![]() |
Peer review at the beginning of the 21st century
Irene Hames
Sci Ed. 2014;1(1):4-8. Published online 2014 Feb 13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.4
|
Citations to this article as recorded by
The challenge of recruiting peer reviewers from one medical journal’s perspective
Christopher J. Peterson, Cynthia Orticio, Kenneth Nugent
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings.2022; 35(3): 394. CrossRef Effective Peer Review: Who, Where, or What?
Russell P. Hall
JID Innovations.2022; 2(6): 100162. CrossRef JID Innovations and Peer Review
Russell P. Hall
JID Innovations.2021; 1(3): 100056. CrossRef Enhancing reproducibility: Failures from Reproducibility Initiatives underline core challenges
Kevin Mullane, Michael Williams
Biochemical Pharmacology.2017; 138: 7. CrossRef Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers
Tony Ross-Hellauer, Arvid Deppe, Birgit Schmidt, Jelte M. Wicherts
PLOS ONE.2017; 12(12): e0189311. CrossRef Editing and publishing scholarly journals in the internet age
Kihong Kim
Science Editing.2014; 1(1): 2. CrossRef The big picture: scholarly publishing trends 2014
Pippa Smart
Science Editing.2014; 1(2): 52. CrossRef
|