Science Editing

Training Material

The research nexus and Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI): sharing our goal of an open, connected ecosystem of research objects: Rachael Lammey; Sci Ed. 2023;10(2):190-194. Published online July 31, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.315

2,071 View
212 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

As a community, it is impossible to ignore the fact that sharing research and information related to research is a much broader proposition than sharing an article, book, or conference paper. In supporting an evolving scholarly record, making connections between research organizations, contributors, actions, and objects helps give a more complete picture of the scholarly record, which open infrastructure organizations like Crossref call the research nexus. Crossref is working to support this evolution and is thinking about the metadata it collects via its members and that it supplements and curates, to make it broader than the rigid structures traditionally provided by content types. Furthermore, because of Crossref’s commitment to the Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI), this network of information will be global and openly available for anyone in the community to access and reuse. The present article describes this vision in more detail, including why it is increasingly important to support the links between research and elements that contribute or are related to that research; how Crossref, its members, and the wider community can support it; and the work and planning Crossref is doing to make it easier to achieve this.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions received the top-ranking Journal Impact Factor―9.3—in the category of Education, Scientific Disciplines in the 2023 Journal Citation Ranking by Clarivate
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2024; 21: 16. CrossRef

Original Article

How open access diamond journals comply with industry standards exemplified by Plan S technical requirements: Korean Council of Science Editors; Sci Ed. 2023;10(1):35-44. Published online February 16, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.295

5,027 View
274 Download
1 Web of Science

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Purpose
This study investigated how well current open access (OA) diamond journals in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and a survey conform to Plan S requirements, including licenses, peer review, author copyright, unique article identifiers, digital archiving, and machine-readable licenses.
Methods
Data obtained from DOAJ journals and surveyed journals from mid-June to mid-July 2020 were analyzed for a variety of Plan S requirements. The results were presented using descriptive statistics.
Results
Out of 1,465 journals that answered, 1,137 (77.0%) reported compliance with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) principles. The peer review types used by OA diamond journals were double-blind (6,339), blind (2,070), peer review (not otherwise specified, 1,879), open peer review (42), and editorial review (118) out of 10,449 DOAJ journals. An author copyright retention policy was adopted by 5,090 out of 10,448 OA diamond journals (48.7%) in DOAJ. Of the unique article identifiers, 5,702 (54.6%) were digital object identifiers, 58 (0.6%) were handles, and 14 (0.1%) were uniform resource names, while 4,675 (44.7%) used none. Out of 1,619 surveyed journals, the archiving solutions were national libraries (n=170, 10.5%), Portico (n=67, 4.1%), PubMed Central (n=15, 0.9%), PKP PN (n=91, 5.6%), LOCKSS (n=136, 8.4%), CLOCKSS (n=87, 5.4%), the National Computing Center for Higher Education (n=6, 0.3%), others (n=69, 4.3%), no policy (n=855, 52.8%), and no reply (n=123, 7.6%). Article-level metadata deposition was done by 8,145 out of 10,449 OA diamond journals (78.0%) in DOAJ.
Conclusion
OA diamond journals’ compliance with industry standards exemplified by the Plan S technical requirements was insufficient, except for the peer review type.

Training Material

Participation Reports help Crossref members drive research further: Anna Tolwinska; Sci Ed. 2021;8(2):180-185. Published online August 20, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.253

4,580 View
108 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Abstract PDF

This article aims to explain the key metadata elements listed in Participation Reports, why it’s important to check them regularly, and how Crossref members can improve their scores. Crossref members register a lot of metadata in Crossref. That metadata is machine-readable, standardized, and then shared across discovery services and author tools. This is important because richer metadata makes content more discoverable and useful to the scholarly community. It’s not always easy to know what metadata Crossref members register in Crossref. This is why Crossref created an easy-to-use tool called Participation Reports to show editors, and researchers the key metadata elements Crossref members register to make their content more useful. The key metadata elements include references and whether they are set to open, ORCID iDs, funding information, Crossmark metadata, licenses, full-text URLs for text-mining, and Similarity Check indexing, as well as abstracts. ROR IDs (Research Organization Registry Identifiers), that identify institutions will be added in the future. This data was always available through the Crossref ’s REST API (Representational State Transfer Application Programming Interface) but is now visualized in Participation Reports. To improve scores, editors should encourage authors to submit ORCIDs in their manuscripts and publishers should register as much metadata as possible to help drive research further.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
Jae Hwa Chang
Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69. CrossRef

Original Article

Crossref at 20 years: what do the community need?: Rachael Lammey; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):125-129. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.206

5,206 View
87 Download
5 Web of Science
6 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
The 20th anniversary of Crossref is a good point to evaluate where Crossref stands with the communities it supports so that it can be in a position to serve their needs in the future.
Methods
This evaluation took the form of a survey and a series of interviews run by Shift Learning in mid-2019.
Results
Results are presented in the form of a report authored by Shift Learning which is discussed in this paper.
Conclusion
Overall, Crossref is appreciated and provides value for the scholarly community. However, it needs to make sure that it continues to serve key stakeholders, ensure that core systems work smoothly for all members and that they balance the needs of its different sizes of members and those who subscribe to or use the Crossref metadata. The report from Shift Learning makes specific recommendations regarding pricing, products and services and, communications which Crossref should consider to continue to address the needs of its diverse stakeholders

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A new method of calculating the disruption index based on open citation data
Yuyan Jiang, Xueli Liu
Journal of Information Science.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
Jae Hwa Chang
Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69. CrossRef
Presidential address: the Korean Council of Science Editors as a board member of Crossref from March 2021 to February 2024
Sun Huh
Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 1. CrossRef
Instructions for Authors Submitting Papers to Electrochemistry

Electrochemistry.2021; 89(Announceme): S20. CrossRef
Instructions for Authors Submitting Papers to Electrochemistry

Electrochemistry.2021; 89(Announceme): S1. CrossRef
Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377. CrossRef

Training Materials

Using the Crossref Metadata API to explore publisher content: Rachael Lammey; Sci Ed. 2016;3(2):109-111. Published online August 20, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.75

14,448 View
208 Download
9 Web of Science
9 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Crossref is a not-for-profit membership association for scholarly publishers, founded in 2000. It is the largest digital object identifier (DOI) registration agency and provides publisher members with the capacity to deposit DOIs and their associated metadata to support persistent linking between different types of academic content. In a previous paper in Science Editing [1], Crossref mentioned a newly-created interface (http://search.crossref.org) that allowed publishers, libraries and researchers to search across nearly 50 million Crossref metadata records for items such as journal articles, books and conference proceedings. Since that paper was published, the search service has graduated into a live production service covering over 81 million DOIs, and Crossref has documented and made available the application programming interface used to build and support the search interface. This paper will provide information on this Crossref Metadata API, which is being widely adopted and used by many different stakeholders in the scholarly community, and give examples of how it is being employed by these parties.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A systematic literature review on STEAM pre- and in-service teacher education for sustainability: Are teachers ready?
Jonathan Álvarez Ariza, Tope Gloria Olatunde-Aiyedun
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.2024; 20(9): em2498. CrossRef
A new method of calculating the disruption index based on open citation data
Yuyan Jiang, Xueli Liu
Journal of Information Science.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Citation needed? Wikipedia bibliometrics during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic
Omer Benjakob, Rona Aviram, Jonathan Aryeh Sobel
GigaScience.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
Jae Hwa Chang
Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69. CrossRef
Low-Cost Assistive Technologies for Disabled People Using Open-Source Hardware and Software: A Systematic Literature Review
Jonathan Alvarez Ariza, Joshua M. Pearce
IEEE Access.2022; 10: 124894. CrossRef
Understanding the role of single‐board computers in engineering and computer science education: A systematic literature review
Jonathan Á. Ariza, Heyson Baez
Computer Applications in Engineering Education.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377. CrossRef
Biomedical text mining for research rigor and integrity: tasks, challenges, directions
Halil Kilicoglu
Briefings in Bioinformatics.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
How to Deal with Ethical Issues Involving Animal Experiments and Identifiable Photographs in Articles Published in Archives of Plastic Surgery
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2017; 44(06): 475. CrossRef

CrossRef tools for small publishers: Rachael Lammey; Sci Ed. 2015;2(2):79-85. Published online August 14, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.48

20,411 View
133 Download
1 Web of Science
8 Crossref

Abstract PDF

CrossRef is a membership association for scholarly publishers with a mission of improving scholarly communication through community collaboration. CrossRef now has over 5,000 publisher members, and a large proportion of these member publishers (over 80%) are small, international publishers. As such, CrossRef needs to put tools in place to help these smaller publishers fulfil the basic technical requirements of CrossRef membership and participate in optional CrossRef services—CrossCheck and CrossMark among others. This article will describe some of CrossRef ’s upcoming and recently launched tools for small publishers, detail how they work, and will let members know where they can find and make use of these applications. It will focus predominantly on the CrossRef linking console, the additions to the web deposit form and the CSV (comma separated value) upload improvements that have recently been released or are scheduled for release in the near future.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Ethical consideration of the use of generative artificial intelligence, including ChatGPT in writing a nursing article
Sun Huh
Child Health Nursing Research.2023; 29(4): 249. CrossRef
Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
Jae Hwa Chang
Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69. CrossRef
Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
Sun Huh
Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238. CrossRef
Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
Sun Huh
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137. CrossRef
How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
Sun Huh
Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95. CrossRef
Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
Sun Huh
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524. CrossRef
How to Deal with Ethical Issues Involving Animal Experiments and Identifiable Photographs in Articles Published in Archives of Plastic Surgery
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2017; 44(06): 475. CrossRef
How to successfully list a journal in the Social Science Citation Index or Science Citation Index Expanded
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Medical Education.2017; 29(4): 221. CrossRef

CrossRef text and data mining services: Rachael Lammey; Sci Ed. 2015;2(1):22-27. Published online February 28, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.32

21,936 View
208 Download
28 Web of Science
26 Crossref

Abstract PDF

CrossRef is an association of scholarly publishers that develops shared infrastructure to support more effective scholarly communications. It is a registration agency for the digital object identifier (DOI), and has built additional services for CrossRef members around the DOI and the bibliographic metadata that publishers deposit in order to register DOIs for their publications. Among these services are CrossCheck, powered by iThenticate, which helps publishers screen for plagiarism in submitted manuscripts and FundRef, which gives publishers standard way to report funding sources for published scholarly research. To add to these services, Cross-Ref launched CrossRef text and data mining services in May 2014. This article will explain the thinking behind CrossRef launching this new service, what it offers to publishers and researchers alike, how publishers can participate in it, and the uptake of the service so far.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Hidden limitations of analyses via alternative bibliometric services
Libor Ansorge
Scientometrics.2023; 128(3): 2031. CrossRef
Tera-hertz (THz) catalysis on MXene for enhanced selectivity from CO2 to CO
Ziao Wang, Yao Xu, Tao Feng, Chaojun Lei, Yu Zhao, Xi Zhu
Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers.2023; 10(10): 2903. CrossRef
Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing Enable a Data-Oriented Experimental Design Approach for Producing Biochar and Hydrochar from Biomass
Amauri J. Paula, Odair Pastor Ferreira, Antonio G. Souza Filho, Francisco Nepomuceno Filho, Carlos E. Andrade, Andreia F. Faria
Chemistry of Materials.2022; 34(3): 979. CrossRef
CRIS Systems in Research Organization Administrating
Boris Alperin, Inna Zibareva, Aleksey Vedyagin
Science Management: Theory and Practice.2022; 4(1): 143. CrossRef
Machine learning for knowledge transfer across multiple metals additive manufacturing printers
Sen Liu, Aaron P. Stebner, Branden B. Kappes, Xiaoli Zhang
Additive Manufacturing.2021; 39: 101877. CrossRef
Knowledge Graphs for COVID-19: An Exploratory Review of the Current Landscape
Avishek Chatterjee, Cosimo Nardi, Cary Oberije, Philippe Lambin
Journal of Personalized Medicine.2021; 11(4): 300. CrossRef
Data-Driven Prediction of Minimum Fluidization Velocity in Gas-Fluidized Beds Using Data Extracted by Text Mining
Jibin Zhou, Duiping Liu, Mao Ye, Zhongmin Liu
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.2021; 60(37): 13727. CrossRef
Artificial intelligence for ocean science data integration: current state, gaps, and way forward
Tomer Sagi, Yoav Lehahn, Koby Bar, Jody W. Deming, Lisa A. Miller
Elem Sci Anth.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Citation.js: a format-independent, modular bibliography tool for the browser and command line
Lars G. Willighagen
PeerJ Computer Science.2019; 5: e214. CrossRef
Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
Sun Huh
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137. CrossRef
How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
Sun Huh
Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95. CrossRef
Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
Sun Huh
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524. CrossRef
The rapid internationalization of Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism as evidenced by journal metrics
Sun Huh
Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism.2017; 22(2): 77. CrossRef
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research's promotion to internationally competitive journal evidenced by journal metrics
Sun Huh
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research.2017; 6(2): 67. CrossRef
Machine-learned and codified synthesis parameters of oxide materials
Edward Kim, Kevin Huang, Alex Tomala, Sara Matthews, Emma Strubell, Adam Saunders, Andrew McCallum, Elsa Olivetti
Scientific Data.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
How to Deal with Ethical Issues Involving Animal Experiments and Identifiable Photographs in Articles Published in Archives of Plastic Surgery
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2017; 44(06): 475. CrossRef
Promotion ofNeurointerventionto International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
Sun Huh
Neurointervention.2016; 11(1): 5. CrossRef
Journal of Gastric Cancer's Promotion to International Journal from the Perspective of Biliometric Analysis
Sun Huh
Journal of Gastric Cancer.2016; 16(1): 8. CrossRef
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery's Evolution into an International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
Sun Huh
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2016; 8(2): 127. CrossRef
How to Promote the Korean Journal of Child Studies to an International Journal
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Child Studies.2016; 37(1): 7. CrossRef
Status of digital standards in Korean medical journals in 2016
Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
Science Editing.2016; 3(2): 100. CrossRef
How much progress has been made in journal metrics two years after the citation analysis of theKorean Journal of Urology?
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Urology.2015; 56(4): 276. CrossRef
Evidence of the Internationalization ofClinical EndoscopyBased on Journal Metrics
Sun Huh
Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(4): 317. CrossRef
The Elevation ofAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicineto the Status of an International Journal After Adopting an English-Only Policy
Sun Huh
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2015; 39(5): 661. CrossRef
How much is Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions promoted based on journal metrics?
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2015; 12: 57. CrossRef
What is the position ofClinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicinein its scholarly journal network based on journal metrics?
Sun Huh
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine.2014; 41(4): 147. CrossRef

How to apply CrossMark and FundRef via CrossRef extensible markup language: Rachael Lammey; Sci Ed. 2014;1(2):84-90. Published online August 18, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.84

22,198 View
153 Download
1 Web of Science
17 Crossref

Abstract PDF

CrossRef is an association of scholarly publishers that develops shared infrastructure to support more effective scholarly communications. In the 14 years since CrossRef launched, it has developed a number of services that hinge around the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) and the publication metadata submitted to CrossRef by publishers registering DOIs. CrossMark and FundRef are two additional services from CrossRef that publishers can choose to participate in, and both require publishers to provide additional information with the bibliographic metadata provided within their CrossRef deposits. This article will aim to show what this additional metadata is, how it should be formatted and why, so that publishers can use it to enhance their content and participate in additional CrossRef services that benefit the scholarly communications industry.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
Jae Hwa Chang
Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69. CrossRef
Open Science Indicators as Metadata Fields?
Chris Fradkin, Rogério Mugnaini
Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
Sun Huh
Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238. CrossRef
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions will be accepted for inclusion in Scopus
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 2. CrossRef
Is it possible to foster first-rate publishers through a journal publishing cooperative in Korea?
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(01): 3. CrossRef
How many retracted articles indexed in KoreaMed were cited 1 year after retraction notification
Soo Young Kim, Hyun Jung Yi, Hye-Min Cho, Sun Huh
Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 122. CrossRef
Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
Sun Huh
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137. CrossRef
How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
Sun Huh
Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95. CrossRef
Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
Sun Huh
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524. CrossRef
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research's promotion to internationally competitive journal evidenced by journal metrics
Sun Huh
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research.2017; 6(2): 67. CrossRef
How to Deal with Ethical Issues Involving Animal Experiments and Identifiable Photographs in Articles Published in Archives of Plastic Surgery
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2017; 44(06): 475. CrossRef
Perpetuation of Retracted Publications Using the Example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, Reasons and Possible Improvements
Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti, Istvan S. Szilagyi, Andreas Sandner-Kiesling
Science and Engineering Ethics.2016; 22(4): 1063. CrossRef
How to Promote the Korean Journal of Child Studies to an International Journal
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Child Studies.2016; 37(1): 7. CrossRef
Characteristics of Retractions from Korean Medical Journals in the KoreaMed Database: A Bibliometric Analysis
Sun Huh, Soo Young Kim, Hye-Min Cho, Xu-jie Zhou
PLOS ONE.2016; 11(10): e0163588. CrossRef
How much is Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions promoted based on journal metrics?
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2015; 12: 57. CrossRef
Journal’s step to leap to the international level and communication skill
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Medical Education.2014; 26(3): 159. CrossRef
How Journal Metrics Illustrate the Transformation of Archives of Plastic Surgery into an International Journal
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2014; 41(06): 617. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search