Analysis of Korean journals rejected by Scopus since 2011
Science Editing. 2020;7(1):50-54 
Citation Analysis ofThe Korean Journal of Internal Medicinefrom KoMCI, Web of Science, and Scopus
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine. 2011;26(1):1
Comparison between Korean and foreign authors concerning the citation impact of Korean journals indexed in Scopus
Science Editing. 2018;6(1):47-57
An analysis of discontinued journals by Scopus
Scientometrics. 2018;116(3):1805-1815
Citation Analysis of theKorean Journal of UrologyFrom Web of Science, Scopus, Korean Medical Citation Index, KoreaMed Synapse, and Google Scholar
Korean Journal of Urology. 2013;54(4):220
The Publication Success of 102 Nations in Scopus and the Performance of Their Scopus-Indexed Journals
Publishing Research Quarterly. 2017;33(4):421-432
Journals removed from DOAJ appearing within SCImago's ranks: A study of excluded journals
Learned Publishing. 2018;32(3):207-211
The new Scopus CiteScore formula and the Journal Impact Factor: a look at top ranking journals and middle ranking journals in the Scopus categories of General Physics and Astronomy, Materials Science, General Medicine and Social Sciences
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine. 2020;43(3):739-748
When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2015;67(1):191-199
A bibliometric analysis of pharmacology and pharmacy journals: Scopus versus Web of Science
Journal of Information Science. 2008;34(5):715-725