KCSE
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
Training Material
- ChatGPT for editors: enhancing efficiency and effectiveness
- Yunhee Whang
- Sci Ed. 2024;11(1):84-90. Published online February 20, 2024
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.332
- 6,071 View
- 224 Download
- 6 Web of Science
- 3 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF - This tutorial examines how ChatGPT can assist journal editors in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of academic publishing. It highlights ChatGPT’s key characteristics, focusing on the use of “Custom instructions” to generate tailored responses and plugin integration for accessing up-to-date information. The tutorial presents practical advice and illustrative examples to demonstrate how editors can adeptly employ these features to improve their work practices. It covers the intricacies of developing advanced prompts and the application of zero-shot and few-shot prompting techniques across a range of editorial tasks, including literature reviews, training novice reviewers, and improving language quality. Furthermore, the tutorial addresses potential challenges inherent in using ChatGPT, which include a lack of precision and sensitivity to cultural nuances, the presence of biases, and a limited vocabulary in specialized fields, among others. The tutorial concludes by advocating for an integrated approach, combining ChatGPT’s technological advancements with the critical insight of human editors. This approach emphasizes that ChatGPT should be recognized not as a replacement for human judgment and expertise in editorial processes, but as a tool that plays a supportive and complementary role.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: a large language model-assisted systematic review
Dmitry Scherbakov, Nina Hubig, Vinita Jansari, Alexander Bakumenko, Leslie A Lenert
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.2025; 32(6): 1071. CrossRef - Efficacy of AI-Text Detection Tools in Distinguishing Student-Produced, AI-Edited, and AI-Generated Essays
Jessie S. Barrot, Ma. Rita R. Aranda
Technology, Knowledge and Learning.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - ¿Cómo está transformando la inteligencia artificial la comunicación científica? Desafíos, oportunidades y el papel de los actores involucrados: una revisión de alcance
Jairo Buitrago-Ciro, Estela Morales Campos, César Leonardo Villamizar Romero
Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información.2025; 39(104): 111. CrossRef
- The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: a large language model-assisted systematic review
Review
- Trends in research on ChatGPT and adoption-related issues discussed in articles: a narrative review
- Sang-Jun Kim
- Sci Ed. 2024;11(1):3-11. Published online December 18, 2023
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.321
- 14,632 View
- 389 Download
- 14 Web of Science
- 14 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
Supplementary Material - This review aims to provide guidance for those contemplating the use of ChatGPT, by sharing research trends and evaluation results discussed in various articles. For an objective and quantitative analysis, 1,105 articles published over a 7-month period, from December 2022 to June 2023, following the release of ChatGPT were collected. These articles were sourced from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Additionally, 140 research articles were selected, including archived preprints and Korean articles, to evaluate the performance of ChatGPT. The analysis of research trends revealed that related communities are rapidly and actively responding: the educational community is redefining its directions, the copyright and patent community is monitoring lawsuits related to artificial intelligence creations, the government is establishing laws to regulate and prevent potential harm, the journal publishing community is setting standards for whether artificial intelligence can be considered an author, and the medical community is publishing numerous articles exploring the potential of ChatGPT to support medical experts. A comparative analysis of research articles on ChatGPT’s performance suggests that it could serve as a valuable assistant in human intellectual activities and academic processes. However, its practical application requires careful consideration to overcome certain limitations. Both the general public and researchers should assess the adoption of ChatGPT based on accurate information, such as that provided in this review.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Evaluating AI Excellence: A Comparative Analysis of Generative Models in Library and Information Science
Raiyan Bin Reza, Md. Rifat Mahmud, S.M. Zabed Ahmed
Science & Technology Libraries.2025; 44(2): 136. CrossRef - Does ChatGPT affect users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online Q&A communities?
Guo Li, Mark Xuefang Zhu
Aslib Journal of Information Management.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Prediction of the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Through ChatGPT Among Costa Rican University Students: A PLS Model Based on UTAUT2
Julio Cabero-Almenara, Antonio Palacios-Rodríguez, Hazel de los Ángeles Rojas Guzmán, Victoria Fernández-Scagliusi
Applied Sciences.2025; 15(6): 3363. CrossRef - Artificial intelligence-assisted academic writing: recommendations for ethical use
Adam Cheng, Aaron Calhoun, Gabriel Reedy
Advances in Simulation.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - How appropriately can generative artificial intelligence platforms, including GPT-4, Gemini, Bing, and Wrtn, answer questions about colon cancer in the Korean language?
Sun Huh
Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(3): 190. CrossRef - Research trends and comparisons of major generative artificial intelligence platforms for systematic literature reviews
Sang-Jun Kim
Science Editing.2025; 12(2): 200. CrossRef - “It Becomes Very Intelligent”: ChatGPT as an Academic Reading Tool for Postgraduates
Afza Diyana Abdullah, Xiaoting Qiu, Huan Li, Muhammad Kamarul Kabilan
Reading Research Quarterly.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Applications of artificial intelligence in healthcare simulation: a model of thinking
Adam Cheng, Carolyn McGregor
Advances in Simulation.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - A Structural Model of Distance Education Teachers’ Digital Competencies for Artificial Intelligence
Julio Cabero-Almenara, Antonio Palacios-Rodríguez, Maria Isabel Loaiza-Aguirre, Dhamar Rafaela Pugla-Quirola
Education Sciences.2025; 15(10): 1271. CrossRef - Initial Validation of the IMPACT Model: Technological Appropriation of ChatGPT by University Faculty
Luz-M. Pereira-González, Andrea Basantes-Andrade, Miguel Naranjo-Toro, Mailevy Guia-Pereira
Education Sciences.2025; 15(11): 1520. CrossRef - The emergence of generative artificial intelligence platforms in 2023, journal metrics, appreciation to reviewers and volunteers, and obituary
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2024; 21: 9. CrossRef - Explosive increase and decrease in articles, citations, impact factor, and immediacy index during the COVID-19 pandemic: a bibliometric study
Sang-Jun Kim
Science Editing.2024; 11(2): 107. CrossRef - Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review
Sang-Jun Kim
Science Editing.2024; 11(2): 96. CrossRef - Appliances of Generative AI-Powered Language Tools in Academic Writing: A Scoping Review
Lilia Raitskaya, Elena Tikhonova
Journal of Language and Education.2024; 10(4): 5. CrossRef
- Evaluating AI Excellence: A Comparative Analysis of Generative Models in Library and Information Science
First
Prev
