 2020: Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park; Sci Ed. 2022;9(1):30-36. Published online February 20, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.260

8,105 View
298 Download
6 Web of Science
6 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
This study explored changes in the journal publishing market by publisher and access type using the major journals that publish about 95% of Journal Citation Reports (JCR) articles.
Methods
From JCR 2016, 2018, and 2020, a unique journal list by publisher was created in Excel and used to analyze the compound annual growth rate by pivot tables. In total, 10,953 major JCR journals were analyzed, focusing on publisher type, open access (OA) status, and mega journals (publishing over 1,000 articles per year).
Results
Among the 19 publishers that published over 10,000 articles per year, in JCR 2020, six large publishers published 59.6% of the articles and 13 publishers 22.5%. The other publishers published 17.9%. Large and OA publishers increased their article share through leading mega journals, but the remaining publishers showed the opposite tendency. In JCR 2020, mega journals had a 26.5% article share and an excellent distribution in terms of the Journal Impact Factor quartile. Despite the high growth (22.6%) and share (26.0%) of OA articles, the natural growth of non-OA articles (7.3%) and total articles (10.7%) caused a rise in journal subscription fees. Articles, citations, the impact factor, and the immediacy index all increased gradually, and the compound annual growth rate of the average immediacy index was almost double than that of the average impact factor in JCR 2020.
Conclusion
The influence of OA publishers has grown under the dominance of large publishers, and mega journals may substantially change the journal market. Journal stakeholders should pay attention to these changes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The influence of multidisciplinary mega-journals on the Journal Impact Factor: Discipline, country/region, category, JIF quartile, and journal
Jing Li, Dengsheng Wu, Xinxin Chen
Data and Information Management.2026; 10(1): 100112. CrossRef
Does Publisher Volume Matter? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Scopus Journal Publishing Patterns
Eungi Kim
Publications.2025; 13(2): 17. CrossRef
Trends in Open Access Publishing With a Special Emphasis on MDPI (2018-2022)
Marek Kosmulski
Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información.2025; 39(104): 29. CrossRef
Mapping the publisher types and collaborations behind Web of Science indexed journals
Zehra Taşkın, Janne Pölönen, Emanuel Kulczycki, Mikael Laakso
Quantitative Science Studies.2025; 6: 940. CrossRef
Publishing trends of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports during the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive study
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Science Editing.2023; 10(1): 78. CrossRef
Citation beneficiaries of discipline-specific mega-journals: who and how much
Jing Li, Qiushuang Long, Xiaoli Lu, Dengsheng Wu
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.2023;[Epub] CrossRef

Influence of open access journals on the research community in Journal Citation Reports: Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park; Sci Ed. 2021;8(1):32-38. Published online February 20, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.227

16,492 View
175 Download
7 Web of Science
6 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
The number of open access (OA) journals is rapidly increasing, and it is very important for librarians to understand the influence of OA journals on the research community. This study investigated the influence of the OA journals listed in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) based on various indicators.
Methods
The data for this study were prepared by combining the JCR 2014 to 2019 journal list with the number of hybrid OA articles obtained by searching the Web of Science. Each journal’s JCR indicators and article processing charge were added. The influence of OA journals was compared according to OA type, whether they were published by large publishers, and whether they were top gold OA journals.
Results
Gold OA journals remained weaker in terms of JCR indicators than hybrid journals. However, the top 20 gold OA journals, accounting for 27.0% of all OA articles in JCR 2014 to 2019, were superior in all JCR indicators. The top three OA publishers (MDPI, BioMed Central, and Public Library of Science) showed potential for development despite concerns regarding poor journals. The top three subscription publishers were very active in OA publishing, but their actual share of hybrid OA articles (Elsevier, 5.1%; Springer, 10.1%; and Wiley, 12.4% in JCR 2019) was still insufficient.
Conclusion
Some gold OA journals showed high competitiveness and even the possibility for development beyond traditional journals. The transition of subscription journals to hybrid journals was found to be at the early stage. In light of these findings, librarians should continue monitoring the influence of OA journals.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Mapping trends and analyzing key themes in low-cost sensors for air quality monitoring
Kemal Maulana Alhasa, Hernani Yulinawati, Deni Kurnia, Heru Dwi Wahyono, Satmoko Yudo, Irwan Kustianto, Dodi Rusjadi Tatang Endi
Earth Science Informatics.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
A decade of changes in OA and non-OA journal publication and production
Eungi Kim, Madhu Sudhan Atteraya
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.2024; 56(4): 978. CrossRef
Publishing trends of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports during the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive study
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Science Editing.2023; 10(1): 78. CrossRef
Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review
Ángel Borrego
Learned Publishing.2023; 36(3): 359. CrossRef
Changes in article share and growth by publisher and access type in Journal Citation Reports 2016, 2018, and 2020
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 30. CrossRef
The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20. CrossRef

Open access status of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports: Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park; Sci Ed. 2021;8(1):26-31. Published online February 20, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.226

8,080 View
157 Download
4 Web of Science
5 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
There is somewhat of a difference between understanding the open access (OA) concept and practicing it by stakeholders. OA articles are mainly published by gold and hybrid OA journals, but the OA status may be confusing depending on the target databases. This study investigated the OA status of journals and articles and evaluated the extent to which OA2020 (publishing 90% of articles as OA) was achieved.
Methods
This study collected OA data by combining 2014-2019 data from Journal Citation Reports at the journal level with Web of Science at the article level. Finally, 12,449 journals were analyzed focusing on gold and hybrid OA journals, and progress towards the goal of OA2020 was evaluated.
Results
Even though 80.4% of Journal Citation Reports journals were gold and hybrid OA journals, only 20.9% of the articles were OA (gold OA journals, 16.6%; hybrid journals, 4.3%). The compound annual growth rate of the total articles was 4.7%, that of OA articles was 16.4%, and that of subscription articles was only 1.7%. Among the subscription journals, 77.4% had shifted to become hybrid journals, but only 5.2% of their articles were OA. Therefore, the hybrid journals were at the very early stage of OA publishing.
Conclusion
Considerable progress must still be made to achieve the goal of OA2020. The influence of OA publishing will eventually expand and therefore, librarians should take interest in OA publishing for the library services.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Scientific publishing in the Republic of Macedonia analysed with artificial intelligence
Mirko Spiroski, Ivo Spiroski
Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences.2024; 3(1): 1. CrossRef
Publishing trends of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports during the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive study
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Science Editing.2023; 10(1): 78. CrossRef
Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review
Ángel Borrego
Learned Publishing.2023; 36(3): 359. CrossRef
Changes in article share and growth by publisher and access type in Journal Citation Reports 2016, 2018, and 2020
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 30. CrossRef
Influence of open access journals on the research community in Journal Citation Reports
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 32. CrossRef

Case Study

Proposal for the development of a national open access database in Vietnam and comparison with other Asian countries’ national literature databases: Loc My Thi Nguyen, Tien-Trung Nguyen, Thanh Thi Nghiem, Hien Thu Thi Le, Thao Phuong Thi Trinh, Thuan Van Pham, Thanh Chi Nguyen, Linh Khanh Hoang, Trung Tran; Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):55-60. Published online February 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.190

65,535 View
134 Download
3 Web of Science
4 Crossref

Abstract PDF

In the context of the need to ensure appropriate signalling of the publication of high-quality, international-calibre publications in Vietnam, as well as new policies to improve the quality and effectiveness of scientific research in Vietnam, it is practical to investigate the possibility of developing a national open access database (NOAD). This study aims to answer the question of whether it is necessary to establish a NOAD in Vietnam. We used document analysis to evaluate issues related to NOADs. The results of this study show the complexity, lack of consistency, and difficulty in obtaining practical statistics and assessing research and scientific records in Vietnam today. Furthermore, the findings of this study imply that it is necessary to establish a NOAD of scientific research in Vietnam. The information in this report can be used to develop a NOAD for Vietnam in particular, and for any country that lacks one in general.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Vietnamese researchers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding open access publishing: a cross-sectional study
Trung Thanh Nguyen, Ngoc Thi Bich Tran, Thai Binh An Nguyen, Huong Giang Bui, Hiep Hung Pham
Science Editing.2025; 12(2): 103. CrossRef
A spike in the scientific output on social sciences in Vietnam for recent three years: Evidence from bibliometric analysis in Scopus database (2000–2019)
Binh Pham-Duc, Trung Tran, Thao-Phuong-Thi Trinh, Tien-Trung Nguyen, Ngoc-Trang Nguyen, Hien-Thu-Thi Le
Journal of Information Science.2022; 48(5): 623. CrossRef
Research on Industry 4.0 and on key related technologies in Vietnam: A bibliometric analysis using Scopus
Binh Pham‐Duc, Trung Tran, Hien‐Thu‐Thi Le, Nhi‐Thi Nguyen, Ha‐Thi Cao, Tien‐Trung Nguyen
Learned Publishing.2021; 34(3): 414. CrossRef
Comparative Analysis of National and International Educational Science Articles in Vietnam: Evidence from the Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion Structure
Thao Phuong Thi Trinh, Trung Tran, Tien-Trung Nguyen, Thanh Thi Nghiem, Nam Nguyen Danh
European Journal of Educational Research.2020; volume-9-2(volume-9-i): 1367. CrossRef

Original Article

Status of digital standards, licensing types, and archiving policies in Asian open access journals registered in Directory of Open Access Journals: Soon Kim, Hyungwook Choi; Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):41-46. Published online February 20, 2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.154

10,312 View
171 Download
5 Web of Science
6 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
This study aims to analyze the digital standards of Asian journals registered in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) which has been recognized as an index of quality for open access journals.
Methods
Data including 54 fields of each journal listed in DOAJ were provided by the DOAJ team in June 5, 2018. We focused on 11 fields including digital standards, content licensing types and digital archiving policy.
Results
Based on raw data from DOAJ from June 5, 2018, there are 11,534 journals registered in the directory. Among all journals in the directory, Asian journals comprise 1,972 journals from 18 countries. Indonesian journals rank at the top for Asian journals, with 1,322 journals originating from that country. Other major Asian countries’ registration status includes India (238), South Korea (82), China (80), Malaysia (45), Pakistan (39), Taiwan (30), Thailand (27), Japan (20), and Hong Kong (20). Eighty percent of journals (1,584) are using PDF-only as their full-text format, and DOI is adopted in 852 journals (43%). Almost 98% of journals (1,936) are having a Creative Commons license; however, 85% of journals (1,689) do not have a digital archiving policy.
Conclusion
Generally, digital standards are well implemented in South Korea, and digital archiving/deposit policy is well accepted in Indian journals. Many Asian open access journal editors can refer to this study result when they digitalize their journals in order to meet global standards.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Perceptions of the Pakistani editors for open access journal publishing: a developing country’s perspective
Muhammad Zahid Raza, Muhammad Rafiq, Saira Hanif Soroya
Information Development.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The COPE / DOAJ / OASPA / WAME Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: A Critical Analysis
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Salim Moussa
ETHICS IN PROGRESS.2024; 15(1): 130. CrossRef
Türkiye'de Açık Dergi Sistemlerinde Yayımlanan Kütüphane ve Bilgi Bilim Dergilerinin Dijital Koruma Durumu: Fatcat Tabanlı Bir Analiz
Kemal Yayla
Bilgi Yönetimi.2024; 7(2): 252. CrossRef
Digital Archiving Policies of Central European Journals Registered in the Directory of Open Access Journals
Branka Marijanović, Hrvoje Stančić
Libri.2023; 73(1): 11. CrossRef
Open-source code to convert Journal Article Tag Suite Extensible Markup Language (JATS XML) to various viewers and other XML types for scholarly journal publishing
Younsang Cho
Science Editing.2022; 9(2): 162. CrossRef
Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in academic society published journals
Hyung Wook Choi, Ye Jin Choi, Soon Kim
Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 112. CrossRef

Reviews

Open access full-text databases in Asian countries: Tae-Sul Seo; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):26-31. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.114

13,249 View
257 Download
9 Web of Science
8 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Open access promotion methods are generally divided into the ‘gold road’ and the ‘green road.’ Asian countries most commonly focus on the gold road while others focus on the green road. According to data from the Directory of Open Access Journal and the Directory of Open Access Repositories, Indonesia has the largest number of open access journals in the world, while Japan has the third largest number of institutional repositories. In contrast, in Korea, the extensible markup language services of the original text of journal articles are more popular than other Asian countries. In this article, the current status of open access in Asian countries is investigated, and typical open access journal service platforms in Asian countries are reviewed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The promotion of university journals published by Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia, from 2018 to 2024: a descriptive study
Eko Didik Widianto, Hadiyanto, Teddy Mantoro, Raka Sindu Wardoyo
Science Editing.2025; 12(1): 43. CrossRef
Open access theses and dissertations: current status and perspectives
Nadim Akhtar Khan, S.M. Shafi
Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Open access initiatives in European countries: analysis of trends and policies
Mohammad Nazim, Raj Kumar Bhardwaj
Digital Library Perspectives.2023; 39(3): 371. CrossRef
Proposal for the development of a national open access database in Vietnam and comparison with other Asian countries’ national literature databases
Loc My Thi Nguyen, Tien-Trung Nguyen, Thanh Thi Nghiem, Hien Thu Thi Le, Thao Phuong Thi Trinh, Thuan Van Pham, Thanh Chi Nguyen, Linh Khanh Hoang, Trung Tran
Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 55. CrossRef
Otwarty dostęp w krajach globalnego Południa
Małgorzata Glinicka
Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej - Studia Informacyjne.2020; 58(1(115)): 56. CrossRef
CJK Languages or English: Languages Used by Academic Journals in China, Japan, and Korea
Xiaomei Liu, Xiaotian Chen
Journal of Scholarly Publishing.2019; 50(3): 201. CrossRef
Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools
Armen Yuri Gasparyan, Marlen Yessirkepov, Alexander A. Voronov, Anna M. Koroleva, George D. Kitas
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Latest trends in innovative global scholarly journal publication and distribution platforms
Soon Kim, Eunkyung Chung, Jae Yun Lee
Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 100. CrossRef

Equality, equity, and reality of open access on scholarly information: Jeong-Wook Seo, Hosik Chung, Tae-Sul Seo, Youngim Jung, Eun Seong Hwang, Cheol-Heui Yun, Hyungsun Kim; Sci Ed. 2017;4(2):58-69. Published online August 16, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.97; Correction in: Sci Ed 2018;5(2):171

21,789 View
253 Download
7 Web of Science
7 Crossref

Abstract PDF

The current statistic data on the open access (OA) journals and institutional repositories show some successes and increased awareness on OA in Asian countries. There are several concerns, however, in regards to the access and use of articles by researchers together with the continued increase of libraries’ expenditure for journals. In the present article we introduce five solutions in the global and local perspectives. OA2020 initiative is a global initiative to transform existing journals to OA. Although the practical process of OA2020 remains a challenge, the transformation will increase OA without significant increase of journals and budgets for publishing. The promotion of the local and Asian journals is the second big challenge. Because these local or Asian journals still have important roles in the local research community, they should keep current publishing model of OA at the low cost but with high quality and the better access. The restructuring of the current library budget is the third challenge. The budget for periodicals should be reduced and the saved budget can be used to pay articles processing charge for OA and for purchasing monographs. The fourth important issue is ‘the digital blind spot at the young unemployed and retired elderly’. These groups of poorly supported and potentially important researchers have to be considered as a priority issue to the policies on OA and scholarly knowledge. Lastly, we believe there should be different needs for other activities: optimization of the searchable database, governmental policy on open science and international cooperation on OA.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Inequity, precarity, and disparity: Exploring systemic and institutional barriers in open access publishing
Philips Ayeni, Vincent Larivière
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Changes in the absolute numbers and proportions of open access articles from 2000 to 2021 based on the Web of Science Core Collection: a bibliometric study
Jeong-Wook Seo
Science Editing.2023; 10(1): 45. CrossRef
“I Am in a Privileged Situation”: Examining the Factors Promoting Inequity in Open Access Publishing
Philips Ayeni
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2023; 60(1): 521. CrossRef
El acceso al conocimiento un derecho universal: las implicaciones sobre la gobernanza de ecosistemas de acceso abierto
Wilson López López
Universitas Psychologica.2019; 18(5): 1. CrossRef
Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
Sun Huh
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137. CrossRef
Why and how do we keep editing local medical journals in an era of information overload?
Viera Wardhani, Sam Mathew, Jeong-Wook Seo, Komang G. Wiryawan, Vivi Setiawaty, Burmaajav Badrakh
Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 150. CrossRef
Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
Sun Huh
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524. CrossRef

Case Study

Analysis of visits to ScienceCentral, an open access full-text archive of scientific society journal literature: Younsang Cho, Sun Huh; Sci Ed. 2017;4(1):30-33. Published online February 20, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.86

12,214 View
165 Download
2 Web of Science
2 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

ScienceCentral is a free or open access full-text archive of scientific society journal literature hosted by the Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies. It was launched in December 2013. We analyzed the number of articles deposited, page views by period, country of visitors, number of visitors, and entry point of visits. Descriptive statistics were presented. We also hypothesized that visitors accessed ScienceCentral mostly through Google and Google Scholar since ScienceCentral allows Googlebot to index it. The number of deposited articles was 19,419 from 124 journals in December 2016. The number of page views per month was 20,228 in December 2016. The top countries of visitors were South Korea (39.9%), the United States (13.26%), India (4.2%), China (3.4%), and Russia (3.2%). The average number of page views per article a month in December 2016 was 1.0. Google and Google Scholar were powerful referral sites to ScienceCentral. Except for direct visits to ScienceCentral, seven out of the top ten access sites to ScienceCentral were Google or Google Scholar sites from a variety of countries. Although the number of visitors and page views has increased continuously, the average number of page views per article a month has not increased.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The rapid internationalization of Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism as evidenced by journal metrics
Sun Huh
Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism.2017; 22(2): 77. CrossRef
How to Deal with Ethical Issues Involving Animal Experiments and Identifiable Photographs in Articles Published in Archives of Plastic Surgery
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2017; 44(06): 475. CrossRef

Review

Quality open access publishing and registration to Directory of Open Access Journals: Xin Bi; Sci Ed. 2017;4(1):3-11. Published online February 20, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.82

23,097 View
331 Download
12 Web of Science
11 Crossref

Abstract PDF

With the fast development of open access publishing worldwide, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) as a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals, has been recognized for its high criteria in facilitating high quality open access scholarly publishing and used as the portal for accessing quality open access journals. While the numbers of journal application to be inclusion in DOAJ in Asia are kept increasing dramatically, many editors of these journals are not very clear about the idea or concept of the open access which have been embedded in the application form containing 58 questions falling into several different criteria categories. The very commonly seen misunderstanding of the required item, inaccurate or vague or incomplete and even missing information, poorly organized website, non-transparent process of publishing, especially no open access statement and copyright statement, or conflicts between the policy statements would cause much more communication between the reviewer and the editor and delay the completion of the review. This article gives an in depth introduction to DOAJ criteria and detailed introduction to the general process on how to register to DOAJ, suggestions based on application review also is given for journal editors to better prepare for this application. And it is the most important for editors to keep in mind that to be indexed by DOAJ is not just about filling a form, it is about truly change and adapt to best practices in open access publishing.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Ewha Medical Journal passed the scientific evaluation by PubMed Central and succeeded in being included in DOAJ, but failed to be accepted by Scopus
Sun Huh
Ewha Medical Journal.2025; 48(2): e21. CrossRef
Mapping the open access publications of Indian non-profit organizations over the last 20 years based on OpenAlex insights
Rima Hazarika, Abhijit Roy, K.G. Sudhier
Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
An Altmetrics and citation analysis of selected predatory journals in library and information science field
Ming Chen, Linzi Wang
The Journal of Academic Librarianship.2022; 48(6): 102618. CrossRef
Examining the Research Evolution on the Socio-Economic and Environmental Dimensions on University Social Responsibility
Víctor Meseguer-Sánchez, Emilio Abad-Segura, Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña, Valentín Molina-Moreno
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(13): 4729. CrossRef
Mapping the Current Research Agenda on Scholarly Publishing: Scopus-Indexed Reviews
Elena Tikhonova, Lilia Raitskaya
Journal of Language and Education.2020; 6(4): 4. CrossRef
Challenge of Ukrainian academic librarians in an evolving scholarly publishing landscape
Serhii Nazarovets, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Maryna Nazarovets
The Journal of Academic Librarianship.2019; 45(1): 9. CrossRef
Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools
Armen Yuri Gasparyan, Marlen Yessirkepov, Alexander A. Voronov, Anna M. Koroleva, George D. Kitas
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
The DOAJ Spring Cleaning 2016 and What Was Removed—Tragic Loss or Good Riddance?
Jan Erik Frantsvåg
Publications.2019; 7(3): 45. CrossRef
How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
Sun Huh
Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95. CrossRef
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research's promotion to internationally competitive journal evidenced by journal metrics
Sun Huh
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research.2017; 6(2): 67. CrossRef
Equality, equity, and reality of open access on scholarly information
Jeong-Wook Seo, Hosik Chung, Tae-Sul Seo, Youngim Jung, Eun Seong Hwang, Cheol-Heui Yun, Hyungsun Kim
Science Editing.2017; 4(2): 58. CrossRef

Original Articles

Status of digital standards in Korean medical journals in 2016: Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh; Sci Ed. 2016;3(2):100-104. Published online August 20, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.73

13,185 View
155 Download
13 Web of Science
14 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

This study aimed to characterize the current status of a variety of digital standards in medical journals published in Korea in 2016. A total of 256 journals listed as member journals of the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors were searched to evaluate the following items: an independent journal homepage domain; an e-submission system; the use of digital object identifiers (DOIs), CrossMark, and FundRef; the availability of text and data mining; the presence of Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) information, an open access declaration, and the language of the journal. The search was carried out from July 29 to 30, 2016. Independent journal homepage domains were found for 190 of the 256 journals (74.1%). Of the journals, 216 were equipped with an e-submission system (84.4%), and 218 journals used DOIs (85.2%). CrossMark and FundRef were used in 105 journals (41.0%), text and data mining were available for 31 journals (11.1%), ORCID identifiers were present in 24 journals (9.4%), and an open access declaration according to a Creative Commons license was present for 199 journals (77.8%). The number of English-language journals was 130 (50.8%). Open access journals and English-language journals were found to have implemented more digital standards than non-open access journals and Korean-language journals respectively. The above results demonstrate that digital standards have been rapidly implemented by a considerable number of medical journals in Korea. In order to facilitate the more active promotion of journals to the international level, more journals should utilize these standards. The use of full-text JATS (journal article tag suite) XML is recommended for the easy adoption of DOIs, CrossMark, FundRef, and ORCID.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Medical and health sciences academics’ behaviours and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals: a perspective from South Korea
Kyoung Hee Joung, Jennifer Rowley, Laura Sbaffi
Information Development.2019; 35(2): 191. CrossRef
Is it possible to foster first-rate publishers through a journal publishing cooperative in Korea?
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(01): 3. CrossRef
Bronze, free, or fourrée: an open access commentary
Eamon Costello
Science Editing.2019; 6(1): 69. CrossRef
Status of digital standards, licensing types, and archiving policies in Asian open access journals registered in Directory of Open Access Journals
Soon Kim, Hyungwook Choi
Science Editing.2019; 6(1): 41. CrossRef
How many retracted articles indexed in KoreaMed were cited 1 year after retraction notification
Soo Young Kim, Hyun Jung Yi, Hye-Min Cho, Sun Huh
Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 122. CrossRef
How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
Sun Huh
Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95. CrossRef
Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
Sun Huh
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137. CrossRef
Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
Sun Huh
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524. CrossRef
Is Diabetes & Metabolism Journal Eligible to Be Indexed in MEDLINE?
Sun Huh
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal.2018; 42(6): 472. CrossRef
The great rise ofIntestinal Researchas an international journal 3 years after its language change to English as evidenced by journal metrics
Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
Intestinal Research.2017; 15(1): 1. CrossRef
The rapid internationalization of Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism as evidenced by journal metrics
Sun Huh
Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism.2017; 22(2): 77. CrossRef
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research's promotion to internationally competitive journal evidenced by journal metrics
Sun Huh
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research.2017; 6(2): 67. CrossRef
How to successfully list a journal in the Social Science Citation Index or Science Citation Index Expanded
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Medical Education.2017; 29(4): 221. CrossRef
Bibliometric and content analysis of medical articles in the PubMed database published by North Korean authors from 1997 to July 2017
Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
Science Editing.2017; 4(2): 70. CrossRef

Analysis of journal attributes of 403 KoreaScience journals from the viewpoint of author: Sung-Nam Cho, Tae-Sul Seo, Hee-Yoon Choi, Sun-A Park; Sci Ed. 2016;3(1):19-25. Published online February 19, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.58

15,660 View
139 Download
2 Web of Science
3 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Korea is a country in which journal industry is rapidly increasing recently. KoreaScience is a typical Korean scientific and technical journal database that may be used to analyze Korean journals. A set of journal attributes reflecting the requirements in view of submitting authors was derived and some characteristics of KoreaScience journals such as subject distribution, launch year, publication frequency, publication language, and open access were quantitatively analyzed according to the journal attributes. As a result, it was found that Korean journals are published in almost all subject categories except some subject categories under Physics. The number of journal has been increased rapidly during the period between 1980s and 1990s. Journals published quarterly are 45%. Journals published in English are 31%. Open access journals are 26% while 72% free access.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Temporal characteristics of journals indexed in both KCI and Scopus: analyzing journal age, coverage and journal metrics
Eungi Kim, Madhu Atteraya, Shreejana Gnawali
Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Subject area mapping of Indonesian journals from GARUDA (Garba Rujukan Digital) and SINTA (Science Technology Index) databases: a descriptive study
Eko Didik Widianto, Hadiyanto, Teddy Mantoro, Arseto Satriyo Nugroho
Science Editing.2025; 12(2): 175. CrossRef
Study on Development of Journal and Article Visualization Services
Sung-Nam Cho, Tae-Sul Seo
Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science.2016; 50(2): 183. CrossRef

Opinions of Korean science editors on open access policies, editorial difficulties, and government’s support for publishing: Sun Huh, Hye-Min Cho, Hyungsun Kim; Sci Ed. 2015;2(2):55-58. Published online August 14, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.44

19,215 View
123 Download
5 Web of Science
5 Crossref

Abstract PDF

The Korean government has supported scholarly scientific journal publishing since 1971 through the Korean Federation of Science and Technologies (hereafter the Federation). To ensure that this funding is used as efficiently as possible, the views of science editors should be considered. This study measured the opinions of Korean science editors on open access policies, difficulties during editing, and the government’s support for publishing. From November 28 to December 10 of 2013, web survey invitations were emailed to 368 journal editors listed by the Federation. The web survey tool Surveymonkey was used to create a questionnaire that consisted of ten items, including the research category for each journal. Out of the 368 editors, 82 responded to the survey (22.3%). Sixty-nine editors (84.1%) had already accepted the open access or free access policy. Of the 13 editors of journals without open/free access policies, seven hoped to adopt a policy within three years. The most difficult tasks in journal publishing were adding a journal to international databases, operating with an inadequate budget, and recruiting professional manuscript editors. Editors want the Federation to increase budgets to cover full-text extensible markup language production costs, to provide guidelines for adding journals to international databases, and to provide programs for training professional manuscript editors and a plagiarism detection system. Most science editors in Korea have already adopted an open/free access policy. Training professional manuscript editors, using plagiarism detection system, and producing full-text extensible markup language should be considered as important items for journal publishing support from the Federation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Perceived awareness, benefits, and strategies of Pakistani editors regarding open-access journal publishing
Muhammad Zahid Raza, Muhammad Rafiq, Saira Hanif Soroya
Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Exploring state and institutional support for sustainable scholarly journal publishing
Maryna Zhenchenko, Olha Dunaievska
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES.2025; 18(3): 144. CrossRef
Readiness of Pakistani journals for open access publishing
Muhammad Zahid Raza, Muhammad Rafiq, Saira Hanif Soroya
The Electronic Library .2024; 42(5): 795. CrossRef
Development of a diagnostic framework and its application to open access journal publishing in Korea
Nayon Kim, JungWon Yoon, Jae Yun Lee, Kyoung Hee Joung, Hyekyong Hwang, Seo Young Bai, EunKyung Chung
Learned Publishing.2023; 36(3): 379. CrossRef
Equality, equity, and reality of open access on scholarly information
Jeong-Wook Seo, Hosik Chung, Tae-Sul Seo, Youngim Jung, Eun Seong Hwang, Cheol-Heui Yun, Hyungsun Kim
Science Editing.2017; 4(2): 58. CrossRef

Training Material

Journal Article Tag Suite 1.0: National Information Standards Organization standard of journal extensible markup language: Sun Huh; Sci Ed. 2014;1(2):99-104. Published online August 18, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.99

22,893 View
155 Download
23 Web of Science
23 Crossref

Abstract PDF

In the era of information technology, scholarly journals cannot escape the rising tide of technological advancement. To be exposed more easily to readers, the web forms of scholarly journals and articles become more important year after year. Furthermore, there is a trend of print journals closing, and a significant emergence of online journals. Journal Article Tag Suite (JATS) extensible markup language (XML) became an National Information Standards Organization standard language in online journal publishing in 2012. It is an essential format to present readers with a more user-friendly interface. JATS XML was developed by PubMed Central (PMC) XML, which was a deposit form of articles to PMC. Editors and other publishing-related personnel should be able to understand the concept and production process of XML files. When JATS XML is produced, a variety of web presentation views can be generated, such as PubReader and epub 3.0. Further, JATS XML can be easily converted to digital object identifier CrossRef XML, CrossMark XML, and FundRef XML. Small scholarly society journal editors and publishers can promote the visibility of their journals by depositing JATS XML files to PMC or ScienceCentral. Owing to these benefits of JATS XML, publishers and editors should now adopt JATS XML for journal publishing.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Cross-lingual citations in English papers: a large-scale analysis of prevalence, usage, and impact
Tarek Saier, Michael Färber, Tornike Tsereteli
International Journal on Digital Libraries.2022; 23(2): 179. CrossRef
Open-source code to convert Journal Article Tag Suite Extensible Markup Language (JATS XML) to various viewers and other XML types for scholarly journal publishing
Younsang Cho
Science Editing.2022; 9(2): 162. CrossRef
The role of metadata in reproducible computational research
Jeremy Leipzig, Daniel Nüst, Charles Tapley Hoyt, Karthik Ram, Jane Greenberg
Patterns.2021; 2(9): 100322. CrossRef
Semantic Publication of Agricultural Scientific Literature Using Property Graphs
Francisco Abad-Navarro, José Antonio Bernabé-Diaz, Alexander García-Castro, Jesualdo Tomás Fernandez-Breis
Applied Sciences.2020; 10(3): 861. CrossRef
unarXive: a large scholarly data set with publications’ full-text, annotated in-text citations, and links to metadata
Tarek Saier, Michael Färber
Scientometrics.2020; 125(3): 3085. CrossRef
The Thirty-First Year Journey, the Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Hee Jeong Yoo, Min-Hyeon Park, Jae Hyun Yoo, Minha Hong, Geon Ho Bahn
Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.2020; 31(4): 201. CrossRef
Improving Publication Pipeline with Automated Biological Entity Detection and Validation Service
Weijia Xu, Amit Gupta, Pankaj Jaiswal, Crispin Taylor, Patti Lockhart, Jennifer Regala
Data and Information Management.2019; 3(1): 3. CrossRef
How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
Sun Huh
Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95. CrossRef
Finding useful data across multiple biomedical data repositories using DataMed
Lucila Ohno-Machado, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, George Alter, Ian Fore, Jeffrey Grethe, Hua Xu, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Anupama E Gururaj, Elizabeth Bell, Ergin Soysal, Nansu Zong, Hyeon-eui Kim
Nature Genetics.2017; 49(6): 816. CrossRef
Promotion ofNeurointerventionto International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
Sun Huh
Neurointervention.2016; 11(1): 5. CrossRef
Journal of Gastric Cancer's Promotion to International Journal from the Perspective of Biliometric Analysis
Sun Huh
Journal of Gastric Cancer.2016; 16(1): 8. CrossRef
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery's Evolution into an International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
Sun Huh
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2016; 8(2): 127. CrossRef
Natural Language Processing Using Kepler Workflow System: First Steps
Ankit Goyal, Alok Singh, Shitij Bhargava, Daniel Crawl, Ilkay Altintas, Chun-Nan Hsu
Procedia Computer Science.2016; 80: 712. CrossRef
How to Promote the Korean Journal of Child Studies to an International Journal
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Child Studies.2016; 37(1): 7. CrossRef
Analysis of the suitability of the Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies journal evaluation tool
Geum‐Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
Learned Publishing.2016; 29(3): 193. CrossRef
Status of digital standards in Korean medical journals in 2016
Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
Science Editing.2016; 3(2): 100. CrossRef
Text mining resources for the life sciences
Piotr Przybyła, Matthew Shardlow, Sophie Aubin, Robert Bossy, Richard Eckart de Castilho, Stelios Piperidis, John McNaught, Sophia Ananiadou
Database.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
Evidence of the Internationalization ofClinical EndoscopyBased on Journal Metrics
Sun Huh
Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(4): 317. CrossRef
How much progress has been made in journal metrics two years after the citation analysis of theKorean Journal of Urology?
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Urology.2015; 56(4): 276. CrossRef
How much is Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions promoted based on journal metrics?
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2015; 12: 57. CrossRef
The Elevation ofAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicineto the Status of an International Journal After Adopting an English-Only Policy
Sun Huh
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2015; 39(5): 661. CrossRef
How Journal Metrics Illustrate the Transformation of Archives of Plastic Surgery into an International Journal
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2014; 41(06): 617. CrossRef
What is the position ofClinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicinein its scholarly journal network based on journal metrics?
Sun Huh
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine.2014; 41(4): 147. CrossRef

Original Articles

The current status of science journals in Indonesia: Komang G. Wiryawan; Sci Ed. 2014;1(2):71-75. Published online August 18, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.71

65,535 View
330 Download
17 Web of Science
16 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Indonesia is the fourth most highly populated country in the world. Every year, there are more than 1.5-million students enrolled into universities across Indonesia. This large number of students is a potential source of scientific publication, as all students are required to publish a paper before they take their final examination. To accommodate this publication demand, good-quality journals need to be established in Indonesia. Therefore, this paper will describe the current status of scientific journals in Indonesia and some other information related to Indonesian scientific journals. The data presented in this article were obtained from the websites of government institutions such as Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Ministry of Education and Culture, and Indonesian Scientific Journal Database. Currently, there are 5,900 scientific journals in Indonesia that are grouped into three classes, namely non-accredited journals (5,579 titles), accredited journals (342 titles), and international journals (16 titles). Most journals are published by universities, faculties, or departments. Other journals are published by research centers and scientific associations. In recent years, the number of journals indexed in Scopus has increased substantially, from only 2 journals before the year 2000 to 16 journals in 2013. In addition, the number of journals registered in the DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) increased sharply from 3 titles in 2009 to 109 titles at the end of 2013. In the year 2012, the number of papers published in the abovementioned journals was 145,000, but only 1,314 papers were published internationally. This number is still very low, even when compared to some Southeast Asian countries. To improve the quality of journals and to increase the number of papers published, a high commitment from the government is required, particularly in terms of regulation formulation and funding provision.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The promotion of university journals published by Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia, from 2018 to 2024: a descriptive study
Eko Didik Widianto, Hadiyanto, Teddy Mantoro, Raka Sindu Wardoyo
Science Editing.2025; 12(1): 43. CrossRef
Subject area mapping of Indonesian journals from GARUDA (Garba Rujukan Digital) and SINTA (Science Technology Index) databases: a descriptive study
Eko Didik Widianto, Hadiyanto, Teddy Mantoro, Arseto Satriyo Nugroho
Science Editing.2025; 12(2): 175. CrossRef
Charting the Future of Oral Health: A Bibliometric Exploration of Quality-of-Life Research in Dentistry
Agatha Ravi Vidiasratri, Lisdrianto Hanindriyo, Caroline Manuela Hartanto
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2024; 21(3): 249. CrossRef
Improving manuscript quality in Asian science journals to take a leap forward in the next 5 years
Khoerul Umam, Komang G. Wiryawan, Supandi Supandi, Tae-Sul Seo, Eka Nana Susanti, Tirta Anhari
Science Editing.2024; 12(1): 61. CrossRef
Who are the 100 largest scientific publishers by journal count? A webscraping approach
Andreas Nishikawa-Pacher
Journal of Documentation.2022; 78(7): 450. CrossRef
Quality of psychiatry journals published from India: Insights for readers, researchers, and publishers
Samir K. Praharaj, Shahul Ameen, Vikas Menon
Indian Journal of Psychiatry.2022; 64(6): 606. CrossRef
Reproducing Academic Insularity in a Time of Neo-liberal Markets: The Case of Social Science Research in Indonesian State Universities
Inaya Rakhmani
Journal of Contemporary Asia.2021; 51(1): 64. CrossRef
Higher Education with the Most Publication in Focus Area of Basic Science using Frequency Distribution
A Fauzy, L Chabib, Kasam, Mustangimah, F Nurlette
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.2020; 448(1): 012076. CrossRef
A bibliometric analysis of articles on innovation systems in Scopus journals written by authors from Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia
Prakoso Bhairawa Putera, Suryanto Suryanto, Sinta Ningrum, Ida Widianingsih
Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 177. CrossRef
Economic Modelling of Predatory Journal Publishing
Jingfeng Xia
Publishing Research Quarterly.2019; 35(3): 377. CrossRef
Establishment of the Indonesian Association of Scientific Journal Editors
Komang G. Wiryawan
Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 148. CrossRef
Open access full-text databases in Asian countries
Tae-Sul Seo
Science Editing.2018; 5(1): 26. CrossRef
Why and how do we keep editing local medical journals in an era of information overload?
Viera Wardhani, Sam Mathew, Jeong-Wook Seo, Komang G. Wiryawan, Vivi Setiawaty, Burmaajav Badrakh
Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 150. CrossRef
Equality, equity, and reality of open access on scholarly information
Jeong-Wook Seo, Hosik Chung, Tae-Sul Seo, Youngim Jung, Eun Seong Hwang, Cheol-Heui Yun, Hyungsun Kim
Science Editing.2017; 4(2): 58. CrossRef
A Comparison Between Malay and English Research Article Discussions
Chek Kim Loi, Moyra Sweetnam Evans, Jason Miin-Hwa Lim, Songyut Akkakoson
Sage Open.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
Academic journals and cultural diversity
Kihong Kim
Science Editing.2015; 2(1): 1. CrossRef

Increase in frequency of citation by SCIE journals of non-Medline journals after listing in an open access full-text database: Geum-Hee Jeong, Sun Huh; Sci Ed. 2014;1(1):24-26. Published online February 13, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.24

23,490 View
206 Download
31 Web of Science
36 Crossref

Abstract PDF

We hypothesized that it is not open access status but rather exposure in the PubMed platform that affects citation frequency in medical journals. In November 2008, medical journals from Korea began to be added to PubMed Central (PMC). Therefore, it would be interesting to know whether or not their impact factor based on Web of Science has increased since the journals were listed in PMC/PubMed. To answer this question, a citation analysis of seven journals that have been indexed in PMC since 2008 or 2009 was done. Only non-Medline journals were selected and the impact factors of five Medline journals were compared. The impact factor was calculated via Web of Science. Journal Citation Reports (JCR) data were used if the data of the target journals were provided in JCR. Trends for the impact factors of different years were analyzed using dBSTAT ver. 5.0. There has been an increasing rates of the impact factor for the seven non-Medline journals, 1.92 in 2011 over 2010; 3.27 in 2010 over 2009; 1.12 in 2012 over 2011. As for the five Medline journals, the increasing rate in 2010 over 2009 was 1.18; however, those of 2011 over 2010 and 2012 over 2011 were 1.01 and 1.04 respectively. The Science Citation Index Expanded impact factor of medical journals published in Korea can be increased if those journals are published in English and listed in PMC. This is an effect of the platform in which the journals are listed and not just an effect of free access.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Leaving behind fond memories, I am stepping away from my role as editor of the Ewha Medical Journal after finalizing this issue's theme
Sun Huh
Ewha Medical Journal.2025; 48(4): e51. CrossRef
Congratulations on Child Health Nursing Research becoming a PubMed Central journal and reflections on its significance
Sun Huh
Child Health Nursing Research.2022; 28(1): 1. CrossRef
Evidence-based recommendations for increasing the citation frequency of original articles
Nicole Heßler, Andreas Ziegler
Scientometrics.2022; 127(6): 3367. CrossRef
Suggestions for Exercise Science’s Promotion to a Top-Tier Journal in the Category of Sports Science
Sun Huh
Exercise Science.2022; 31(3): 279. CrossRef
Marking the inclusion of the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing in PubMed Central and strategies to be promoted to a top-tier journal in the nursing category
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing.2022; 28(3): 165. CrossRef
PubMed Central as a platform for the survival of open-access biomedical society journals published in Korea
Sun Huh
Science Editing.2021; 8(2): 153. CrossRef
Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef
Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
Sun Huh
Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238. CrossRef
How Annals of Dermatology Has Improved the Scientific Quality and Ethical Standards of its Articles in the Two-Year Period since October 2018
Sun Huh
Annals of Dermatology.2020; 32(5): 353. CrossRef
Development Status of the Korean Journal of Child Studies 4 Years After the Suggestions made in 2016
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Child Studies.2020; 41(6): 1. CrossRef
Status of digital standards, licensing types, and archiving policies in Asian open access journals registered in Directory of Open Access Journals
Soon Kim, Hyungwook Choi
Science Editing.2019; 6(1): 41. CrossRef
How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
Sun Huh
Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95. CrossRef
The great rise ofIntestinal Researchas an international journal 3 years after its language change to English as evidenced by journal metrics
Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
Intestinal Research.2017; 15(1): 1. CrossRef
The rapid internationalization of Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism as evidenced by journal metrics
Sun Huh
Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism.2017; 22(2): 77. CrossRef
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research's promotion to internationally competitive journal evidenced by journal metrics
Sun Huh
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research.2017; 6(2): 67. CrossRef
Promotion ofNeurointerventionto International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
Sun Huh
Neurointervention.2016; 11(1): 5. CrossRef
Promotion to MEDLINE, indexing with Medical Subject Headings, and open data policy for the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2016; 13: 14. CrossRef
Journal of Gastric Cancer's Promotion to International Journal from the Perspective of Biliometric Analysis
Sun Huh
Journal of Gastric Cancer.2016; 16(1): 8. CrossRef
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery's Evolution into an International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
Sun Huh
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2016; 8(2): 127. CrossRef
How to Promote the Korean Journal of Child Studies to an International Journal
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Child Studies.2016; 37(1): 7. CrossRef
Analysis of the suitability of the Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies journal evaluation tool
Geum‐Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
Learned Publishing.2016; 29(3): 193. CrossRef
Current status of Science Citation Index Expanded listing of Korean medical journals and effect of PubMed electronic publication ahead of print to their impact factors
Jae Jun Shim, Byung-Ho Kim
Science Editing.2016; 3(2): 94. CrossRef
Status of digital standards in Korean medical journals in 2016
Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
Science Editing.2016; 3(2): 100. CrossRef
How much progress has been made in journal metrics two years after the citation analysis of theKorean Journal of Urology?
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Urology.2015; 56(4): 276. CrossRef
Evidence of the Internationalization ofClinical EndoscopyBased on Journal Metrics
Sun Huh
Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(4): 317. CrossRef
Scientific and academic journals in the Philippines: status and challenges
Evelyn Mae Tecson-Mendoza
Science Editing.2015; 2(2): 73. CrossRef
The Elevation ofAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicineto the Status of an International Journal After Adopting an English-Only Policy
Sun Huh
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2015; 39(5): 661. CrossRef
How much is Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions promoted based on journal metrics?
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2015; 12: 57. CrossRef
Journal Metrics-Based Position ofDiabetes & Metabolism Journalafter the Change of Its Text Language to English
Sun Huh
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal.2014; 38(3): 187. CrossRef
Editing and publishing scholarly journals in the internet age
Kihong Kim
Science Editing.2014; 1(1): 2. CrossRef
Application of new information technologies to scholarly journals: ORCID, CrossMark, and FundRef
Sun Huh
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2014; 57(5): 455. CrossRef
How Far Has theInternational Neurourology JournalProgressed Since Its Transformation Into an English Language Journal?
Sun Huh
International Neurourology Journal.2014; 18(1): 3. CrossRef
The basics of CrossRef extensible markup language
Rachael Lammey
Science Editing.2014; 1(2): 76. CrossRef
Journal Article Tag Suite 1.0: National Information Standards Organization standard of journal extensible markup language
Sun Huh
Science Editing.2014; 1(2): 99. CrossRef
How Journal Metrics Illustrate the Transformation of Archives of Plastic Surgery into an International Journal
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2014; 41(06): 617. CrossRef
What is the position ofClinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicinein its scholarly journal network based on journal metrics?
Sun Huh
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine.2014; 41(4): 147. CrossRef

Review

Using Journal Article Tag Suite extensible markup language for scholarly journal articles written in Korean: Sun Huh, Tae Jin Choi, So-Hyeong Kim; Sci Ed. 2014;1(1):19-23. Published online February 13, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.19

20,744 View
115 Download
16 Web of Science
10 Crossref

Abstract PDF

The Republic of Korea is the fourth ranking country for the number of PubMed Central (PMC) journals. As of September 2013, 75 journals from Korea are included in PMC. Starting in 2013, several research funding agencies for scholarly journal publications in Korea began to establish open access, full-text databases in the fields of medicine, science, and social sciences and humanities. In those databases, Journal Article Tag Suite (JATS) 1.0 is used so that articles written in the Korean language can be easily manipulated as full-text extensible markup language (XML). Editors or publishers must produce full-text XML files based on JATS 1.0. Thus this paper surveys the current state of the application of JATS 1.0 to Korean scholarly journals, including both those in English and those in Korean, focusing on the current technology, training programs, and the policy of the Korean government on open access, full-text XML. This experience in Korea can be a model for constructing mother-tongue, open access, full-text journal databases based on JATS 1.0 in other countries. The usefulness of JATS in scholarly journal publications not only of all fields, but also in all languages, is stressed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Improving Publication Pipeline with Automated Biological Entity Detection and Validation Service
Weijia Xu, Amit Gupta, Pankaj Jaiswal, Crispin Taylor, Patti Lockhart, Jennifer Regala
Data and Information Management.2019; 3(1): 3. CrossRef
Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
Sun Huh
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524. CrossRef
Opinions of Korean science editors on open access policies, editorial difficulties, and government’s support for publishing
Sun Huh, Hye-Min Cho, Hyungsun Kim
Science Editing.2015; 2(2): 55. CrossRef
Journal Metrics-Based Position ofDiabetes & Metabolism Journalafter the Change of Its Text Language to English
Sun Huh
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal.2014; 38(3): 187. CrossRef
How Far Has theInternational Neurourology JournalProgressed Since Its Transformation Into an English Language Journal?
Sun Huh
International Neurourology Journal.2014; 18(1): 3. CrossRef
Editing and publishing scholarly journals in the internet age
Kihong Kim
Science Editing.2014; 1(1): 2. CrossRef
Application of new information technologies to scholarly journals: ORCID, CrossMark, and FundRef
Sun Huh
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2014; 57(5): 455. CrossRef
Coding practice of the Journal Article Tag Suite extensible markup language
Sun Huh
Science Editing.2014; 1(2): 105. CrossRef
Journal Article Tag Suite 1.0: National Information Standards Organization standard of journal extensible markup language
Sun Huh
Science Editing.2014; 1(2): 99. CrossRef
How Journal Metrics Illustrate the Transformation of Archives of Plastic Surgery into an International Journal
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2014; 41(06): 617. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search