Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Science Editing : Science Editing

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
8 "Scholarly publishing"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Review
Artificial intelligence-assisted tools for redefining the communication landscape of the scholarly world
Habeeb Ibrahim Abdul Razack, Sam T. Mathew, Fathinul Fikri Ahmad Saad, Saleh A. Alqahtani
Sci Ed. 2021;8(2):134-144.   Published online July 27, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.244
  • 18,993 View
  • 681 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
The flood of research output and increasing demands for peer reviewers have necessitated the intervention of artificial intelligence (AI) in scholarly publishing. Although human input is seen as essential for writing publications, the contribution of AI slowly and steadily moves ahead. AI may redefine the role of science communication experts in the future and transform the scholarly publishing industry into a technology-driven one. It can prospectively improve the quality of publishable content and identify errors in published content. In this article, we review various AI and other associated tools currently in use or development for a range of publishing obligations and functions that have brought about or can soon leverage much-demanded advances in scholarly communications. Several AI-assisted tools, with diverse scope and scale, have emerged in the scholarly market. AI algorithms develop summaries of scientific publications and convert them into plain-language texts, press statements, and news stories. Retrieval of accurate and sufficient information is prominent in evidence-based science publications. Semantic tools may empower transparent and proficient data extraction tactics. From detecting simple plagiarism errors to predicting the projected citation impact of an unpublished article, AI’s role in scholarly publishing is expected to be multidimensional. AI, natural language processing, and machine learning in scholarly publishing have arrived for writers, editors, authors, and publishers. They should leverage these technologies to enable the fast and accurate dissemination of scientific information to contribute to the betterment of humankind.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Slow Writing with ChatGPT: Turning the Hype into a Right Way Forward
    Chitnarong Sirisathitkul
    Postdigital Science and Education.2024; 6(2): 431.     CrossRef
  • Navigating the impact: a study of editors’ and proofreaders’ perceptions of AI tools in editing and proofreading
    Islam Al Sawi, Ahmed Alaa
    Discover Artificial Intelligence.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Beyond Plagiarism: ChatGPT as the Vanguard of Technological Revolution in Research and Citation
    Hanni B. Flaherty, Jackson Yurch
    Research on Social Work Practice.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Capítulo 3. Inteligencia Artificial en la comunicación científica
    Sofía E. Calle-Pesántez, José Moisés Pallo-Chiguano
    Espejo de Monografías de Comunicación Social.2024; (23): 59.     CrossRef
  • MAATrica: a Measure for Assessing Consistency and Methods in Medicinal and Nutraceutical Chemistry Papers
    Giulia Panzarella, Alessandro Gallo, Sandra Coecke, Maddalena Querci, Francesco Ortuso, Martin Hofmann-Apitius, Pierangelo Veltri, Jürgen Bajorath, Stefano Alcaro
    European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.2024; : 116522.     CrossRef
  • Recent Issues in Medical Journal Publishing and Editing Policies: Adoption of Artificial Intelligence, Preprints, Open Peer Review, Model Text Recycling Policies, Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing 4th Version, and Country Names in Titles
    Sun Huh
    Neurointervention.2023; 18(1): 2.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence-assisted medical writing: With greater power comes greater responsibility
    Rhythm Bains
    Asian Journal of Oral Health and Allied Sciences.2023; 13: 2.     CrossRef
  • Emergence of the metaverse and ChatGPT in journal publishing after the COVID-19 pandemic
    Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2023; 10(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Author-Profile-Based Journal Recommendation for a Candidate Article: Using Hybrid Semantic Similarity and Trend Analysis
    Mehmet Yașar Bayraktar, Mehmet Kaya
    IEEE Access.2023; 11: 45826.     CrossRef
  • Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?
    Santi Pratiwi Tri Utami, Andayani Andayani, Retno Winarni, Sumarwati Sumarwati
    Contemporary Educational Technology.2023; 15(4): ep450.     CrossRef
  • The impact of generative AI tools on researchers and research: Implications for academia in higher education
    Abdulrahman M. Al-Zahrani
    Innovations in Education and Teaching International.2023; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Editorial policies on the use of generative artificial intelligence in article writing and peer-review in the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 40.     CrossRef
  • Current Status of Neurointervention, the Official Journal of the Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology
    Dae Chul Suh, Sun Huh
    Neurointervention.2022; 17(2): 67.     CrossRef
  • Profiles of Technology Use and Plagiarism in High School Education
    Juan Carlos Torres-Diaz, Pablo Vicente Torres Carrión, Isidro Marín Gutierrez
    SSRN Electronic Journal .2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
Original Articles
Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in Korean academic society-published journals listed in Journal Citation Reports
Ye Jin Choi, Hyung Wook Choi, Soon Kim
Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):24-33.   Published online February 20, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.186
  • 6,099 View
  • 133 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose: The “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” are of increasing importance in an open science environment as a way to increase the transparency and quality of academic society journals. However, little previous research has investigated the application of this new guideline in practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree to which this guideline is being applied by Korean academic society– published journals listed in Journal Citation Reports.
Methods
The researchers investigated the homepages of 59 Korean academic society– published journals to evaluate whether they had adopted the 33 items listed in the guideline. Based on the information available on the journals’ homepages, each item was classified as ‘yes’ or ‘no’ within the four categories of basic journal information, publication ethics, copyright and archiving information, and profit model.
Results
The basic journal information category was generally well-practiced, with the exceptions of the peer review process, readership, and author fees. The copyright and licensing information category was also well-practiced, with the exception of policies on posting accepted articles with third parties and archiving items. However, most items in the publication ethics category were not well practiced, with the exception of authorship and intellectual property. All items in the profit model category were infrequently implemented.
Conclusion
These findings serve as a good indicator for Korean journal editors of areas for improvement. It may be helpful to review journals’ publication policies and homepages to comply with international publishing standards.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Application of Open Science Potentials in Research Processes: A Comprehensive Literature Review
    Maryam Zarghani, Leila Nemati-Anaraki, Shahram Sedghi, Abdolreza Noroozi Chakoli, Anisa Rowhani-Farid
    Libri.2023; 73(2): 167.     CrossRef
  • Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321.     CrossRef
  • Congratulations on Child Health Nursing Research becoming a PubMed Central journal and reflections on its significance
    Sun Huh
    Child Health Nursing Research.2022; 28(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Marking the inclusion of the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing in PubMed Central and strategies to be promoted to a top-tier journal in the nursing category
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing.2022; 28(3): 165.     CrossRef
  • Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641.     CrossRef
  • The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20.     CrossRef
  • How Annals of Dermatology Has Improved the Scientific Quality and Ethical Standards of its Articles in the Two-Year Period since October 2018
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Dermatology.2020; 32(5): 353.     CrossRef
Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in academic society published journals
Hyung Wook Choi, Ye Jin Choi, Soon Kim
Sci Ed. 2019;6(2):112-121.   Published online August 19, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.171
  • 6,368 View
  • 126 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 13 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose: Four international associations, including the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, the Directory of Open Access Journals, the Committee on Publication Ethics, and the World Association of Medical Editors declared the third version of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” to ensure transparency and quality in journal publications. This study is aimed at assessing the guidelines from the journals’ websites manually.
Methods
In this study, three researchers investigate the homepages of 781 academic society-published journals that are registered in the Science Citation Index Expanded and whether these journals are effectively adopting these new guidelines. In this paper, 33 items from the guidelines are examined. The 33 items are rearranged into four different categories: basic journal information; publication ethics; copyright and archiving information; and profit model. The researchers count yes or no after checking the adopting status on the journal homepage and dividing into four scales: 0% to 25% for is rarely practiced, 26% to 50% for is poorly practiced, 51% to 75% for is adequately practiced, and 76% to 100% for is well practiced.
Results
Of the 33 items, 10 are found to be poorly or rarely practiced, including readership, data sharing, archiving policies, and profit model information.
Conclusion
It could be the most up-to-date indicator of the current status of applying best practice guidelines. Society journal editors especially from Asia should evaluate their journals regarding “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing”.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Opening up to the open data
    Prakash K. Dubey
    Journal of Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences.2024; 10(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Prestige of scholarly book publishers—An investigation into criteria, processes, and practices across countries
    Eleonora Dagienė
    Research Evaluation.2023; 32(2): 356.     CrossRef
  • The use of data repositories in dermatology
    Umer Nadir, Loma Dave, Michael D. Yi, Farhana Ikmal Hisham, Murad Alam
    Archives of Dermatological Research.2023; 315(6): 1851.     CrossRef
  • Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321.     CrossRef
  • Cumplimiento de Estándares Internacionales en Publicaciones Arbitradas Académicas Mexicanas y Guatemaltecas
    Humberto Emilio Aguilera Arévalo
    Revista Académica Sociedad del Conocimiento Cunzac.2022; 2(1): 89.     CrossRef
  • Open Data Policies among Library and Information Science Journals
    Brian Jackson
    Publications.2021; 9(2): 25.     CrossRef
  • Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641.     CrossRef
  • The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20.     CrossRef
  • Changes in bibliographic information associated with Korean scientific journals from 2011 to 2019
    Yoon Joo Seo, Hye-Min Cho, Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 11.     CrossRef
  • Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in Korean academic society-published journals listed in Journal Citation Reports
    Ye Jin Choi, Hyung Wook Choi, Soon Kim
    Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
    Sun Huh
    Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238.     CrossRef
  • How Annals of Dermatology Has Improved the Scientific Quality and Ethical Standards of its Articles in the Two-Year Period since October 2018
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Dermatology.2020; 32(5): 353.     CrossRef
  • Recent trends in medical journals’ data sharing policies and statements of data availability
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(06): 493.     CrossRef
Comparative analysis of manuscript management systems for scholarly publishing
Soon Kim, Hyungwook Choi, Nayon Kim, EunKyung Chung, Jae Yun Lee
Sci Ed. 2018;5(2):124-134.   Published online August 20, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.137
  • 20,712 View
  • 359 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
To improve scholarly communications with scientists throughout the world, an international-level manuscript management system is indispensable. We analyzed the manuscript management systems currently in use in Korea and suggested ways to improve these domestic systems through benchmarking with representative overseas systems. Drawing information from the manufacturer’s documentation, we compared the functionalities of the major manuscript management systems available in Korea to international systems. Based on this analysis, we identified the essential elements necessary to meet international standards. The representative international systems provide an intuitive interface and an efficient communication channel for authors, editors, and reviewers, enabling them to save time. The two domestic paid systems are almost at the international level; however, the free systems developed in Korea need to be upgraded. In particular, more advanced visualization tools, more efficient tools for communication between stakeholders, and convenient linking to external content are needed. Studies of these manuscript management systems, which are essential for the internationalization of domestic journals, can be utilized as primary materials to improve the level of Korean academic journals in response to the rapid changes in modern scholarly communication.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review
    Kayvan Kousha, Mike Thelwall
    Learned Publishing.2024; 37(1): 4.     CrossRef
  • Should publishers use online submission systems to harvest authors’ responses to diversity, equity and inclusion?
    J. A. Teixeira da Silva
    Science Editor and Publisher.2023; 7(2): 210.     CrossRef
  • An Exploratory Study into Professional Scholarly Journals Publishing Software Adoption in Lithuania
    Vincas Grigas, Arūnas Gudinavičius, Tomas Petreikis, Andrius Šuminas
    Information & Media.2023; 96: 179.     CrossRef
  • A Blockchain-Based Editorial Management System
    Eman-Yaser Daraghmi, Mamoun Abu Helou, Yousef-Awwad Daraghmi, omar cheikhrouhou
    Security and Communication Networks.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence-assisted tools for redefining the communication landscape of the scholarly world
    Habeeb Ibrahim Abdul Razack, Sam T. Mathew, Fathinul Fikri Ahmad Saad, Saleh A. Alqahtani
    Science Editing.2021; 8(2): 134.     CrossRef
  • The “invisible hand” of peer review: The implications of author-referee networks on peer review in a scholarly journal
    Pierpaolo Dondio, Niccolò Casnici, Francisco Grimaldo, Nigel Gilbert, Flaminio Squazzoni
    Journal of Informetrics.2019; 13(2): 708.     CrossRef
Review
Latest trends in innovative global scholarly journal publication and distribution platforms
Soon Kim, Eunkyung Chung, Jae Yun Lee
Sci Ed. 2018;5(2):100-112.   Published online August 20, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.133
  • 16,505 View
  • 235 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
This review article presents the latest trends in innovative global scholarly journal publication and distribution platforms, with implications for local journals. Changes have taken place in distribution policies, as pre-publication distribution has become a viable option, and for post-publication distribution, public access or mandatory open access policies have been introduced for articles supported by public or governmental funds. New formats of articles include graphical abstracts, interactive PDFs, the application of semantic enhancements, and the utilization of research data, social networking sites, such as Mendeley and ResearchGate, have become common sites for information exchange. Altmetrics have been adopted to complement traditional journal metrics. PubMed Central, F1000Research, KoreaMed Synapse, and ScienceCentral have been introduced as innovative full-text scholarly journal distribution systems. To publish web-based scholarly journals, it is necessary to adopt an open platform and to explore options such as an author profile database, an online collaborative editing module, and Crossref text and data mining services. To maximize the influence of local journals, it is necessary to integrate various external tools, such as researcher ID, research data, social media, and altmetrics services.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Korean researchers’ motivations for publishing in data journals and the usefulness of their data: a qualitative study
    Jungyeoun Lee, Jihyun Kim
    Science Editing.2021; 8(2): 145.     CrossRef
  • Is it possible to foster first-rate publishers through a journal publishing cooperative in Korea?
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(01): 3.     CrossRef
Original Article
Topics of major current interest in scholarly editing and publishing based on the content analysis of selected journals
Yeonok Chung
Sci Ed. 2015;2(2):59-62.   Published online August 14, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.45
  • 15,593 View
  • 103 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
For the purpose of obtaining a concrete picture of the main issues related to modern scholarly editing and publishing, a content analysis of the recent issues of three international journals devoted to scholarly editing and publishing, which are Learned Publishing, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, and European Science Editing, has been performed. The main topics in each of the 273 articles published in those journals over recent three years have been identified and classified into broad categories. The result has shown that the two most popular topics are open access publishing and peer review process. Other non-traditional topics currently receiving a great attention include bibliometrics, publication ethics, information technology applicable to editing and publishing, digital publishing, and literature databases. In order to keep up with the rapidly-developing field of scholarly editing and publishing and develop a local journal into an international journal of a high standard, it is important to remain keen to the latest development related to these topics.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Forecast of the Development of Russian Scientific Journals: The Publishers
    O. V. Moskaleva, M. A. Akoev
    Scholarly Research and Information.2020; 3(2-3): 131.     CrossRef
Training Material
Applying Open Researchers and Contributors ID in scholarly journals
Jeonghee Im
Sci Ed. 2015;2(1):28-31.   Published online February 28, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.33
  • 14,275 View
  • 124 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Open Researchers and Contributors ID (ORCID) launched its registry services in October 2012. Consequently, adding personal information to the ORCID registry became routine work for researchers. To add ORCID to an online article, the tag < contrib-id contrib-id-type = “orcid” > needs to be included in the Journal Article Tag Suite extensible markup language file, if such a file has been produced by the publisher. Subsequently, all co-authors’ ORCID can be easily and conveniently collected and then integrated into the manuscript management system. In the current age of information and the Internet, journals need to keep pace with the surge of new standards and technologies. Editors should be able to accept and apply these new systems rapidly.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
    Sun Huh
    Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions will be accepted for inclusion in Scopus
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 2.     CrossRef
  • Endocrinology and Metabolism Has Been Indexed in MEDLINE: A Major Achievement
    Won-Young Lee
    Endocrinology and Metabolism.2019; 34(2): 138.     CrossRef
  • Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
    Sun Huh
    Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524.     CrossRef
  • Endocrinology and Metabolism Is Indexed in the Emerging Sources Citation Index
    Won-Young Lee
    Endocrinology and Metabolism.2017; 32(3): 350.     CrossRef
  • How to PrepareEndocrinology and Metabolismfor Reapplication to MEDLINE
    Sun Huh
    Endocrinology and Metabolism.2017; 32(1): 58.     CrossRef
  • Promotion ofNeurointerventionto International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Neurointervention.2016; 11(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Gastric Cancer's Promotion to International Journal from the Perspective of Biliometric Analysis
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2016; 16(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • Status of digital standards in Korean medical journals in 2016
    Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2016; 3(2): 100.     CrossRef
  • Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery's Evolution into an International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2016; 8(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has been made in journal metrics two years after the citation analysis of theKorean Journal of Urology?
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Urology.2015; 56(4): 276.     CrossRef
  • Evidence of the Internationalization ofClinical EndoscopyBased on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(4): 317.     CrossRef
  • The Elevation ofAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicineto the Status of an International Journal After Adopting an English-Only Policy
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2015; 39(5): 661.     CrossRef
  • How much is Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions promoted based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2015; 12: 57.     CrossRef
Review
Peer review at the beginning of the 21st century
Irene Hames
Sci Ed. 2014;1(1):4-8.   Published online February 13, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.4
  • 21,685 View
  • 157 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF

Vigorous debate currently surrounds peer review, and polarized views are often expressed. Despite criticisms about the process, studies have found that it is still valued by researchers, with rigorous peer review being rated by authors as the most important service they expect to receive when paying to have their papers published open access. The expectations of peer review and what it can achieve need, however, to be realistic. Peer review is also only as good and effective as the people managing the process, and the large variation in standards that exists is one of the reasons some of the research and related communities have become critical of and disillusioned with the traditional model of peer review. The role of the editor is critical. All editors must act as proper editors, not just moving manuscripts automatically through the various stages, but making critical judgements throughout the process to reach sound and unbiased editorial decisions. New models and innovations in peer review are appearing. Many issues, however, remain the same: rigorous procedures and high ethical standards should be in place, those responsible for making decisions and managing the process need to be trained to equip them for their roles and responsibilities, and systems need to be adapted to deal with new challenges such as the increasing amounts of data being generated and needing to be taken into account when assessing the validity and soundness of work and the conclusions being drawn.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The challenge of recruiting peer reviewers from one medical journal’s perspective
    Christopher J. Peterson, Cynthia Orticio, Kenneth Nugent
    Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings.2022; 35(3): 394.     CrossRef
  • Effective Peer Review: Who, Where, or What?
    Russell P. Hall
    JID Innovations.2022; 2(6): 100162.     CrossRef
  • JID Innovations and Peer Review
    Russell P. Hall
    JID Innovations.2021; 1(3): 100056.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing reproducibility: Failures from Reproducibility Initiatives underline core challenges
    Kevin Mullane, Michael Williams
    Biochemical Pharmacology.2017; 138: 7.     CrossRef
  • Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers
    Tony Ross-Hellauer, Arvid Deppe, Birgit Schmidt, Jelte M. Wicherts
    PLOS ONE.2017; 12(12): e0189311.     CrossRef
  • Editing and publishing scholarly journals in the internet age
    Kihong Kim
    Science Editing.2014; 1(1): 2.     CrossRef
  • The big picture: scholarly publishing trends 2014
    Pippa Smart
    Science Editing.2014; 1(2): 52.     CrossRef

Science Editing : Science Editing