Science Editing

Volume 7 August 2020

Editorial

COVID-19 and publishing: Kihong Kim; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):109-110. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.203

5,097 View
144 Download
2 Web of Science
2 Crossref

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Between panic and motivation: did the first wave of COVID-19 affect scientific publishing in Mediterranean countries?
Mona Farouk Ali
Scientometrics.2022; 127(6): 3083. CrossRef
Did anthropause generate a research pause during the pandemic? The experiences of a non‐medical journal
Jiao Zhang
Learned Publishing.2021; 34(3): 457. CrossRef

Original Articles

Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on Asian scholarly journal editors’ daily life, work, and opinions on future journal development: Yeonok Chung, Sue Kim, Sun Huh; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):111-117. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.204

6,298 View
173 Download
7 Web of Science
6 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
This study examined changes in Asian journal editors’ daily life and work during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and investigated their opinions on expected changes, thereby providing preliminary data to support the future needs of journal editors.
Methods
A survey questionnaire was developed and sent to 1,537 editors and staff of Asian scientific journals from July 13 to 19, 2020. The items gathered information on participants’ general characteristics, changes in daily life, changes in work life, anticipated future changes, and suggestions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results
Of the 152 respondents (response rate, 9.7%), most were editors. Fifty-seven respondents (37.5%) felt very or extremely anxious about the COVID-19 pandemic, and 101 (68.4%) reported spending more time on the internet. The workload of editing, reviewing, and publishing had increased for about one-third of respondents (34.2%, n = 52). Forty-four respondents (28.9%) said that the number of submissions had increased. Of the 68 editors who had received manuscripts on COVID-19, 30 (44.1%) prioritized them. Most respondents (73.7%, n = 112) predicted that online-only journal publishing would expand after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Conclusion
COVID-19 appears to be a source of anxiety to editors, which may be related to the increased time they spend on the internet. Some editors reported an increased workload. To promote online communication, a better environment and training tools are required. Editors and staff will need more opportunities to prepare for online publishing, as editors believed that the online-only publication of scholarly journals would accelerate after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Between panic and motivation: did the first wave of COVID-19 affect scientific publishing in Mediterranean countries?
Mona Farouk Ali
Scientometrics.2022; 127(6): 3083. CrossRef
Did anthropause generate a research pause during the pandemic? The experiences of a non‐medical journal
Jiao Zhang
Learned Publishing.2021; 34(3): 457. CrossRef
Was the number of submissions to scholarly journals in Korea affected by the COVID-19 pandemic?
Sun Huh
Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 117. CrossRef
COVID-19 and publishing
Kihong Kim
Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 109. CrossRef
Year in review and appreciation for 2020 reviewers
Sue Kim
Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing.2020; 26(4): 251. CrossRef
Reflections as 2020 comes to an end: the editing and educational environment during the COVID-19 pandemic, the power of Scopus and Web of Science in scholarly publishing, journal statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 44. CrossRef

A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research published in nursing journals: Juyeon Oh, Aekyung Kim; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):118-124. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.205

8,089 View
293 Download
26 Web of Science
24 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
This bibliometric study investigated the current state of documents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) published in nursing journals. The analysis focused on the description of most productive journals, institutions, and countries, as well as the characteristics of the documents.
Methods
The publications analyzed in this study were retrieved from the Web of Science database with search keywords. The searches used to establish the study dataset were last updated on July 10, 2020. The inclusion criteria were relevant English-language publications in journals published in the Science Citation Index Expanded or Social Science Citation Index. Content analysis of original articles and reviews was done.
Results
An analysis of 125 publications on COVID-19 from 48 journals showed that the most productive journal and country were the Journal of Clinical Nursing (n = 18) and the USA (n = 53), respectively. Original articles (n = 27, 21.6%) and review papers (n = 4, 3.2%) accounted for 24.8% of the articles, and the highest number of papers were found in early access (published ahead of print) (n = 51, 40.8%) and Q1 journals (n = 73, 58.4%). The content analysis found 10 data-based original articles or reviews, which dealt with the topics of nurse training (n = 2), nurses’ psychosocial status (n = 2), nursing research methodology (n = 1), nursing guidelines (n = 4), and protection for nurses (n = 1).
Conclusion
This study presents the current situation of nursing research on COVID-19 based on an analysis of publications in nursing journals and provides meaningful information to nursing researchers and editorial board members. The number of data-based original articles on nursing related to COVID-19 remains low.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Description and Analysis of Research on Death and Dying during the COVID-19 Pandemic, Published in Nursing Journals Indexed in SCOPUS
Leticia Cuellar-Pompa, José Ángel Rodríguez-Gómez, María Mercedes Novo-Muñoz, Natalia Rodríguez-Novo, Yurena M. Rodríguez-Novo, Carlos-Enrique Martínez-Alberto
Nursing Reports.2024; 14(2): 655. CrossRef
Characteristics and quality of reporting qualitative nursing research related to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic search and critical review
Ian-In Vong, Monique Rothan-Tondeur, Rita Georges Nohra
BMC Nursing.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
An investigation of emerging COVID-19 research trends and future implications for LIS field: A bibliometric mapping and visualization
Arslan Sheikh, Nadeem Siddique, Saima Qutab, Muhammad Ajmal Khan, Khalid Mahmood
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.2023; 55(1): 3. CrossRef
Community-based tourism in East Asia: A bibliometric research note
Aaron Tham, Shirley Wei Lee Chin
Tourism and Hospitality Research.2023; 23(3): 459. CrossRef
Factors associated with preventive behaviors for COVID-19 among adolescents in South Korea
Sunhee Park, Sumi Oh
Journal of Pediatric Nursing.2022; 62: e69. CrossRef
Synergistic networks of COVID-19’s top papers
Nosrat Riahinia, Farshid Danesh, Somayeh GhaviDel
Library Hi Tech.2022; 40(2): 454. CrossRef
Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321. CrossRef
A Bibliometric Analysis on Global Psychological and Behavioral Research Landscape on COVID-19 Pandemic
Xilu Dong, Xuqiu Wei, Fei Shu, Qiang Su, Juntao Wang, Ning Liu, Junping Qiu
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(2): 879. CrossRef
A bibliometric analysis of COVID‐19 publications in nursing by visual mapping method
Ayşe Çiçek Korkmaz, Serap Altuntaş
Journal of Nursing Management.2022; 30(6): 1892. CrossRef
Between panic and motivation: did the first wave of COVID-19 affect scientific publishing in Mediterranean countries?
Mona Farouk Ali
Scientometrics.2022; 127(6): 3083. CrossRef
Eye-Related COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Production Indexed in Scopus
Verónica García-Pascual, Elvira García-Beltrán, Begoña Domenech-Amigot
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(16): 9927. CrossRef
Coronavirus disease-19 in environmental fields: a bibliometric and visualization mapping analysis
Shaher H. Zyoud, Ahed H. Zyoud
Environment, Development and Sustainability.2021; 23(6): 8895. CrossRef
A Bibliometric Network Analysis of Coronavirus during the First Eight Months of COVID-19 in 2020
Leonardo B. Furstenau, Bruna Rabaioli, Michele Kremer Sott, Danielli Cossul, Mariluza Sott Bender, Eduardo Moreno Júdice De Mattos Farina, Fabiano Novaes Barcellos Filho, Priscilla Paola Severo, Michael S. Dohan, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(3): 952. CrossRef
Nursing Challenges in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Era
Jeung-Im Kim, Mi Yu
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2021; 51(1): 1. CrossRef
Network of institutions, source journals, and keywords on COVID-19 by Korean authors based on the Web of Science Core Collection in January 2021
Kyung Won Kim, Geume Hee Jeong
Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 47. CrossRef
The nature of rapid response to COVID-19 in Latin America: an examination of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico
Janaina Pamplona da Costa, André Luiz Sica de Campos, Paulo Roberto Cintra, Liz Felix Greco, Johan Hendrik Poker
Online Information Review.2021; 45(4): 729. CrossRef
Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Production on Nursing Research in the Web of Science
Gregorio Jesús Alcalá-Albert, María Elena Parra-González
Education Sciences.2021; 11(9): 455. CrossRef
Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef
Tracking the progress in COVID-19 and vaccine safety research – a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in Scopus database
Tosin Yinka Akintunde, Shaojun Chen, Taha Hussein Musa, Felix Oluseyi Amoo, Adekunle Adedeji, Elhakim Ibrahim, Angwi Enow Tassang, Idriss Hussein Musa, Hassan Hussein Musa
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics.2021; 17(11): 3887. CrossRef
Visibility, collaboration and impact of the Cuban scientific output on COVID-19 in Scopus
Ibraín Enrique Corrales-Reyes, Frank Hernández-García, Adrián Alejandro Vitón-Castillo, Christian R. Mejia
Heliyon.2021; : e08258. CrossRef
A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF GREEN PRODUCTIVITY CONCEPT
Erdinc KOC, Ahmed İhsan ŞİMŞEK
İşletme Bilimi Dergisi.2021; 9(3): 393. CrossRef
The research on COVID-19 and economy from 2019 to 2020: analysis from the perspective of bibliometrics
Nana Liu, Zeshui Xu, Marinko Skare
Oeconomia Copernicana.2021; 12(2): 217. CrossRef
COVID-19 and publishing
Kihong Kim
Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 109. CrossRef
Reflections as 2020 comes to an end: the editing and educational environment during the COVID-19 pandemic, the power of Scopus and Web of Science in scholarly publishing, journal statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 44. CrossRef

Crossref at 20 years: what do the community need?: Rachael Lammey; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):125-129. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.206

5,009 View
87 Download
4 Web of Science
5 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
The 20th anniversary of Crossref is a good point to evaluate where Crossref stands with the communities it supports so that it can be in a position to serve their needs in the future.
Methods
This evaluation took the form of a survey and a series of interviews run by Shift Learning in mid-2019.
Results
Results are presented in the form of a report authored by Shift Learning which is discussed in this paper.
Conclusion
Overall, Crossref is appreciated and provides value for the scholarly community. However, it needs to make sure that it continues to serve key stakeholders, ensure that core systems work smoothly for all members and that they balance the needs of its different sizes of members and those who subscribe to or use the Crossref metadata. The report from Shift Learning makes specific recommendations regarding pricing, products and services and, communications which Crossref should consider to continue to address the needs of its diverse stakeholders

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
Jae Hwa Chang
Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69. CrossRef
Presidential address: the Korean Council of Science Editors as a board member of Crossref from March 2021 to February 2024
Sun Huh
Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 1. CrossRef
Instructions for Authors Submitting Papers to Electrochemistry

Electrochemistry.2021; 89(Announceme): S20. CrossRef
Instructions for Authors Submitting Papers to Electrochemistry

Electrochemistry.2021; 89(Announceme): S1. CrossRef
Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377. CrossRef

Data journals: types of peer review, review criteria, and editorial committee members’ positions: Sunkyung Seo, Jihyun Kim; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):130-135. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.207

7,753 View
168 Download
3 Web of Science
4 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
This study analyzed the peer review systems, criteria, and editorial committee structures of data journals, aiming to determine the current state of data peer review and to offer suggestions.
Methods
We analyzed peer review systems and criteria for peer review in nine data journals indexed by Web of Science, as well as the positions of the editorial committee members of the journals. Each data journal’s website was initially surveyed, and the editors-in-chief were queried via email about any information not found on the websites. The peer review criteria of the journals were analyzed in terms of data quality, metadata quality, and general quality.
Results
Seven of the nine data journals adopted single-blind and open review peer review methods. The remaining two implemented modified models, such as interactive and community review. In the peer review criteria, there was a shared emphasis on the appropriateness of data production methodology and detailed descriptions. The editorial committees of the journals tended to have subject editors or subject advisory boards, while a few journals included positions with the responsibility of evaluating the technical quality of data.
Conclusion
Creating a community of subject experts and securing various editorial positions for peer review are necessary for data journals to achieve data quality assurance and to promote reuse. New practices will emerge in terms of data peer review models, criteria, and editorial positions, and further research needs to be conducted.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Unleashing the power of AI in science-key considerations for materials data preparation
Yongchao Lu, Hong Wang, Lanting Zhang, Ning Yu, Siqi Shi, Hang Su
Scientific Data.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Dissemination effect of data papers on scientific datasets
Hong Jiao, Yuhong Qiu, Xiaowei Ma, Bo Yang
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2024; 75(2): 115. CrossRef
The data paper as a sociolinguistic epistemic object: A content analysis on the rhetorical moves used in data paper abstracts
Kai Li, Chenyue Jiao
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2022; 73(6): 834. CrossRef
Korean researchers’ motivations for publishing in data journals and the usefulness of their data: a qualitative study
Jungyeoun Lee, Jihyun Kim
Science Editing.2021; 8(2): 145. CrossRef

Status of the data sharing policies of scholarly journals published in Brazil, France, and Korea and listed in both the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking and the Web of Science: Geum Hee Jeong; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):136-141. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.208

6,327 View
101 Download
8 Web of Science
6 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
The present study analyzed the current status of the data sharing policies of journals published in Brazil, France, and Korea that were listed in the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking and Web of Science Core Collection.
Methods
Web of Science journals were selected from the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking. The homepages of all target journals were searched for the presence of statements on data sharing policies, including clinical trial data sharing policies, the level of the policies, and actual statements of data availability in articles.
Results
Out of 565 journals from these three countries, 118 (20.9%) had an optional data sharing policy, and one had a mandatory data sharing policy. Harvard Dataverse was the repository of one journal. The number of journals that had adopted a data sharing policy was 11 (6.7%) for Brazil, 64 (27.6%) for France, and 44 (25.9%) for Korea. One journal from Brazil and 20 journals from Korea had adopted clinical trial data sharing policies in accordance with the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Statements of data sharing were found in articles from two journals.
Conclusion
Journals from France and Korea adopted data sharing policies more actively than those from Brazil. However, the actual implementation of these policies through descriptions of data availability in articles remains rare. In many journals that appear to have data sharing policies, those policies may just reflect a standard description by the publisher, especially in France. Actual data sharing was not found to be frequent.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Journal metrics, document network, and conceptual and social structures of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology from 2017 to July 2022: a bibliometric study
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2023; 76(1): 3. CrossRef
Korean scholarly journal editors’ and publishers’ attitudes towards journal data sharing policies and data papers (2023): a survey-based descriptive study
Hyun Jun Yi, Youngim Jung, Hyekyong Hwang, Sung-Nam Cho
Science Editing.2023; 10(2): 141. CrossRef
Research data policies of journals in the Chinese Science Citation Database based on the language, publisher, discipline, access model and metrics
Yu Wang, Beibei Chen, Liangbin Zhao, Yuanxiang Zeng
Learned Publishing.2022; 35(1): 30. CrossRef
Congratulations on Child Health Nursing Research becoming a PubMed Central journal and reflections on its significance
Sun Huh
Child Health Nursing Research.2022; 28(1): 1. CrossRef
Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377. CrossRef
How Annals of Dermatology Has Improved the Scientific Quality and Ethical Standards of its Articles in the Two-Year Period since October 2018
Sun Huh
Annals of Dermatology.2020; 32(5): 353. CrossRef

Influence of the top 10 journal publishers listed in Journal Citation Reports based on six indicators: Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):142-148. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.209

7,890 View
217 Download
8 Web of Science
10 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
: An accurate evaluation of the influence of the largest publishers in world journal publishing is a starting point for negotiating journal subscriptions and an important issue for research libraries. This study was conducted to evaluate the influence of the largest publishers based on Journal Citation Reports (JCR) indicators.
Methods
From JCR 2014 to 2018 data, a unique journal list by publisher was created in Excel. The top 10 publishers were selected and evaluated in terms of the average share of six JCR indicators including the impact factor, Eigenfactor score, and article influence score, along with the number of journals, articles, and citations.
Results
The top three publishers accounted for about 50% of the JCR indicators, the top five for 60%, and the top 10 for 70%. Therefore, the concentration of the top three publishers, with a share exceeding 50% for five indicators, was more intensive than has been reported in previous studies. For the top 10 publishers, not only the number of journals and articles, but also citations and the impact factor, which reflect the practical use of journals, were increasing.
Conclusion
These evaluation results will be important to research libraries and librarians in deciding upon journal subscriptions using publisher information, to journal publishers trying to list their journals in JCR, and to consortium operators to negotiate strategically. Using the unique journal list created in this research process, various follow-up studies are possible. However, it is also urgent to build a standardized world journal list with accurate information.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Do Changes in Journal Rank Influence Publication Output? Evidence from China
Zhuanlan Sun, Chenwei Zhang, Ka Lok Pang, Ying Tang, Yiwei Li
Scientometrics.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Publishing international library and information science journals: The changing landscape
Eungi Kim
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.2023; 55(2): 478. CrossRef
Mobile computer-supported collaborative learning for mathematics: A scoping review
Rex P. Bringula, Francis Arlando L. Atienza
Education and Information Technologies.2023; 28(5): 4893. CrossRef
Publishing trends of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports during the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive study
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Science Editing.2023; 10(1): 78. CrossRef
Changes in article share and growth by publisher and access type in Journal Citation Reports 2016, 2018, and 2020
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 30. CrossRef
Factors, Components and Dynamics: Investigation of Journal Self-Citation and Citation by Equal Opportunity Model
Yangping Zhou
SSRN Electronic Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Open access status of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 26. CrossRef
Influence of open access journals on the research community in Journal Citation Reports
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 32. CrossRef
Self-citation and citation of top journal publishers and their interpretation in the journal-discipline context
Yangping Zhou
Scientometrics.2021; 126(7): 6013. CrossRef
Market share of the largest publishers in Journal Citation Reports based on journal price and article processing charge
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 149. CrossRef

Market share of the largest publishers in Journal Citation Reports based on journal price and article processing charge: Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):149-155. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.210

9,708 View
286 Download
14 Web of Science
15 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
There are growing questions about the market share of the largest publishers. Although evaluations based on Journal Citation Reports (JCR) are important, librarians are more interested in journal costs. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of estimating the market share of the largest publishers listed in JCR using the journal subscription price (journal price) and article processing charge (APC). Methods: The top 10 publishers were selected based on six indicators in JCR 2014 to 2018, and then their journal prices and APCs were investigated according to list prices. Other prior studies were also compared to estimate their market share more realistically because list and actual prices are not identical. Results: The estimated average price of subscription journals in JCR was 2,300 US dollars and the average APC for an article was 2,652 US dollars. The APC per article was more expensive than the average journal price. Based on journal price and APC, the market influence of the top three publishers was 48.0%, but their market share was estimated to be 55.2% when annual reports and other studies were combined with this study. The difference was due to Elsevier’s journal costs, as Elsevier’s market share was higher than its market influence. Conclusion: APCs require additional budgetary resources from institutions, but are another revenue source for publishers. Librarians need to reflect APC spending in journal subscription negotiations with the largest publishers. To clarify the market share more accurately, it is necessary to share information on subscription and APC costs paid by institutions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Choice of Open Access in Elsevier Hybrid Journals
Sumiko Asai
Publishing Research Quarterly.2024; 40(1): 1. CrossRef
Determinants of article processing charges for hybrid and gold open access journals
Sumiko Asai
Information Discovery and Delivery.2023; 51(2): 121. CrossRef
Publishing trends of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports during the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive study
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Science Editing.2023; 10(1): 78. CrossRef
Books under threat: Open access publishing and the neo‐liberal academy
Matthew Gandy
Area.2023; 55(4): 565. CrossRef
Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review
Ángel Borrego
Learned Publishing.2023; 36(3): 359. CrossRef
Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine: Annual Update on Bibliometric Indicators Including Scopus Quartile (Q3)
Alexader A. Mzhelsky
Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine.2023; 22(4): 8. CrossRef
Changes in article share and growth by publisher and access type in Journal Citation Reports 2016, 2018, and 2020
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 30. CrossRef
Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research
Lin Zhang, Yahui Wei, Ying Huang, Gunnar Sivertsen
Scientometrics.2022; 127(12): 7653. CrossRef
Factors, components and dynamics: investigation of journal self-citation and citation by equal opportunity model
Yangping Zhou
Heliyon.2022; : e10292. CrossRef
Creating shared value: A bibliometric review of organizational learning and corporate entrepreneurship
Hardjanto Nusantoro, Erna Maulina, Anang Muftiadi, Margo Purnomo
Corporate Law and Governance Review.2022; 4(1): 54. CrossRef
Factors, Components and Dynamics: Investigation of Journal Self-Citation and Citation by Equal Opportunity Model
Yangping Zhou
SSRN Electronic Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Influence of open access journals on the research community in Journal Citation Reports
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 32. CrossRef
Open access status of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 26. CrossRef
Collaboration between research institutes and large and small publishers for publishing open access journals
Sumiko Asai
Scientometrics.2021; 126(6): 5245. CrossRef
Self-citation and citation of top journal publishers and their interpretation in the journal-discipline context
Yangping Zhou
Scientometrics.2021; 126(7): 6013. CrossRef

Historical diagnostic and therapeutic changes of ischemic stroke based on the highly cited articles: Yerim Kim, Dae Young Yoon, Jee-Eun Kim, Ju-Hun Lee, Hong-Ki Song, Jong Seok Bae; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):156-162. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.211

5,864 View
94 Download
2 Web of Science
2 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
Stroke is a global economic burden of health, which means that it is critical to evaluate changes of optimal diagnoses and treatments. The aim of the study reported herein was to identify the most-cited articles in the field of ischemic stroke and assess their characteristics. Methods: We searched all included articles that had been cited more than 100 times using the “Cited Reference Search” in February 2016 from Web of Science Core Collection. Among a total of 2,651 articles, we excluded articles on basic science and which involved only hemorrhagic strokes and identified the top-100 cited articles on ischemic stroke. Results: The number of citations for the articles analyzed in this study ranged from 5,182 to 580. Most of the articles were published in The Lancet (25%) and Stroke (23%), and originated from the United States of America (n=44). Most of them were original articles (65%) and dealt with stroke risk factors (32%) and stroke management (30%). A novel study of hyperacute treatment involving recombinant-tissue plasminogen activator was described in the top-ranked article. Conclusion: Reviews on highly cited articles can help physicians identify trends in the diagnosis and treatment of ischemic stroke in the past. This bibliometric analysis can provide a unique perspective on historical developments in this field.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321. CrossRef
Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef

Bibliometric analysis of flipped classroom publications from the Web of Science Core Collection published from 2000 to 2019: Hsin-Luen Tsai, Jia-Fen Wu; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):163-168. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.212; Correction in: Sci Ed 2021;8(1):129

6,997 View
213 Download
6 Web of Science
5 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
This study analyzed the bibliometric characteristics of flipped classroom publications in the Social Science Citation Index and Science Citation Index Expanded from 2000 to 2019. Methods: The terms related to “flipped classroom” and “inverted learning” were the keywords for searching journal articles on January 3, 2020. Results: There are 645 articles (including 33 early-access articles), representing 1,938 authors in the 210 journals scanned. The United States, China, and Taiwan were three leading countries/regions in this field. In the top 10 countries, to 10 institutions, the top eight most-cited journals were identified by either the number of publications or the number of citations. Hot-spot themes from the 24 highly-cited articles and author keyword co-occurrence analysis focus on empirical research in the flipped classroom, the overall feasibility of the flipped classroom course design and practical model, and students’ performances, and student-regulated learning (active learning and readiness) outcomes. Conclusion: TThe results indicate that the United States dominated flipped classroom research, originating most of the highly-cited articles, having more prolific authors, and presenting the most-cited institutions. Furthermore, little research has been undertaken into arriving at an understanding of evidentiary effectiveness or consistency in a flipped classroom. Based on the trends identified, we need a call for more specific types of research into the effectiveness of flipped classroom studies and systematic reviews.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Teaching English as a Foreign Language in Higher Education using flipped learning/flipped classrooms: a literature review
Rosemary Fisher, Quyen Tran, Elena Verezub
Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching.2024; 18(4): 332. CrossRef
RETHİNKİNG CLASSROOMS: A COMPREHENSİVE ANALYSİS OF POSTGRADUATE THESES ON THE FLİPPED CLASSROOM MODEL İN TURKEY
Beytullah Karagöz, Hakan Karatop, Ali Erdönmez
Journal of Advanced Education Studies.2024; 6(1): 134. CrossRef
Ters Yüz Öğrenme Konusunda Yapılan Araştırmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi
Ali Ateş, Halük Ünsal
Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi.2024; 22(2): 1084. CrossRef
A conceptual review of the effectiveness of flipped learning in vocational learners’ cognitive skills and emotional states
Xiuqin Zhou
Frontiers in Psychology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Review of flipped learning in engineering education: Scientific mapping and research horizon
Md Abdullah Al Mamun, Md Abul Kalam Azad, Md Abdullah Al Mamun, Michael Boyle
Education and Information Technologies.2022; 27(1): 1261. CrossRef

Bibliometric analysis and visualization of Islamic economics and finance articles indexed in Scopus by Indonesian authors: Luqman Hakim Handoko; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):169-176. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.213

7,577 View
427 Download
15 Web of Science
18 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
This study aimed to analyze the bibliometric characteristics and trends of articles on Islamic economics and finance (IEF) indexed in Scopus by Indonesian authors.
Methods
Data were retrieved from the Scopus database. Articles were searched in June 2020 with the limitation of Indonesian authors or affiliation. The keywords used in this study included IEF, and variations thereof, with the search filtered by Indonesian affiliation. Simple statistical methods were used, and a bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer software. This study visualized patterns of the co-occurrence of keywords, citations of documents, co-citation relationships, and bibliographic coupling.
Results
The number of studies in the field of IEF increased in recent years. Articles on IEF have been published in more than 150 journals, among which the most popular was Talent Development and Excellence. Collaboration among authors reached 33 countries, most prominently Malaysia. Certain keywords, such as halal tourism, zakat, and Islamic microfinance, have become the most popular in the last few years. The bibliometric analysis showed that 24 documents had the largest citation relationship, 52 journals had the largest co-citation network, and 172 documents had the largest bibliographic coupling relationship.
Conclusion
Research in the field of IEF by Indonesian authors has increased rapidly, with extensive collaboration. Halal tourism is among the most popular research topics in the last few years and is a prospective topic for future research. Moreover, the results showed that sources on IEF were widely used as references.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A bibliometric review of Islamic economics and finance bibliometric papers: an overview of the future of Islamic economics and finance
Denizar Abdurrahman Mi'raj, Salih Ulev
Qualitative Research in Financial Markets.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Microfinance: A bibliometric exploration of the knowledge landscape
Debidutta Pattnaik, Sougata Ray, M. Kabir Hassan
Heliyon.2024; 10(10): e31216. CrossRef
Halal supply chain: a bibliometric analysis
Aam Slamet Rusydiana, Mohammad Iqbal Irfany, Aisyah As-Salafiyah, Marco Tieman
Journal of Islamic Marketing.2023; 14(12): 3009. CrossRef
Evolution in Islamic capital market: a bibliometric analysis
Roslina Mohamad Shafi, Yan-Ling Tan
Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research.2023; 14(8): 1474. CrossRef
Islamic Economy and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis Using R
Suddin Lada, Brahim Chekima, Rudy Ansar, Mohamad Isa Abdul Jalil, Lim Ming Fook, Caroline Geetha, Mohamed Bouteraa, Mohd Rahimie Abdul Karim
Sustainability.2023; 15(6): 5174. CrossRef
Islamic banking spin-offs decision: A bibliometric review
Zulfikar Bagus Pambuko, Jaka Sriyana
Cogent Business & Management.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Bibliographic analysis on real estate finance literature: A study on articles in Web of Science Core Collection Database
Nurgün KOMŞUOĞLU YILMAZ
Business Economics and Management Research Journal.2023; 6(1): 57. CrossRef
Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk kavramının bibliyometrik analizi: 2017-2021 dönemine bir bakış
Abdullah Zübeyr AKMAN, Meral ERDİRENCELEBİ
Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi.2023; 16(3): 597. CrossRef
The Future Growth for Islamic Microfinance in Indonesia: Baitul Maal Wat Tamwil Domains
Haerudin Haerudin, Annisa Fajri, Syadiyah Abdul Shukor, Kartiko Adi Wibowo
SSRN Electronic Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
A bibliometric analysis of halal tourism: future research agenda
Lalu Supardin, Mohammad Suyanto, Anas Hidayat, Tony Wijaya
Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Prominent scholars in Islamic economics and allied disciplines: a bibliometric review
Mohamed Aslam Akbar, Mohamed Asmy Mohd Thas Thaker, Mustafa Omar Mohammed, Nik Hziman Nik Mat, Hassanuddeen Abd.Aziz
Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Islamic Economics Answers to a Wide Range of Contemporary Socio-Economic Challenges
Reza Muhammad Rizqi, Hartini
Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba.2022; : 143. CrossRef
A bibliometric analysis of cold spray coating process using VOSviewer
Ayaz Mehmood, Mohammad Zunaid, Ashok Kumar Madan
Materials Today: Proceedings.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Performance of Indonesian Scopus journals in the area of agricultural and biological sciences
Prakoso Bhairawa Putera, Ida Widianingsih, Sinta Ningrum, Suryanto Suryanto, Yan Rianto
Science Editing.2022; 10(1): 100. CrossRef
A bibliometric analysis of the International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management
Mücahit Özdemir, Mervan Selçuk
International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management.2021; 14(4): 767. CrossRef
What do we know about zakat literature? A bibliometric review
Muneer M. Alshater, Ram Al Jaffri Saad, Norazlina Abd. Wahab, Irum Saba
Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research.2021; 12(4): 544. CrossRef
Better, Faster, Stronger: The Evolution of Co-authorship in International Management Research Between 1990 and 2016
Oliver Wieczorek, Markus Eckl, Madeleine Bausch, Erik Radisch, Christoph Barmeyer, Malte Rehbein
SAGE Open.2021; 11(4): 215824402110615. CrossRef
Research Trends in The Field of Islamic Social Finance
Jamila Abubakar, Ahmet Aysan
SSRN Electronic Journal .2021;[Epub] CrossRef

A bibliometric analysis of articles on innovation systems in Scopus journals written by authors from Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia: Prakoso Bhairawa Putera, Suryanto Suryanto, Sinta Ningrum, Ida Widianingsih; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):177-183. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.214

7,254 View
227 Download
5 Web of Science
9 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
The aim of this study was to analyze the bibliometric characteristics of articles on innovation systems published in Scopus-indexed journals by authors with Indonesian affiliations from 1998 to 2019, in comparison with those published by authors from Singapore and Malaysia.
Methods
We conducted a bibliometric and content analysis of publications in the Scopus database. A total of 138 articles from Indonesia, 209 articles from Singapore, and 309 articles from Malaysia were analyzed. They were classified by publication year, authors, co-authors’ country, affiliation, keywords, and journal title.
Results
Authors with affiliations from Malaysia were more productive than authors from Singapore and Indonesia during 1998 to 2019. In terms of the quality of papers, Singapore had more productive authors than Malaysia and Indonesia based on the citation frequency.
Conclusion
Although fewer articles on innovation systems were published by authors from Indonesia than by those from Malaysia and Singapore, the recent increase in the number of publications by Indonesian authors suggests that number of articles from Indonesia will soon surpass those from the other two countries. International collaboration will help accelerate the number of publications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The typology and determinant of performance measurement for public sector organizations – a literature review
Doris Febriyanti, Ida Widianingsih, Asep Sumaryana, Rd. Ahmad Buchari
Cogent Business & Management.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Big data security & individual (psychological) resilience: A review of social media risks and lessons learned from Indonesia
Abdillah Abdillah, Ida Widianingsih, Rd Ahmad Buchari, Heru Nurasa
Array.2024; 21: 100336. CrossRef
Three decades research in the field of business ecosystem
Ahmad Rifa’i, Sam’un Jaja Raharja, Rivani Rivani, Ratih Purbasari
Cogent Business & Management.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Global discourse of restorative justice studies: an analysis of three decade bibliometric analysis (1993-2022)
Amelya Gustina, Tatik Sunatri, Maurice Rogers, Aghia Khumaesi Suud, Jajang Aminullah Alwahdy
Contemporary Justice Review.2023; 26(4): 343. CrossRef
Three Decades of Discourse on Science, Technology and Innovation in National Innovation System: A Bibliometric Analysis (1990 – 2020)
Prakoso Bhairawa Putera, Suryanto Suryanto, Sinta Ningrum, Ida Widianingsih, Yan Rianto
Cogent Social Sciences.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Bibliometric Analysis of the Utilisation of FINDRISC in Patients with Diabetes: 2005-2021
M. Rifqi Rokhman, Bustanul Arifin, Zulkarnain Zulkarnain, Saidah Rauf, Dyah Aryani Perwitasari
Borneo Journal of Pharmacy.2022; 5(3): 288. CrossRef
Bibliometric Analysis Of Fisheries Policy Articles In The Journal Scopus Written By Authors From Affiliates Of The 10 Best Universities In Indonesia
Eki Darmawan, Ida Widianingsih, Rahman Mulyawan, Mudiyati Rahmatunnisa
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.2022; 1095(1): 012014. CrossRef
Indonesia’s Place in the Research Landscape of Southeast Asia
Dalibor Fiala
Unisia.2022; : 45. CrossRef
Evolutionary Study of Watershed Governance Research: A Bibliometric Analysis
Ida Widianingsih, Caroline Paskarina, Riswanda Riswanda, Prakoso Bhairawa Putera
Science & Technology Libraries.2021; 40(4): 416. CrossRef

Case Study

Analysis of consultations by the Committee for Publication Ethics of the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors: You Sun Kim, Dong Soo Han; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):184-188. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.215

5,637 View
114 Download
4 Web of Science
3 Crossref

Abstract PDF

This study aimed to analyze the inquiries on research and publication ethics submitted to the Committee for Publication Ethics of the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. A total of 80 inquiries were initiated over the course of 3 years, from April 2017 to March 2020. Based on a categorization of these inquiries, four common topics are discussed in detail. We present specific cases derived from actual situations, and the steps taken in processing these inquiries. The number of inquiries by topic was as follows: duplicate publications (12), secondary publications (11), authorship disputes (11), informed consent (6), proceedings (5), copyright (5), institutional review board approval (5), plagiarism (4), corrections (4), and others (17). Cases of duplicate publication and authorship disputes can be treated according to the flow chart of the Committee on Publication Ethics of the United Kingdom. Secondary publications may be permitted if the readers or audiences are different and both journals’ editors grant permission. Editors should be cautious about publishing cases without informed consent, even in the absence of identifiable photos, because patients or their families may be able to identify the cases. An adequate awareness of ethical considerations relevant to publication can help reduce the number of instances of research and publication ethics misconduct.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Ethics Committees: Structure, Roles, and Issues
Pankti Mehta, Olena Zimba, Armen Yuri Gasparyan, Birzhan Seiil, Marlen Yessirkepov
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Analysis of duplicated publications in Russian journals
Yury V. Chekhovich, Andrey V. Khazov
Journal of Informetrics.2022; 16(1): 101246. CrossRef
Consultation questions on publication ethics from 2016 to 2020 addressed by the Committee on Publication Ethics of the Korean Council of Science Editors
Woo Jin Son, Cheol-Heui Yun
Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 112. CrossRef

Essays

Coaching early-career social sciences researchers to publish their first indexed publications: the Research Coach in Social Sciences program as a model: Hiep-Hung Pham; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):189-193. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.216

7,839 View
123 Download
2 Crossref

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Congratulations on Child Health Nursing Research becoming a PubMed Central journal and reflections on its significance
Sun Huh
Child Health Nursing Research.2022; 28(1): 1. CrossRef
Cultivating Social Science Research in Vietnam: A Case of Collaboration between a Private Research Institute with International and Domestic Research Entities
Hiep-Hung Pham, Anh-Duc Hoang
SSRN Electronic Journal .2020;[Epub] CrossRef

Ultrasonography : road to SCIE listing: Jeong-Sik Yu; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):194-197. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.217

4,298 View
93 Download

PDF

First
Prev
Page of 2
Next
Last

Previous issues