Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Science Editing : Science Editing

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Performance"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Review
Trends in research on ChatGPT and adoption-related issues discussed in articles: a narrative review
Sang-Jun Kim
Sci Ed. 2024;11(1):3-11.   Published online December 18, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.321
  • 3,929 View
  • 143 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
This review aims to provide guidance for those contemplating the use of ChatGPT, by sharing research trends and evaluation results discussed in various articles. For an objective and quantitative analysis, 1,105 articles published over a 7-month period, from December 2022 to June 2023, following the release of ChatGPT were collected. These articles were sourced from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Additionally, 140 research articles were selected, including archived preprints and Korean articles, to evaluate the performance of ChatGPT. The analysis of research trends revealed that related communities are rapidly and actively responding: the educational community is redefining its directions, the copyright and patent community is monitoring lawsuits related to artificial intelligence creations, the government is establishing laws to regulate and prevent potential harm, the journal publishing community is setting standards for whether artificial intelligence can be considered an author, and the medical community is publishing numerous articles exploring the potential of ChatGPT to support medical experts. A comparative analysis of research articles on ChatGPT’s performance suggests that it could serve as a valuable assistant in human intellectual activities and academic processes. However, its practical application requires careful consideration to overcome certain limitations. Both the general public and researchers should assess the adoption of ChatGPT based on accurate information, such as that provided in this review.
Case Study
Citation performance of Indonesian scholarly journals indexed in Scopus from Scopus and Google Scholar
Lukman Lukman, Yan Rianto, Shidiq Al Hakim, Irene M Nadhiroh, Deden Sumirat Hidayat
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):53-58.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.119
  • 13,341 View
  • 318 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Citation frequency is an important factor for estimating the quality of a scientific journal, and the number of citations that an academic paper receives is often used as a measure of its scientific impact. This study aimed to characterize the citation performance of scientific journals published by Indonesian publishers that have been indexed in Scopus by analyzing the number of citations available in the Scopus database and Google Scholar. The results of the study identified 30 Indonesian journals that have been Scopus-indexed, of which 22 were listed in SCImago Journal Rank up to October 2017. Journals in the engineering field were the most cited, with 2,427 citations, including 930 self-citations. A large proportion of the citations were of recently-founded journals. The mean proportional difference in the citation frequency between Scopus and Google Scholar was 14.71%.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Examining the Effect of Innovative Behavior, and the Role of Contingency Plan on HEIs Effective Teaching
    Otto Berman Sihite, Poltak Sinaga, Dylmoon Hidayat, Rosdiana Sijabat
    Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental.2024; 18(5): e05178.     CrossRef
  • Indonesian Scientists’ Behavior Relative to Research Data Governance in Preventing WMD-Applicable Technology Transfer
    Lindung Parningotan Manik, Zaenal Akbar, Aris Yaman, Ariani Indrawati
    Publications.2022; 10(4): 50.     CrossRef
  • Evolution of the intellectual structure of clothing and textiles literature
    Joon-Ho Seon, Seong Eun Kim, Hyun-Jung Lee, Kyu-Hye Lee
    The Research Journal of the Costume Culture.2019; 27(4): 299.     CrossRef
  • Why and how do we keep editing local medical journals in an era of information overload?
    Viera Wardhani, Sam Mathew, Jeong-Wook Seo, Komang G. Wiryawan, Vivi Setiawaty, Burmaajav Badrakh
    Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 150.     CrossRef

Science Editing : Science Editing