Purpose This study investigates shifts in scientific research focus, particularly the decline in COVID-19-related research and the rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) publications.
Methods We analyzed publication data from the Web of Science, comparing yearly publication counts for COVID-19 and AI research. The study also tracked changes in the impact factors of leading journals like Science and Nature, alongside those of top AI journals over the past decade. Additionally, we reviewed the top 10 most cited articles in 2021 from Science and Nature and the most influential AI publications from the past five years according to Google Scholar. The impact trends of the top 100 AI journals in computer science were also explored.
Results The analysis reveals a noticeable decline in COVID-19 related publications as the pandemic urgency diminishes, contrasted with the continued rapid growth of AI research. Impact factors for prestigious journals have shifted, with AI journals increasingly dominating the academic landscape. The review of top-cited articles further emphasizes these trends.
Conclusion Our findings indicate a significant shift in research priorities, with AI emerging as a dominant field poised to address future challenges, reflecting the evolving focus of the scientific community.
Purpose This study investigated how Journal Citation Reports (JCR) metrics changed during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2022), with the aim of sharing this information with stakeholders in the publishing community.
Methods In total, 7,689 journals listed in the JCR-Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) from 2016 to 2022 were selected. Data were analyzed using pivot tables in Microsoft Excel. We calculated the compound annual growth rate to investigate changes in JCR-SCIE articles, citations, the journal impact factor, and the immediacy index during the COVID-19 period.
Results A marked increase was noted in the number of articles and citations during the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 to 2022. This surge was primarily driven by a significant rise in COVID-19–related articles. Consequently, four JCR metrics exhibited a sharp increase in 2020, followed by an unusually steep decline in 2022. Articles, citations, and the journal impact factor reached their highest recorded levels in 2021, while the immediacy index saw its most significant growth and intense citation activity in 2020 before experiencing notable decreases in 2021 and 2022. Our findings indicate that there was an unprecedented and dramatic shift in these four JCR metrics during the COVID-19 period, with current trends suggesting a reversion to historical compound annual growth rate levels.
Conclusion The journal publishing and scientific communities should consider these explosive changes when applying JCR metrics to evaluate articles and endeavor to mitigate the adverse effects of the unusual concentration of articles and citations during the COVID-19 period. These results constitute valuable information to be shared among researchers and stakeholders within the journal publishing community.
Purpose The multiyear COVID-19 pandemic has affected the volume and speed of publications in scientific journals. This study evaluated trends in the impact measures of international medical journals published in Korea, including the journal impact factor (JIF).
Methods We selected Science Citation Index Expanded journals with the country/region set to Korea and the academic category classified as “clinical medicine” in Journal Citation Reports. Trends in indicators such as the JIF and Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) were assessed for journals with JIF information from 2018 to 2022. Ratios and differences between the measures were calculated to determine the extent of the change.
Results We identified 43 journals, and the average JIF of those journals increased from 2.33 in 2018 and 2.50 in 2019 to 3.45 in 2020 and 3.86 in 2021. Other measures, such as the 5-year JIF and JCI, steadily increased, and the proportion of gold open access journals also increased significantly. However, the JCI and Eigenfactor scores remained steady or showed relatively small increases. Furthermore, impact measures declined in 2022, including a JIF decrease to 3.55.
Conclusion We presented trends in quantitative measurements for international medical journals in Korea, and found an overall increase. Journals need to maintain a rigorous publication process to improve the quality of their research and the research community needs to exercise caution when using quantitative measures to evaluate journals. Further research is required to examine the quantitative indicators of journals, including their publication policies, research topics, and long-term trends.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Scientific Publication Speed of Korean Medical Journals during the COVID-19 Era Hyeonseok Seo, Yaechan Kim, Dongryeong Kim, Hanul Kang, Chansu Park, Sejin Park, Junha Kang, Janghyeog Oh, Hyunsung Kang, Mi Ah Han Healthcare Informatics Research.2024; 30(3): 277. CrossRef
Purpose This study aimed to investigate the changes that occurred in journal and article publishing during the noncontact period that started in 2020 due to COVID-19.
Methods The integrated journal list in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2017–2021 and the search results of Web of Science were analyzed using pivot tables in Microsoft Excel. The articles, citations, impact factor (IF), publishers, open access (OA) status, and compound annual growth rate (CAGR) were investigated using the data.
Results The CAGRs of articles, citations, and IFs in JCR journals increased throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, the increase in OA articles was accompanied by a decreasing share of subscription articles. The top 20 journals in JCR-SCIE (Science Citation Index Expanded), based on the number of articles, accepted OA policies and showed a strong influence, accounting for 7% to 9% of all articles. MDPI and Frontiers were OA publishers included among the top 10 publishers. Large publishers maintained their competitiveness through mergers and acquisitions with OA publishers. Due to the rapid distribution of OA and early access articles as part of the international response to overcome COVID-19, the CAGRs of citations and IFs increased more than that of articles, and the publication and use of journal articles have become more active.
Conclusion The publication and use trends in JCR journals analyzed herein will provide useful information for researchers’ selection of journals for article submission, analyses of research performance, and libraries’ journal subscription contracts.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review Sang-Jun Kim Science Editing.2024; 11(2): 96. CrossRef
Explosive increase and decrease in articles, citations, impact factor, and immediacy index during the COVID-19 pandemic: a bibliometric study Sang-Jun Kim Science Editing.2024; 11(2): 107. CrossRef
Trends in research on ChatGPT and adoption-related issues discussed in articles: a narrative review Sang-Jun Kim Science Editing.2023; 11(1): 3. CrossRef
This study investigated whether there was an increase in submissions to scholarly journals in Korea according to journals’ field and indexation status in Scopus or Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) in 2020, the year when the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic first spread throughout the world. The analysis included 60 journals with esubmission systems operated by M2PI. Yearly and monthly submissions were counted from 2016 to 2020. The yearly proportional change was also calculated. In 2020, submissions soared for medical journals indexed in Scopus/SCIE (49.5%), corresponding to an increase of 36.9% relative to the expected number of submissions. There was also a surge of submissions to these journals from March to July 2020. However, non-medical journals and medical journals not indexed in Scopus/SCIE did not show an increase in submissions. The number of submissions to scholarly journals in Korea was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in a specific subset of journals. The background of the spike in submissions is required to be re-investigated. Editors’ burden also should be mitigated through editorial board members’ help and publishers’ support.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Emergence of the metaverse and ChatGPT in journal publishing after the COVID-19 pandemic Sun Huh Science Editing.2023; 10(1): 1. CrossRef
Application of computer-based testing in the Korean Medical Licensing Examination, the emergence of the metaverse in medical education, journal metrics and statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers Sun Huh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2022; 19: 2. CrossRef
Review of studies about bat-fly interactions inside roosts, with observations on partnership patterns for publications Gustavo Lima Urbieta, Gustavo Graciolli, Valéria da Cunha Tavares Parasitology Research.2022; 121(11): 3051. CrossRef
Purpose This bibliometric study investigated the current state of documents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Islamic finance published by digital object identifierequipped journals listed in the Dimensions database. The analysis focused on describing the characterictics and trends of the keywords, authors, and journals.
Methods The data analyzed were from 149 research publications in Dimensions. The search tems were “COVID” and “Islamic finance.” The searches used to establish the study dataset were last updated on August 27, 2020. Descriptive statistical methods were used, and a bibliometric analysis was conducted using Biblioshiny, an R-based app, to generate a bibliometric map.
Results The number of articles discussing the theme of COVID-19 and Islamic finance was quite large in recent months, with more than 100 articles published. The most popular keywords used were “COVID,” “food,” and “pandemic,” although there were also many keywords that related more specifically to the field of Islamic finance, namely “banks,” “markets,” “health,” “debt,” “equity,” “management,” and “stock.”
Conclusion This study provides an overview of trends in the most popular keywords, journals, and authors of articles on the topic of COVID-19 and Islamic finance, which has been quite a popular theme in recent months, thereby providing information for researchers specializing in the field of Islamic finance. This theme has the potential to continue to be developed.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The impact of COVID-19 on the global forestry sector – A bibliometric analysis-based literature review Manuja Jayasundara, Parag Kadam, Puneet Dwivedi Forest Policy and Economics.2024; 158: 103103. CrossRef
A bibliometric review of Islamic economics and finance bibliometric papers: an overview of the future of Islamic economics and finance Denizar Abdurrahman Mi'raj, Salih Ulev Qualitative Research in Financial Markets.2024; 16(5): 993. CrossRef
Impact of digital advancements on accounting, auditing and reporting literature: insights, practice implications and future research directions Mustafa Raza Rabbani Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Exposition of techno-functional components of intelligent food supply chain: a review and future research agenda Anil Kumar Sharma, Manoj Kumar Srivastava, Ritu Sharma Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.2024; 39(9): 1928. CrossRef
Bibliometric Analysis of Articles on COVID-19 in the Transportation Industry: An Early Study Harun Karakavuz, Nilüfer Canöz, Ahmet Ertek Trafik ve Ulaşım Araştırmaları Dergisi.2024; 7(2): 102. CrossRef
Network and cybersecurity applications of defense in adversarial attacks: A state-of-the-art using machine learning and deep learning methods Yahya Layth Khaleel, Mustafa Abdulfattah Habeeb, A. S. Albahri, Tahsien Al-Quraishi, O. S. Albahri, A. H. Alamoodi Journal of Intelligent Systems.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Navigating through pandemics: a bibliometric analysis of research trends in Islamic finance and Islamic banking Azhar Mohamad Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Health Advocacy Trends and Unexplored Facets—A Bibliometric Analysis Based on SCOPUS Database Ankit Singh, Neha Ahire Hospital Topics.2024; : 1. CrossRef
A bibliometric analysis of halal product literature: Research stream and future direction Muhamad Subhi Apriantoro, Salsabilla Ines Sekartaji, Ahmad Nurrohim, Esty Setyo Utaminingsih International Journal of ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES.2024; 11(9): 227. CrossRef
Global Health Diplomacy and Governance: Mapping and Future Trends Ankit Singh, Priya Ravi Hospital Topics.2023; 101(3): 245. CrossRef
Sustainable strategic management: A bibliometric analysis P. Kritee Rao, Akanksha Shukla Business Strategy and the Environment.2023; 32(6): 3902. CrossRef
Unravelling the techno-functional building blocks of metaverse ecosystems – A review and research agenda Arpan Kumar Kar, P.S. Varsha International Journal of Information Management Data Insights.2023; 3(2): 100176. CrossRef
Islamic banking spin-offs decision: A bibliometric review Zulfikar Bagus Pambuko, Jaka Sriyana Cogent Business & Management.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Internet of Things in Digital Health Care Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Recent Literature Mohammad Amees Journal of Hospital Librarianship.2023; 23(3): 164. CrossRef
Uncovering Trends and Research Gaps in Corporate Governance and Islamic Finance Daing Maruak Sadek, Suhaida Abu Bakar, Muhammad Saiful Islami Mohd Taher, Mohd Badrul Hakimi Daud Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal.2023; 8(SI14): 149. CrossRef
Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study Sun Huh Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321. CrossRef
Research trends and hotspots of breast cancer management during the COVID-19 pandemic: A bibliometric analysis Peng-fei Lyu, Jing-tai Li, Tang Deng, Guang-Xun Lin, Ping-ming Fan, Xu-Chen Cao Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Mapping intellectual structures and research hotspots in the application of artificial intelligence in cancer: A bibliometric analysis Peng-fei Lyu, Yu Wang, Qing-Xiang Meng, Ping-ming Fan, Ke Ma, Sha Xiao, Xun-chen Cao, Guang-Xun Lin, Si-yuan Dong Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Data-Driven Approach to Assess Street Safety: Large-Scale Analysis of the Microscopic Design Wanshu Wu, Jinhan Guo, Ziying Ma, Kai Zhao ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information.2022; 11(11): 537. CrossRef
Conceptual Structure and Current Trends in Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Research in Sports: A Bibliometric Review Carlo Dindorf, Eva Bartaguiz, Freya Gassmann, Michael Fröhlich International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 20(1): 173. CrossRef
Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study Sun Huh Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef
Purpose This study explored the state of the literature on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in two subject areas: (1) economics, econometrics, and finance, and (2) business, management, and accounting. The study focused on the most productive and influential journals, countries, institutions, documents, and clusters of keywords.
Methods Data were retrieved from Scopus on November 21, 2020. The search term was the keyword “COVID-19” in the title, abstract, and author’s keywords, and the articles were limited to two subject areas. The data were analyzed using VOSviewer and Excel.
Results In the analysis of 1,719 articles on COVID-19, the most productive journal that published these articles was Gender, Work, and Organization (n=49). The most productive country and institutions were the United States (n=526) and Universiteit van Pretoria (n=16) and the University of Oxford (n=16), respectively. Based on citations, the most influential authors, countries, and journals were Dmitry Ivanov (n=233), the United States (n=1,027), and Finance Research Letters (n=326), respectively. The most cited article was authored by Stefan Gossling (n=157) on the impact of COVID-19 on society, the economy, and tourism. The articles were from 111 countries, of which 85.6% had collaborations. The keywords of research on COVID-19 formed 14 clusters (e.g., small and medium enterprises, aviation, tourism, banking and finance, supply chain, economic growth, and the digital economy).
Conclusion The number of COVID-19 articles related to economics and business is fairly large and is continuing to grow significantly. The keyword analysis showed that COVID-19 has had a tremendous impact on all economic sectors.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A Bibliometric and Co-Occurrence Analysis of Work-Life Balance Soumi Majumder, Debasish Biswas International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management.2023; 16(1): 1. CrossRef
Challenges to Responsible Value Creation During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Multiple Case Study on SMEs’ Transformative Responses Hudson Pacifico Silva, Pascale Lehoux, Renata Pozelli Sabio Journal of the Knowledge Economy.2023; 15(3): 14012. CrossRef
What Do We Know and What Do We Need to Know about COVID-19’s Implications on Business Economics? From Bibliometric Analysis to a Conceptual Framework Zhuoyue Zhu, Hongming Xie Sustainability.2022; 14(11): 6396. CrossRef
Eye-Related COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Production Indexed in Scopus Verónica García-Pascual, Elvira García-Beltrán, Begoña Domenech-Amigot International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(16): 9927. CrossRef
Purpose The main purposes of this study were to analyze the document types and languages of published papers on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), along with the top authors, publications, countries, institutions, and disciplines, and to analyze the co-occurrence of keywords and bibliographic coupling of countries and sources of the most-cited COVID-19 literature.
Methods This study analyzed 16,384 COVID-19 studies published between December 2019 and June 2020. The data were extracted from the Web of Science database using four keywords: “COVID-19,” “coronavirus,” “2019-nCoV,” and “SARS-CoV-2.” The top 500 mostcited documents were analyzed for bibliographic and citation network visualization.
Results The studies were published in 19 different languages, and English (95.313%) was the most common. Of 157 research-producing countries, the United States (25.433%) was in the leading position. Wang Y (n=94) was the top author, and the BMJ (n=488) was the top source. The University of London (n=488) was the leading organization, and medicine-related papers (n=2,259) accounted for the highest proportion. The co-occurrence of keywords analysis identified “coronavirus,” “COVID-19,” “SARS-CoV-2,” “2019-nCoV,” and “pneumonia” as the most frequent words. The bibliographic coupling analysis of countries and sources showed the strongest collaborative links between China and the United States and between the New England Journal of Medicine and the JAMA.
Conclusion Collaboration between the United States and China was key in COVID-19 research during this period. Although BMJ was the leading title for COVID-19 articles, the co-author link between New England Journal of Medicine and JAMA was the strongest.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Bibliometric and Subject Analysis of 100 Most-Cited Articles in the Field of Art Therapy Hoda Homavandi, Masoud Motalebi Kashani, Zahra Batooli Journal of Creativity in Mental Health.2024; 19(3): 406. CrossRef
Sustainable business model innovation literature: a bibliometrics analysis Ling Pan, Zeshui Xu, Marinko Skare Review of Managerial Science.2023; 17(3): 757. CrossRef
A Bibliometric and Co-Occurrence Analysis of Work-Life Balance Soumi Majumder, Debasish Biswas International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management.2023; 16(1): 1. CrossRef
A koronavírus-járvány a közgazdasági szakirodalomban. Egy új határterület tudománymetriai elemzése Ádám Török, Andrea Magda Nagy, Boglárka Konka Közgazdasági Szemle.2023; 70(3): 284. CrossRef
Fault diagnosis of photovoltaic systems using artificial intelligence: A bibliometric approach Edgar Hernando Sepúlveda-Oviedo, Louise Travé-Massuyès, Audine Subias, Marko Pavlov, Corinne Alonso Heliyon.2023; 9(11): e21491. CrossRef
Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis Hellen Ogutu, Youssef El Archi, Lóránt Dénes Dávid Oeconomia Copernicana.2023; 14(1): 11. CrossRef
Gamification in education: A scientometric, content and co-occurrence analysis of systematic review and meta-analysis articles Somayyeh Nadi-Ravandi, Zahra Batooli Education and Information Technologies.2022; 27(7): 10207. CrossRef
Between panic and motivation: did the first wave of COVID-19 affect scientific publishing in Mediterranean countries? Mona Farouk Ali Scientometrics.2022; 127(6): 3083. CrossRef
Eye-Related COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Production Indexed in Scopus Verónica García-Pascual, Elvira García-Beltrán, Begoña Domenech-Amigot International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(16): 9927. CrossRef
Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Research on Sustainability in the Impact of Social Media on Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic Saddam Hossain, M. Sadik Batcha, Ibrahim Atoum, Naved Ahmad, Afnan Al-Shehri Sustainability.2022; 14(24): 16388. CrossRef
Modeling the Epidemic Growth of Preprints on COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 Giovani L. Vasconcelos, Luan P. Cordeiro, Gerson C. Duarte-Filho, Arthur A. Brum Frontiers in Physics.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose The aim of this study was to characterize the network of institutions, journals, and topics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) literature by Korean authors in the Web of Science Core Collection. The specific goals were to identify the collaborative relationships between Korean authors and international authors and to explore clusters of institutions, journals, and topics.
Methods Literature was searched in the Web of Science Core Collection on January 30, 2021. The search terms were “SARS-CoV-2” or “COVID” or “novel coronavirus” in the subject field. The search results were limited again to “South Korea” as the country and the publication type of “article.” The measurement tool was Biblioshiny, an app version tool for Bibliometrix.
Results Korean authors published 3.2 times more COVID-19–related articles in journals outside of Korea than in Korean journals. The journals showed three clusters by bibliographic coupling. In contrast, the co-citation network showed four clusters. Only a few journals were included in the clusters in both analyses. The conceptual structure of Keywords Plus by factorial analysis showed two clusters: “pathology and clinical treatment” and “knowledge and attitudes.” Institutions’ collaborative network consisted of four clusters. Korean researchers actively collaborated with international researchers, especially those in the United States.
Conclusion Because only a few Korean journals were included in the journal clusters by both coupling and co-citation network, more active citation of Korean journals is recommended. The identification of human behavior as a distinct theme in COVID-19 research suggests a different focus in this area besides clinical studies.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A scientometric analysis of the effect of COVID-19 on the spread of research outputs Gianpaolo Zammarchi, Andrea Carta, Silvia Columbu, Luca Frigau, Monica Musio Quality & Quantity.2024; 58(3): 2265. CrossRef
Journal metrics, document network, and conceptual and social structures of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology from 2017 to July 2022: a bibliometric study Sun Huh Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2023; 76(1): 3. CrossRef
Distance is no longer a barrier to healthcare services: current state and future trends of telehealth research Saumyaranjan Sahoo, Junali Sahoo, Satish Kumar, Weng Marc Lim, Nisreen Ameen Internet Research.2023; 33(3): 890. CrossRef
Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study Sun Huh Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321. CrossRef
Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study Sun Huh Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef
Better, Faster, Stronger: The Evolution of Co-authorship in International Management Research Between 1990 and 2016 Oliver Wieczorek, Markus Eckl, Madeleine Bausch, Erik Radisch, Christoph Barmeyer, Malte Rehbein Sage Open.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose This bibliometric study investigated the current state of documents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) published in nursing journals. The analysis focused on the description of most productive journals, institutions, and countries, as well as the characteristics of the documents.
Methods The publications analyzed in this study were retrieved from the Web of Science database with search keywords. The searches used to establish the study dataset were last updated on July 10, 2020. The inclusion criteria were relevant English-language publications in journals published in the Science Citation Index Expanded or Social Science Citation Index. Content analysis of original articles and reviews was done.
Results An analysis of 125 publications on COVID-19 from 48 journals showed that the most productive journal and country were the Journal of Clinical Nursing (n = 18) and the USA (n = 53), respectively. Original articles (n = 27, 21.6%) and review papers (n = 4, 3.2%) accounted for 24.8% of the articles, and the highest number of papers were found in early access (published ahead of print) (n = 51, 40.8%) and Q1 journals (n = 73, 58.4%). The content analysis found 10 data-based original articles or reviews, which dealt with the topics of nurse training (n = 2), nurses’ psychosocial status (n = 2), nursing research methodology (n = 1), nursing guidelines (n = 4), and protection for nurses (n = 1).
Conclusion This study presents the current situation of nursing research on COVID-19 based on an analysis of publications in nursing journals and provides meaningful information to nursing researchers and editorial board members. The number of data-based original articles on nursing related to COVID-19 remains low.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Description and Analysis of Research on Death and Dying during the COVID-19 Pandemic, Published in Nursing Journals Indexed in SCOPUS Leticia Cuellar-Pompa, José Ángel Rodríguez-Gómez, María Mercedes Novo-Muñoz, Natalia Rodríguez-Novo, Yurena M. Rodríguez-Novo, Carlos-Enrique Martínez-Alberto Nursing Reports.2024; 14(2): 655. CrossRef
Characteristics and quality of reporting qualitative nursing research related to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic search and critical review Ian-In Vong, Monique Rothan-Tondeur, Rita Georges Nohra BMC Nursing.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Bibliometric Analysis of Articles on COVID-19 in the Transportation Industry: An Early Study Harun Karakavuz, Nilüfer Canöz, Ahmet Ertek Trafik ve Ulaşım Araştırmaları Dergisi.2024; 7(2): 102. CrossRef
An investigation of emerging COVID-19 research trends and future implications for LIS field: A bibliometric mapping and visualization Arslan Sheikh, Nadeem Siddique, Saima Qutab, Muhammad Ajmal Khan, Khalid Mahmood Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.2023; 55(1): 3. CrossRef
Community-based tourism in East Asia: A bibliometric research note Aaron Tham, Shirley Wei Lee Chin Tourism and Hospitality Research.2023; 23(3): 459. CrossRef
Factors associated with preventive behaviors for COVID-19 among adolescents in South Korea Sunhee Park, Sumi Oh Journal of Pediatric Nursing.2022; 62: e69. CrossRef
Synergistic networks of COVID-19’s top papers Nosrat Riahinia, Farshid Danesh, Somayeh GhaviDel Library Hi Tech.2022; 40(2): 454. CrossRef
Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study Sun Huh Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321. CrossRef
A Bibliometric Analysis on Global Psychological and Behavioral Research Landscape on COVID-19 Pandemic Xilu Dong, Xuqiu Wei, Fei Shu, Qiang Su, Juntao Wang, Ning Liu, Junping Qiu International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(2): 879. CrossRef
A bibliometric analysis of COVID‐19 publications in nursing by visual mapping method Ayşe Çiçek Korkmaz, Serap Altuntaş Journal of Nursing Management.2022; 30(6): 1892. CrossRef
Between panic and motivation: did the first wave of COVID-19 affect scientific publishing in Mediterranean countries? Mona Farouk Ali Scientometrics.2022; 127(6): 3083. CrossRef
Eye-Related COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Production Indexed in Scopus Verónica García-Pascual, Elvira García-Beltrán, Begoña Domenech-Amigot International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(16): 9927. CrossRef
Coronavirus disease-19 in environmental fields: a bibliometric and visualization mapping analysis Shaher H. Zyoud, Ahed H. Zyoud Environment, Development and Sustainability.2021; 23(6): 8895. CrossRef
A Bibliometric Network Analysis of Coronavirus during the First Eight Months of COVID-19 in 2020 Leonardo B. Furstenau, Bruna Rabaioli, Michele Kremer Sott, Danielli Cossul, Mariluza Sott Bender, Eduardo Moreno Júdice De Mattos Farina, Fabiano Novaes Barcellos Filho, Priscilla Paola Severo, Michael S. Dohan, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(3): 952. CrossRef
Nursing Challenges in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Era Jeung-Im Kim, Mi Yu Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2021; 51(1): 1. CrossRef
Network of institutions, source journals, and keywords on COVID-19 by Korean authors based on the Web of Science Core Collection in January 2021 Kyung Won Kim, Geume Hee Jeong Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 47. CrossRef
The nature of rapid response to COVID-19 in Latin America: an examination of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico Janaina Pamplona da Costa, André Luiz Sica de Campos, Paulo Roberto Cintra, Liz Felix Greco, Johan Hendrik Poker Online Information Review.2021; 45(4): 729. CrossRef
Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Production on Nursing Research in the Web of Science Gregorio Jesús Alcalá-Albert, María Elena Parra-González Education Sciences.2021; 11(9): 455. CrossRef
Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study Sun Huh Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef
Tracking the progress in COVID-19 and vaccine safety research – a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in Scopus database Tosin Yinka Akintunde, Shaojun Chen, Taha Hussein Musa, Felix Oluseyi Amoo, Adekunle Adedeji, Elhakim Ibrahim, Angwi Enow Tassang, Idriss Hussein Musa, Hassan Hussein Musa Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics.2021; 17(11): 3887. CrossRef
Visibility, collaboration and impact of the Cuban scientific output on COVID-19 in Scopus Ibraín Enrique Corrales-Reyes, Frank Hernández-García, Adrián Alejandro Vitón-Castillo, Christian R. Mejia Heliyon.2021; : e08258. CrossRef
A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF GREEN PRODUCTIVITY CONCEPT Erdinc KOC, Ahmed İhsan ŞİMŞEK İşletme Bilimi Dergisi.2021; 9(3): 393. CrossRef
The research on COVID-19 and economy from 2019 to 2020: analysis from the perspective of bibliometrics Nana Liu, Zeshui Xu, Marinko Skare Oeconomia Copernicana.2021; 12(2): 217. CrossRef
COVID-19 and publishing Kihong Kim Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 109. CrossRef
Reflections as 2020 comes to an end: the editing and educational environment during the COVID-19 pandemic, the power of Scopus and Web of Science in scholarly publishing, journal statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers Sun Huh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 44. CrossRef
Purpose This study examined changes in Asian journal editors’ daily life and work during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and investigated their opinions on expected changes, thereby providing preliminary data to support the future needs of journal editors.
Methods A survey questionnaire was developed and sent to 1,537 editors and staff of Asian scientific journals from July 13 to 19, 2020. The items gathered information on participants’ general characteristics, changes in daily life, changes in work life, anticipated future changes, and suggestions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results Of the 152 respondents (response rate, 9.7%), most were editors. Fifty-seven respondents (37.5%) felt very or extremely anxious about the COVID-19 pandemic, and 101 (68.4%) reported spending more time on the internet. The workload of editing, reviewing, and publishing had increased for about one-third of respondents (34.2%, n = 52). Forty-four respondents (28.9%) said that the number of submissions had increased. Of the 68 editors who had received manuscripts on COVID-19, 30 (44.1%) prioritized them. Most respondents (73.7%, n = 112) predicted that online-only journal publishing would expand after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Conclusion COVID-19 appears to be a source of anxiety to editors, which may be related to the increased time they spend on the internet. Some editors reported an increased workload. To promote online communication, a better environment and training tools are required. Editors and staff will need more opportunities to prepare for online publishing, as editors believed that the online-only publication of scholarly journals would accelerate after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Between panic and motivation: did the first wave of COVID-19 affect scientific publishing in Mediterranean countries? Mona Farouk Ali Scientometrics.2022; 127(6): 3083. CrossRef
Did anthropause generate a research pause during the pandemic? The experiences of a non‐medical journal Jiao Zhang Learned Publishing.2021; 34(3): 457. CrossRef
Was the number of submissions to scholarly journals in Korea affected by the COVID-19 pandemic? Sun Huh Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 117. CrossRef
COVID-19 and publishing Kihong Kim Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 109. CrossRef
Year in review and appreciation for 2020 reviewers Sue Kim Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing.2020; 26(4): 251. CrossRef
Reflections as 2020 comes to an end: the editing and educational environment during the COVID-19 pandemic, the power of Scopus and Web of Science in scholarly publishing, journal statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers Sun Huh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 44. CrossRef