Science Editing

Volume 7 February 2020

Editorials

Presidential address: How to cope with the present environment of scholarly journal publishing: Sun Huh; Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):1-3. Published online February 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.181

5,823 View
167 Download
2 Web of Science
1 Crossref

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Changes in bibliographic information associated with Korean scientific journals from 2011 to 2019
Yoon Joo Seo, Hye-Min Cho, Sun Huh
Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 11. CrossRef

Plans towards open access: Kihong Kim; Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):4-5. Published online February 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.182

4,566 View
85 Download

PDF

Review

History of the Scopus Expert Content Selection and Advisory Committee of Korea: Hyungsun Kim; Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):6-10. Published online February 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.183

5,738 View
121 Download
2 Web of Science
2 Crossref

Abstract PDF

With the objective of improving the quality of Korean journals and elevating them to international standards, the National Research Foundation of Korea, in consultation with Elsevier, formed the Scopus Expert Content Selection and Advisory Committee-Korea (ECSAC-Korea) as a local selection committee in August 2012. The committee reviews Korean journals for Scopus indexing and recommends them to the Scopus Content Selection and Advisory Board. In September 2019, ECSAC-Korea became part of the Korean Council of Science Editors (KCSE). This article describes the current status of Scopus indexing in Korea and the history, organizational structure, and role of ECSAC-Korea as part of the KCSE. The article also introduces the members of ECSAC-Korea and the KCSE steering committee for Scopus ECSAC-Korea, who have been active since September 2019.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Role of academic publishers in 10 years: a perspective from the Chairman of Elsevier
Youngsuk Chi
Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 46. CrossRef
Presidential address: How to cope with the present environment of scholarly journal publishing
Sun Huh
Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 1. CrossRef

Original Articles

Changes in bibliographic information associated with Korean scientific journals from 2011 to 2019: Yoon Joo Seo, Hye-Min Cho, Sun Huh; Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):11-15. Published online February 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.184

5,462 View
142 Download
4 Web of Science
4 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
This study aimed to examine how the bibliographic information of 558 journals that applied for the Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies funding in 2011 changed from 2011 to 2019, with the goal of informing the development of Korean scientific journals.
Methods
Between May and October 2012, bibliographic information from 558 journals was obtained from PDF files for the print versions of one issue of 2011 and the journal homepages. In August 2019, the bibliographic information of the same journals was traced based only on the journal websites. We compared bibliographic information.
Results
Excluding 14 journals that were discontinued or integrated with other journals prior to the follow-up in 2019, 544 journals were compared. Over the 8-year period, 121 journals underwent title changes. The number of journals with eISSNs (electronic International Standard Serial Number) increased from 214 (39.3%) in 2011 to 488 (89.7%) in 2019. “Aims and scope” descriptions were found for 291 journals (53.5%) in 2011 and 482 (88.6%) in 2019. The number of English-only journals increased from 163 (30.0%) to 227 (41.7%), and the number of journals with an open access policy rose from 92 (16.9%) to 315 (57.9%). Journals with DOI (digital object identifier) prefixes increased from 256 (47.1%) to 536 (98.5%).
Conclusion
The increased frequency of the above bibliographic information is evidence of the globalization of local journals. However, even in 2019, some journals still lacked the necessary bibliographic information. For better dissemination and promotion of Korean scientific journals, editors and publishers should more critically consider the proper inclusion of information on journal websites.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Comparison of the open access status and metrics of Scopus journals published in East Asian countries: a descriptive study
Eungi Kim, Da-Yeong Jeong
Science Editing.2023; 10(1): 57. CrossRef
Presidential address: the Korean Council of Science Editors as a board member of Crossref from March 2021 to February 2024
Sun Huh
Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 1. CrossRef
PubMed Central as a platform for the survival of open-access biomedical society journals published in Korea
Sun Huh
Science Editing.2021; 8(2): 153. CrossRef
Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377. CrossRef

An analysis of data paper templates and guidelines: types of contextual information described by data journals: Jihyun Kim; Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):16-23. Published online February 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.185

7,150 View
191 Download
9 Web of Science
11 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
Data papers are a promising genre of scholarly communication, in which research data are described, shared, and published. Rich documentation of data, including adequate contextual information, enhances the potential of data reuse. This study investigated the extent to which the components of data papers specified by journals represented the types of contextual information necessary for data reuse.
Methods
A content analysis of 15 data paper templates/guidelines from 24 data journals indexed by the Web of Science was performed. A coding scheme was developed based on previous studies, consisting of four categories: general data set properties, data production information, repository information, and reuse information.
Results
Only a few types of contextual information were commonly requested by the journals. Except data format information and file names, general data set properties were specified less often than other categories of contextual information. Researchers were frequently asked to provide data production information, such as information on the data collection, data producer, and related project. Repository information focused on data identifiers, while information about repository reputation and curation practices was rarely requested. Reuse information mostly involved advice on the reuse of data and terms of use.
Conclusion
These findings imply that data journals should provide a more standardized set of data paper components to inform reusers of relevant contextual information in a consistent manner. Information about repository reputation and curation could also be provided by data journals to complement the repository information provided by the authors of data papers and to help researchers evaluate the reusability of data.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Dissemination effect of data papers on scientific datasets
Hong Jiao, Yuhong Qiu, Xiaowei Ma, Bo Yang
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2024; 75(2): 115. CrossRef
Spectral Library of Plant Species from Montesinho Natural Park in Portugal
Isabel Pôças, Cátia Rodrigues de Almeida, Salvador Arenas-Castro, João C. Campos, Nuno Garcia, João Alírio, Neftalí Sillero, Ana C. Teodoro
Data.2024; 9(5): 65. CrossRef
Korean scholarly journal editors’ and publishers’ attitudes towards journal data sharing policies and data papers (2023): a survey-based descriptive study
Hyun Jun Yi, Youngim Jung, Hyekyong Hwang, Sung-Nam Cho
Science Editing.2023; 10(2): 141. CrossRef
The data paper as a sociolinguistic epistemic object: A content analysis on the rhetorical moves used in data paper abstracts
Kai Li, Chenyue Jiao
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2022; 73(6): 834. CrossRef
A Preliminary Analysis of Geography of Collaboration in Data Papers by S&T Capacity Index
Pei‐Ying Chen, Kai Li, Chenyue Jiao
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2022; 59(1): 642. CrossRef
Taxonomy 2.0: computer-aided identification tools to assist Antarctic biologists in the field and in the laboratory
Thomas Saucède, Marc Eléaume, Quentin Jossart, Camille Moreau, Rachel Downey, Narissa Bax, Chester Sands, Borja Mercado, Cyril Gallut, Régine Vignes-Lebbe
Antarctic Science.2021; 33(1): 39. CrossRef
Korean researchers’ motivations for publishing in data journals and the usefulness of their data: a qualitative study
Jungyeoun Lee, Jihyun Kim
Science Editing.2021; 8(2): 145. CrossRef
Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef
A Survey of Exclusively Data Journals and How They Are Indexed by Scientific Databases
Kai Li, Chuyi Lu, Chenyue Jiao
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2021; 58(1): 771. CrossRef
Three-stage publishing to support evidence-based management practice
Juan A. Marin-Garcia
WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management.2021; 12(2): 56. CrossRef
The role of the data paper in scholarly communication
Chenyue Jiao, Peter T. Darch
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef

Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in Korean academic society-published journals listed in Journal Citation Reports: Ye Jin Choi, Hyung Wook Choi, Soon Kim; Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):24-33. Published online February 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.186

6,769 View
137 Download
6 Web of Science
8 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
The “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” are of increasing importance in an open science environment as a way to increase the transparency and quality of academic society journals. However, little previous research has investigated the application of this new guideline in practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree to which this guideline is being applied by Korean academic society– published journals listed in Journal Citation Reports.
Methods
The researchers investigated the homepages of 59 Korean academic society– published journals to evaluate whether they had adopted the 33 items listed in the guideline. Based on the information available on the journals’ homepages, each item was classified as ‘yes’ or ‘no’ within the four categories of basic journal information, publication ethics, copyright and archiving information, and profit model.
Results
The basic journal information category was generally well-practiced, with the exceptions of the peer review process, readership, and author fees. The copyright and licensing information category was also well-practiced, with the exception of policies on posting accepted articles with third parties and archiving items. However, most items in the publication ethics category were not well practiced, with the exception of authorship and intellectual property. All items in the profit model category were infrequently implemented.
Conclusion
These findings serve as a good indicator for Korean journal editors of areas for improvement. It may be helpful to review journals’ publication policies and homepages to comply with international publishing standards.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The COPE / DOAJ / OASPA / WAME Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: A Critical Analysis
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Salim Moussa
ETHICS IN PROGRESS.2024; 15(1): 130. CrossRef
The Application of Open Science Potentials in Research Processes: A Comprehensive Literature Review
Maryam Zarghani, Leila Nemati-Anaraki, Shahram Sedghi, Abdolreza Noroozi Chakoli, Anisa Rowhani-Farid
Libri.2023; 73(2): 167. CrossRef
Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321. CrossRef
Congratulations on Child Health Nursing Research becoming a PubMed Central journal and reflections on its significance
Sun Huh
Child Health Nursing Research.2022; 28(1): 1. CrossRef
Marking the inclusion of the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing in PubMed Central and strategies to be promoted to a top-tier journal in the nursing category
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing.2022; 28(3): 165. CrossRef
Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef
The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20. CrossRef
How Annals of Dermatology Has Improved the Scientific Quality and Ethical Standards of its Articles in the Two-Year Period since October 2018
Sun Huh
Annals of Dermatology.2020; 32(5): 353. CrossRef

Characteristics of retracted articles based on retraction data from online sources through February 2019: Quan-Hoang Vuong, Viet-Phuong La, Manh-Tung Ho, Thu-Trang Vuong, Manh-Toan Ho; Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):34-44. Published online February 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.187

12,795 View
286 Download
22 Web of Science
19 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
Although retractions are commonly considered to be negative, the fact remains that they play a positive role in the academic community. For instance, retractions help scientific enterprise perform its self-correcting function and provide lessons for future researchers; furthermore, they represent the fulfillment of social responsibilities, and they enable scientific communities to offer better monitoring services to keep problematic studies in check. This study aims to provide a thorough overview of the practice of retraction in scientific publishing from the first incident to the present.
Methods
We built a database using SQL Server 2016 and homemade artificial intelligence tools to extract and classify data sources including RetractionWatch, official publishers’ archives, and online communities into ready-to-analyze groups and to scan them for new data. After data cleaning, a dataset of 18,603 retractions from 1,753 (when the first retracted paper was published) to February 2019, covering 127 research fields, was established.
Results
Notable retraction events include the rise in retracted articles starting in 1999 and the unusual number of retractions in 2010. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Elsevier, and Springer account for nearly 60% of all retracted papers globally, with Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers contributing the most retractions, even though it is not the organization that publishes the most journals. Finally, reasons for retraction are diverse but the most common is “fake peer review”.
Conclusion
This study suggests that the frequency of retraction has boomed in the past 20 years, and it underscores the importance of understanding and learning from the practice of retracting scientific articles.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Characteristics of retracted research papers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
Yuki Furuse
Frontiers in Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Retractions in arts and humanities: an analysis of the retraction notices
Ivan Heibi, Silvio Peroni
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities.2024; 39(2): 548. CrossRef
A comparative study on characteristics of retracted publications across different open access levels
Er-Te Zheng, Hui-Zhen Fu
Journal of Data and Information Science.2024; 9(2): 22. CrossRef
Streamlining the self-correction process: a review of the use of replication research by organizational scholars
Przemysław G. Hensel, Agnieszka Kacprzak
Journal of Organizational Change Management.2024; 37(3): 465. CrossRef
Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
Zafer Kocak
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Research done wrong: A comprehensive investigation of retracted publications in COVID-19
Somipam R. Shimray
Accountability in Research.2023; 30(7): 393. CrossRef
“Research exceptionalism” in the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of scientific retractions in Scopus
Priscila Rubbo, Caroline Lievore, Celso Biynkievycz Dos Santos, Claudia Tania Picinin, Luiz Alberto Pilatti, Bruno Pedroso
Ethics & Behavior.2023; 33(5): 339. CrossRef
Biased, wrong and counterfeited evidences published during the COVID-19 pandemic, a systematic review of retracted COVID-19 papers
Angelo Capodici, Aurelia Salussolia, Francesco Sanmarchi, Davide Gori, Davide Golinelli
Quality & Quantity.2023; 57(5): 4881. CrossRef
Are female scientists underrepresented in self-retractions for honest error?
Mariana D. Ribeiro, Jesus Mena-Chalco, Karina de Albuquerque Rocha, Marlise Pedrotti, Patrick Menezes, Sonia M. R. Vasconcelos
Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices
Soo Young Hwang, Dong Keon Yon, Seung Won Lee, Min Seo Kim, Jong Yeob Kim, Lee Smith, Ai Koyanagi, Marco Solmi, Andre F Carvalho, Eunyoung Kim, Jae Il Shin, John P A Ioannidis
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The relationship between methodological quality and the use of retracted publications in evidence syntheses
Caitlin J. Bakker, Nicole Theis-Mahon, Sarah Jane Brown, Maurice P. Zeegers
Systematic Reviews.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Retractions covered by retraction watch from 2017 to 2022: a perspective from Indian researchers
Somipam R. Shimray, Sakshi Tiwari, Chennupati Kodand Ramaiah
Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Non‐author entities accountable for retractions: A diachronic and cross‐disciplinary exploration of reasons for retraction
Shaoxiong (Brian) Xu, Guangwei Hu
Learned Publishing.2022; 35(2): 261. CrossRef
Correction of the Scientific Production: Publisher Performance Evaluation Using a Dataset of 4844 PubMed Retractions
Catalin Toma, Liliana Padureanu, Bogdan Toma
Publications.2022; 10(2): 18. CrossRef
Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers
Robin Haunschild, Lutz Bornmann
Scientometrics.2021; 126(6): 5181. CrossRef
Research ethics: a profile of retractions from world class universities
Caroline Lievore, Priscila Rubbo, Celso Biynkievycz dos Santos, Claudia Tânia Picinin, Luiz Alberto Pilatti
Scientometrics.2021; 126(8): 6871. CrossRef
Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills
Horacio Rivera, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction
Shaoxiong (Brian) Xu, Guangwei Hu
Accountability in Research.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Comprehensive Analysis of Retracted Publications in Dentistry: A 23-Year Review
Shannon Samuel, Joe Mathew Cherian, Abi M. Thomas, Stefano Corbella
International Journal of Dentistry.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef

Bibliographic and content analysis of articles on education from Vietnam indexed in Scopus from 2009 to 2018: Cuong Huu Nguyen, Loc Thi My Nguyen, Trung Tran, Tien-Trung Nguyen; Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):45-49. Published online February 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.188

6,903 View
183 Download
4 Web of Science
9 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
This study aimed to analyze the bibliographic characteristics and content of articles on education published in Scopus-indexed journals by authors with Vietnamese affiliations from 2009 to 2018.
Methods
Scopus was searched on July 6, 2019 using the search option “affiliation country,” with “Vietnam OR Viet Nam” as the country name, and “subject area” as “social sciences AND education.”
Results
A total of 193 articles were identified. They were classified by publication year, co-authors’ country, affiliation, subarea, journal, and author. Content analysis of these articles demonstrated that the number of publications on education from Vietnam in Scopus increased rapidly during the last 10 years. The top five countries of co-authors were Australia, the USA, New Zealand, the UK, and the Netherlands. The main research subfields were English-language teaching, pedagogy, and educational management.
Conclusion
Although Vietnamese education researchers collaborated with colleagues in developed countries to publish papers, there was still a lack of articles discussing global trends in education, such as cross-border education, equity in education, and international assessment programs.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Studies on Internationalization of the Curriculum: A Bibliometric Analysis From the Scopus Database
Do Hong Cuong, Do Thi Hong Lien, Le Van An Nguyen, Tran Thi Ha Giang, Ha Thi Lich, Tien-Trung Nguyen
European Journal of Educational Research.2024; volume-13-(volume-13-): 379. CrossRef
Metacognition in mathematics education: From academic chronicle to future research scenario–A bibliometric analysis with the Scopus database
Hoang Thi-Nga, Vu Thi-Binh, Tien-Trung Nguyen
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.2024; 20(4): em2427. CrossRef
Science mapping research on Career guidance in general schools: a bibliometric analysis from Scopus database, 1964–2022
Thi Hong-Hanh Pham, Thi Hong-Chi Le, Thi Hong-Lien Do, Phuong-Lien Lai, Thi-Trinh Do, Tien-Trung Nguyen
Cogent Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Professional development for science teachers: A bibliometric analysis from 2001 to 2021
Huong Thi Pham, Tu Cam Vu, Lam Tung Nguyen, Ngoc-Thuy Thi Vu, Thang Chien Nguyen, Hong-Hanh Thi Pham, Lien Phuong Lai, Hong-Chi Thi Le, Chi Hai Ngo
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.2023; 19(5): em2260. CrossRef
Learning Management System in Developing Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis Between 2005 and 2020
Phuong-Tam Pham, Do Thi Hong Lien, Hoang Cong Kien, Ngo Hai Chi, Phan Thi Tinh, Tung Do, Linh Chi Nguyen, Tien-Trung Nguyen
European Journal of Educational Research.2022; volume-11-(volume-11-): 1363. CrossRef
Yabancı diller bölümlerinde görev yapan öğretim üyelerinin Scopus veri tabanındaki yayın performanslarının değerlendirilmesi
Özge Nazlı DALGIÇ, Merve GELDİ, Erdoğan KARTAL
RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi.2022; (30): 991. CrossRef
Factors impacting international‐indexed publishing among Vietnamese educational researchers
Thao‐Phuong‐Thi Trinh, Trung Tran, Hien‐Thu‐Thi Le, Tien‐Trung Nguyen, Hiep‐Hung Pham
Learned Publishing.2020; 33(4): 419. CrossRef
A Bibliometric and Content Analysis of Articles in Remote Sensing From Vietnam Indexed in Scopus for the 2000–2019 Period
Binh Pham-Duc, Ho Nguyen, Cuong Le Minh, Linh Hoang Khanh, Tran Trung
Serials Review.2020; 46(4): 275. CrossRef
Cultivating Social Science Research in Vietnam: A Case of Collaboration between a Private Research Institute with International and Domestic Research Entities
Hiep-Hung Pham, Anh-Duc Hoang
SSRN Electronic Journal .2020;[Epub] CrossRef

Case Studys

Analysis of Korean journals rejected by Scopus since 2011: Hyunju Jang; Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):50-54. Published online February 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.189

4,852 View
143 Download

Abstract PDF: This paper aims to provide publishers and societies who plan to apply for their journals to be listed in Scopus with critical guidelines to evaluate their performance from an objective, globally-informed perspective. It presents a qualitative case study of how applications of Korean journals to Scopus have been evaluated over a 9-year period (2011–2019). A content analysis was conducted of 106 applications that were rejected by the Content Selection and Advisory Board, according to a combination of 14 quantitative and qualitative selection criteria. This case study was used to categorize instances of failure and to illustrate practical strategies for local journals to use when applying to Scopus based on the lessons to be learned from rejected cases. The results of the analysis show that local journals should enhance the quality of the articles they publish, review why the journal should be considered international, and clearly address editorial policies and the concept, scope, and strategies of the journal.

Proposal for the development of a national open access database in Vietnam and comparison with other Asian countries’ national literature databases: Loc My Thi Nguyen, Tien-Trung Nguyen, Thanh Thi Nghiem, Hien Thu Thi Le, Thao Phuong Thi Trinh, Thuan Van Pham, Thanh Chi Nguyen, Linh Khanh Hoang, Trung Tran; Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):55-60. Published online February 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.190

64,521 View
128 Download
2 Web of Science
3 Crossref

Abstract PDF

In the context of the need to ensure appropriate signalling of the publication of high-quality, international-calibre publications in Vietnam, as well as new policies to improve the quality and effectiveness of scientific research in Vietnam, it is practical to investigate the possibility of developing a national open access database (NOAD). This study aims to answer the question of whether it is necessary to establish a NOAD in Vietnam. We used document analysis to evaluate issues related to NOADs. The results of this study show the complexity, lack of consistency, and difficulty in obtaining practical statistics and assessing research and scientific records in Vietnam today. Furthermore, the findings of this study imply that it is necessary to establish a NOAD of scientific research in Vietnam. The information in this report can be used to develop a NOAD for Vietnam in particular, and for any country that lacks one in general.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A spike in the scientific output on social sciences in Vietnam for recent three years: Evidence from bibliometric analysis in Scopus database (2000–2019)
Binh Pham-Duc, Trung Tran, Thao-Phuong-Thi Trinh, Tien-Trung Nguyen, Ngoc-Trang Nguyen, Hien-Thu-Thi Le
Journal of Information Science.2022; 48(5): 623. CrossRef
Research on Industry 4.0 and on key related technologies in Vietnam: A bibliometric analysis using Scopus
Binh Pham‐Duc, Trung Tran, Hien‐Thu‐Thi Le, Nhi‐Thi Nguyen, Ha‐Thi Cao, Tien‐Trung Nguyen
Learned Publishing.2021; 34(3): 414. CrossRef
Comparative Analysis of National and International Educational Science Articles in Vietnam: Evidence from the Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion Structure
Thao Phuong Thi Trinh, Trung Tran, Tien-Trung Nguyen, Thanh Thi Nghiem, Nam Nguyen Danh
European Journal of Educational Research.2020; volume-9-2(volume-9-i): 1367. CrossRef

Current status of Indonesian journals in the field of Islamic economics and finance: Luqman Hakim Handoko; Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):61-64. Published online February 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.191

6,158 View
185 Download

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: This study aimed to explore the status of Indonesian journals in the discipline of Islamic economics and finance. In the last two decades, the emergence of Islamic economic journals was striking. As of November 2019, the Science and Technology Index (SINTA) contained 60 journals on Islamic economics, banking and finance, accounting, management and business, and philanthropy. To explore these journals, a content analysis was conducted using data in the SINTA database. Most of the Islamic economics and finance journals were in SINTA level 4 (out of 6). Only 8 journals were ranked in SINTA level 2, and none were in SINTA level 1. Based on these results, additional efforts are needed to improve journal quality. Moreover, many journals have not been indexed in SINTA, which might have good quality. The author suggests that further efforts be made to include Islamic economics and finance journals in other abstracting and indexing databases, such as the Directory of Open Access Journals, Moraref, and Garuda.

Essays

Solutions for identification problems: a look at the Research Organization Registry: Rachael Lammey; Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):65-69. Published online February 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.192

6,781 View
135 Download
16 Web of Science
18 Crossref

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Missing institutions in OpenAlex: possible reasons, implications, and solutions
Lin Zhang, Zhe Cao, Yuanyuan Shang, Gunnar Sivertsen, Ying Huang
Scientometrics.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Seek and you may (not) find: A multi-institutional analysis of where research data are shared
Lisa R. Johnston, Alicia Hofelich Mohr, Joel Herndon, Shawna Taylor, Jake R. Carlson, Lizhao Ge, Jennifer Moore, Jonathan Petters, Wendy Kozlowski, Cynthia Hudson Vitale, Ayesha Maqbool
PLOS ONE.2024; 19(4): e0302426. CrossRef
OpenCitations Meta
Arcangelo Massari, Fabio Mariani, Ivan Heibi, Silvio Peroni, David Shotton
Quantitative Science Studies.2024; 5(1): 50. CrossRef
Spatiotemporal mobility network of global scientists, 1970–2020
Tianyu Liu, Tao Pei, Zidong Fang, Mingbo Wu, Xiaohan Liu, Xiaorui Yan, Ci Song, Jingyu Jiang, Linfeng Jiang, Jie Chen
International Journal of Geographical Information Science.2024; : 1. CrossRef
Open Editors: A dataset of scholarly journals’ editorial board positions
Andreas Nishikawa-Pacher, Tamara Heck, Kerstin Schoch
Research Evaluation.2023; 32(2): 228. CrossRef
The current landscape of author guidelines in chemistry through the lens of research data sharing
Nicole A. Parks, Tillmann G. Fischer, Claudia Blankenburg, Vincent F. Scalfani, Leah R. McEwen, Sonja Herres-Pawlis, Steffen Neumann
Pure and Applied Chemistry.2023; 95(4): 439. CrossRef
Measuring the Concept of PID Literacy: User Perceptions and Understanding of PIDs in Support of Open Scholarly Infrastructure
George Macgregor, Barbara S. Lancho-Barrantes, Diane Rasmussen Pennington
Open Information Science.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The bibliometric journey towards technological and social change: A review of current challenges and issues
Daniel Torres-Salinas, Nicolás Robinson-García, Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras
El Profesional de la información.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Metadata in journal publishing
Joppe Bos, Kevin McCurley
TUGboat.2023; 44(1): 71. CrossRef
Open reproducible scientometric research with Alexandria3k
Diomidis Spinellis, Alberto Baccini
PLOS ONE.2023; 18(11): e0294946. CrossRef
A half-century of global collaboration in science and the “Shrinking World”
Keisuke Okamura
Quantitative Science Studies.2023; : 1. CrossRef
Packaging research artefacts with RO-Crate
Stian Soiland-Reyes, Peter Sefton, Mercè Crosas, Leyla Jael Castro, Frederik Coppens, José M. Fernández, Daniel Garijo, Björn Grüning, Marco La Rosa, Simone Leo, Eoghan Ó Carragáin, Marc Portier, Ana Trisovic, RO-Crate Community, Paul Groth, Carole Goble
Data Science.2022; 5(2): 97. CrossRef
The prevalence and impact of university affiliation discrepancies between four bibliographic databases—Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, and Microsoft Academic
Philip J. Purnell
Quantitative Science Studies.2022; 3(1): 99. CrossRef
Persistent Identification for Conferences
Julian Franken, Aliaksandr Birukou, Kai Eckert, Wolfgang Fahl, Christian Hauschke, Christoph Lange
Data Science Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Presidential address: the Korean Council of Science Editors as a board member of Crossref from March 2021 to February 2024
Sun Huh
Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 1. CrossRef
Affiliation Information in DataCite Dataset Metadata: a Flemish Case Study
Niek Van Wettere
Data Science Journal.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377. CrossRef
Obstacles to the reuse of study metadata in ClinicalTrials.gov
Laura Miron, Rafael S. Gonçalves, Mark A. Musen
Scientific Data.2020;[Epub] CrossRef

The rise of preprints and their value in social sciences and humanities: Quan-Hoang Vuong; Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):70-72. Published online February 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.193

6,088 View
169 Download
5 Web of Science
6 Crossref

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Preprinting in AI Ethics: Towards a Set of Community Guidelines
Henrik Skaug Sætra
SSRN Electronic Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321. CrossRef
The collective wisdom in the COVID-19 research: Comparison and synthesis of epidemiological parameter estimates in preprints and peer-reviewed articles
Yuejiao Wang, Zhidong Cao, Daniel Dajun Zeng, Qingpeng Zhang, Tianyi Luo
International Journal of Infectious Diseases.2021; 104: 1. CrossRef
Preprint acceptance policies of Asian academic society journals in 2020
Ye Jin Choi, Hyung Wook Choi, Soon Kim
Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 10. CrossRef
Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef
Policy Response, Social Media and Science Journalism for the Sustainability of the Public Health System Amid the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Vietnam Lessons
Viet-Phuong La, Thanh-Hang Pham, Manh-Toan Ho, Minh-Hoang Nguyen, Khanh-Linh P. Nguyen, Thu-Trang Vuong, Hong-Kong T. Nguyen, Trung Tran, Quy Khuc, Manh-Tung Ho, Quan-Hoang Vuong
Sustainability.2020; 12(7): 2931. CrossRef

Engagement and integrity as the core of communication with examples from Samsung Electronics: In Yong Rhee; Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):73-77. Published online February 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.194

5,639 View
97 Download

PDF

Plan S: Kihong Kim; Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):78-79. Published online February 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.195

4,390 View
108 Download
2 Web of Science
2 Crossref

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Open access status of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 26. CrossRef
Plans towards open access
Kihong Kim
Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 4. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 2
Next
Last

Previous issues