KCSE
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
Original Article
- A bibliometric analysis of articles on innovation systems in Scopus journals written by authors from Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia
- Prakoso Bhairawa Putera, Suryanto Suryanto, Sinta Ningrum, Ida Widianingsih
- Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):177-183. Published online August 20, 2020
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.214
- 6,230 View
- 194 Download
- 5 Web of Science
- 9 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
Supplementary Material - Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the bibliometric characteristics of articles on innovation systems published in Scopus-indexed journals by authors with Indonesian affiliations from 1998 to 2019, in comparison with those published by authors from Singapore and Malaysia.
Methods
We conducted a bibliometric and content analysis of publications in the Scopus database. A total of 138 articles from Indonesia, 209 articles from Singapore, and 309 articles from Malaysia were analyzed. They were classified by publication year, authors, co-authors’ country, affiliation, keywords, and journal title.
Results
Authors with affiliations from Malaysia were more productive than authors from Singapore and Indonesia during 1998 to 2019. In terms of the quality of papers, Singapore had more productive authors than Malaysia and Indonesia based on the citation frequency.
Conclusion
Although fewer articles on innovation systems were published by authors from Indonesia than by those from Malaysia and Singapore, the recent increase in the number of publications by Indonesian authors suggests that number of articles from Indonesia will soon surpass those from the other two countries. International collaboration will help accelerate the number of publications. -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Global discourse of restorative justice studies: an analysis of three decade bibliometric analysis (1993-2022)
Amelya Gustina, Tatik Sunatri, Maurice Rogers, Aghia Khumaesi Suud, Jajang Aminullah Alwahdy
Contemporary Justice Review.2024; : 1. CrossRef - The typology and determinant of performance measurement for public sector organizations – a literature review
Doris Febriyanti, Ida Widianingsih, Asep Sumaryana, Rd. Ahmad Buchari
Cogent Business & Management.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Big data security & individual (psychological) resilience: A review of social media risks and lessons learned from Indonesia
Abdillah Abdillah, Ida Widianingsih, Rd Ahmad Buchari, Heru Nurasa
Array.2024; 21: 100336. CrossRef - Three decades research in the field of business ecosystem
Ahmad Rifa’i, Sam’un Jaja Raharja, Rivani Rivani, Ratih Purbasari
Cogent Business & Management.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Three Decades of Discourse on Science, Technology and Innovation in National Innovation System: A Bibliometric Analysis (1990 – 2020)
Prakoso Bhairawa Putera, Suryanto Suryanto, Sinta Ningrum, Ida Widianingsih, Yan Rianto
Cogent Social Sciences.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Bibliometric Analysis of the Utilisation of FINDRISC in Patients with Diabetes: 2005-2021
M. Rifqi Rokhman, Bustanul Arifin, Zulkarnain Zulkarnain, Saidah Rauf, Dyah Aryani Perwitasari
Borneo Journal of Pharmacy.2022; 5(3): 288. CrossRef - Bibliometric Analysis Of Fisheries Policy Articles In The Journal Scopus Written By Authors From Affiliates Of The 10 Best Universities In Indonesia
Eki Darmawan, Ida Widianingsih, Rahman Mulyawan, Mudiyati Rahmatunnisa
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.2022; 1095(1): 012014. CrossRef - Indonesia’s Place in the Research Landscape of Southeast Asia
Dalibor Fiala
Unisia.2022; : 45. CrossRef - Evolutionary Study of Watershed Governance Research: A Bibliometric Analysis
Ida Widianingsih, Caroline Paskarina, Riswanda Riswanda, Prakoso Bhairawa Putera
Science & Technology Libraries.2021; 40(4): 416. CrossRef
- Global discourse of restorative justice studies: an analysis of three decade bibliometric analysis (1993-2022)
Review
- The big picture: scholarly publishing trends 2014
- Pippa Smart
- Sci Ed. 2014;1(2):52-57. Published online August 18, 2014
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.52
- 31,828 View
- 193 Download
- 11 Web of Science
- 9 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
It is important for journal editors to keep up to date with the changes happening in the international journal environment to ensure that their own publications remain current and meet international expectations. Dramatic changes have taken place in the journals environment during the last two decades, frequently driven by technology but also by increased global participation in scholarly and scientific research and concern about the commercial influence on dissemination of knowledge. Technical solutions have attempted to address the growth in research but have sometimes added to the tsunami of information and increased the need to manage quality. To this end experiments with the traditional quality control and dissemination systems have been attempted, but news of improvements are frequently overshadowed by alarms about ethical problems. There is particular concern about some of the new publishers who are not adhering to established quality control and ethical practices. Within a potentially fragmenting system, however, there are also emerging collaborative projects helping to knit together the different elements of the publishing landscape to improve quality, linkages and access.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Global trend of clinical biomarkers of health and disease during the period (1913–2021): systematic review and bibliometric analysis
Snezana M. Jovicic
African Journal of Urology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Predatory publishing through McCornarck’s information manipulation theory
Harry Kipkemoi Bett
Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.2020; 69(4/5): 331. CrossRef - Forecast of the Development of Russian Scientific Journals: The Publishers
O. V. Moskaleva, M. A. Akoev
Scholarly Research and Information.2020; 3(2-3): 131. CrossRef - English language policies in scientific journals: Signs of change in the field of economics
Ann C. Henshall
Journal of English for Academic Purposes.2018; 36: 26. CrossRef - How open access is crucial to the future of science: A reply
H. Charles Romesburg
The Journal of Wildlife Management.2017; 81(4): 567. CrossRef - Supply chain management 1982–2015: a review
Nasrin Asgari, Ehsan Nikbakhsh, Alex Hill, Reza Zanjirani Farahani
IMA Journal of Management Mathematics.2016; 27(3): 353. CrossRef - Topics of major current interest in scholarly editing and publishing based on the content analysis of selected journals
Yeonok Chung
Science Editing.2015; 2(2): 59. CrossRef - How Green Is This Paper?
Toby Miller
Culture Unbound.2015; 7(4): 588. CrossRef - What is the position ofClinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicinein its scholarly journal network based on journal metrics?
Sun Huh
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine.2014; 41(4): 147. CrossRef
- Global trend of clinical biomarkers of health and disease during the period (1913–2021): systematic review and bibliometric analysis
First
Prev
