Science Editing

Original Articles

Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on Asian scholarly journal editors’ daily life, work, and opinions on future journal development: Yeonok Chung, Sue Kim, Sun Huh; Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):111-117. Published online August 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.204

6,493 View
175 Download
7 Web of Science
6 Crossref

Purpose
This study examined changes in Asian journal editors’ daily life and work during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and investigated their opinions on expected changes, thereby providing preliminary data to support the future needs of journal editors.
Methods
A survey questionnaire was developed and sent to 1,537 editors and staff of Asian scientific journals from July 13 to 19, 2020. The items gathered information on participants’ general characteristics, changes in daily life, changes in work life, anticipated future changes, and suggestions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results
Of the 152 respondents (response rate, 9.7%), most were editors. Fifty-seven respondents (37.5%) felt very or extremely anxious about the COVID-19 pandemic, and 101 (68.4%) reported spending more time on the internet. The workload of editing, reviewing, and publishing had increased for about one-third of respondents (34.2%, n = 52). Forty-four respondents (28.9%) said that the number of submissions had increased. Of the 68 editors who had received manuscripts on COVID-19, 30 (44.1%) prioritized them. Most respondents (73.7%, n = 112) predicted that online-only journal publishing would expand after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Conclusion
COVID-19 appears to be a source of anxiety to editors, which may be related to the increased time they spend on the internet. Some editors reported an increased workload. To promote online communication, a better environment and training tools are required. Editors and staff will need more opportunities to prepare for online publishing, as editors believed that the online-only publication of scholarly journals would accelerate after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Between panic and motivation: did the first wave of COVID-19 affect scientific publishing in Mediterranean countries?
Mona Farouk Ali
Scientometrics.2022; 127(6): 3083. CrossRef
Did anthropause generate a research pause during the pandemic? The experiences of a non‐medical journal
Jiao Zhang
Learned Publishing.2021; 34(3): 457. CrossRef
Was the number of submissions to scholarly journals in Korea affected by the COVID-19 pandemic?
Sun Huh
Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 117. CrossRef
COVID-19 and publishing
Kihong Kim
Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 109. CrossRef
Year in review and appreciation for 2020 reviewers
Sue Kim
Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing.2020; 26(4): 251. CrossRef
Reflections as 2020 comes to an end: the editing and educational environment during the COVID-19 pandemic, the power of Scopus and Web of Science in scholarly publishing, journal statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 44. CrossRef

Bibliographic and content analysis of physics papers from North Korea indexed in the Scopus from 2005 to 2018: Kihong Kim, Yeonok Chung; Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):35-40. Published online February 20, 2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.153

6,967 View
166 Download
6 Web of Science
5 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
It aimed at assessing the current status of physics research in North Korea through a bibliographic and content analysis of the physics papers from North Korea indexed in the Scopus from 2005 to 2018.
Methods
The Scopus was searched on January 18, 2019 by using the search option ‘Affiliation city’ with “Pyongyang OR Chongjin OR Hamhung OR Sariwon OR Wonsan OR Kimchaek” as the city name and 171 physics papers from North Korea written in English were identified. By performing supplementary searches based on the author names and the references, 46 papers belonging to physics were added and the total of 217 papers were identified. They were classified by publication year, co-authors’ country, institution, subfield, journal and author. Representative North Korean physicists and the active subfields of physics were identified.
Results
The number of physics papers from North Korea has been growing rapidly in the recent years. Physics research activities in North Korea were extremely centralized in its capital, Pyongyang, where all major research institutions were located. Major research areas included condensed matter physics, optics and high energy physics and the large majority of papers were theoretical ones. From a bibliographic and content analysis, sixteen representative or notable physicists in North Korea were identified.
Conclusion
It appears that the North Korean government is actively encouraging researchers to publish more papers in international journals. There is a strong growth potential in physics research in North Korea. In order to achieve balanced development in physics, it is an important task to build competitive experimental groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Co-authorship network analysis of North Korean chemistry researchers based on issues of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering published from 2008 to 2022: a bibliometric study
Eunmi Park, Ho-Yeol Yoon
Science Editing.2024; 11(1): 38. CrossRef
Mapping the development of North Korea's domestic nuclear research networks
Philip Baxter, Justin V. Hastings, Philseo Kim, Man‐Sung Yim
Review of Policy Research.2022; 39(2): 219. CrossRef
Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef
Bibliographic and content analysis of articles on education from Vietnam indexed in Scopus from 2009 to 2018
Cuong Huu Nguyen, Loc Thi My Nguyen, Trung Tran, Tien-Trung Nguyen
Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 45. CrossRef
A critical examination of international research conducted by North Korean authors: Increasing trends of collaborative research between China and North Korea
Eungi Kim, Eun Sil Kim
Scientometrics.2020; 124(1): 429. CrossRef

Review

Overview of journal metrics: Kihong Kim, Yeonok Chung; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):16-20. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.112

16,205 View
473 Download
25 Web of Science
21 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Various kinds of metrics used for the quantitative evaluation of scholarly journals are reviewed. The impact factor and related metrics including the immediacy index and the aggregate impact factor, which are provided by the Journal Citation Reports, are explained in detail. The Eigenfactor score and the article influence score are also reviewed. In addition, journal metrics such as CiteScore, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, SCImago Journal Rank, h-index, and g-index are discussed. Limitations and problems that these metrics have are pointed out. We should be cautious to rely on those quantitative measures too much when we evaluate journals or researchers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The introspections of contemporary business research: a call for scientific creativity
Kuldeep Singh
Society and Business Review.2024; 19(4): 648. CrossRef
Understanding Trends in Green Accounting Studies: A Bibliometrics Analysis
Sully Kemala Octisari, Dwi Artati, Irman Firmansyah, Arya Samudra Mahardhika, Romandhon, Aris Susetyo, Arif Sapta Yuniarto, Roni Budianto
HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration.2024; 15(1): 119. CrossRef
Tracking the trajectory of frankia research through bibliometrics: trends and future directions
Ridha Mhamdi, Maher Gtari
Canadian Journal of Microbiology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Analyzing AI use policy in LIS: association with journal metrics and publisher volume
Eungi Kim
Scientometrics.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Towards a new paradigm for ‘journal quality’ criteria: a scoping review
Mina Moradzadeh, Shahram Sedghi, Sirous Panahi
Scientometrics.2023; 128(1): 279. CrossRef
Recommendations and guidelines for creating scholarly biomedical journals: A scoping review
Jeremy Y. Ng, Kelly D. Cobey, Saad Ahmed, Valerie Chow, Sharleen G. Maduranayagam, Lucas J. Santoro, Lindsey Sikora, Ana Marusic, Daniel Shanahan, Randy Townsend, Alan Ehrlich, Alfonso Iorio, David Moher, Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh
PLOS ONE.2023; 18(3): e0282168. CrossRef
A multidimensional journal evaluation framework based on the Pareto‐dominated set measured by the Manhattan distance
Xinxin Xu, Ziqiang Zeng, Yurui Chang
Learned Publishing.2023; 36(4): 619. CrossRef
Journal quality criteria: Measurement and significance
O. V. Kirillova, E. V. Tikhonova
Science Editor and Publisher.2022; 7(1): 12. CrossRef
Bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence algorithms used for microbial fuel cell research
Luis Erick Coy-Aceves, Benito Corona-Vasquez
Water Practice and Technology.2022; 17(10): 2071. CrossRef
Predicting the citation count and CiteScore of journals one year in advance
William L. Croft, Jörg-Rüdiger Sack
Journal of Informetrics.2022; 16(4): 101349. CrossRef
The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20. CrossRef
Kind Attention to the Altitude of Altmetrics
Shekar Shobana
Brazilian Dental Journal.2020; 31(5): 457. CrossRef
Comments on “Scientificity and H-Index.”
Ali Yavuz KARAHAN
Acta Medica Alanya.2020; 4(2): 203. CrossRef
Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics
Ernesto Roldan-Valadez, Shirley Yoselin Salazar-Ruiz, Rafael Ibarra-Contreras, Camilo Rios
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).2019; 188(3): 939. CrossRef
CiteScore metrics: Creating journal metrics from the Scopus citation index
Chris James, Lisa Colledge, Wim Meester, Norman Azoulay, Andrew Plume
Learned Publishing.2019; 32(4): 367. CrossRef
High Impact and Highly Cited Peer-Reviewed Journal Article Publications by Canadian Occupational Therapy Authors: A Bibliometric Analysis
Ted Brown, Yuh-Shan Ho, Sharon A. Gutman
Occupational Therapy In Health Care.2019; 33(4): 329. CrossRef
Corrective factors for author- and journal-based metrics impacted by citations to accommodate for retractions
Judit Dobránszki, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Scientometrics.2019; 121(1): 387. CrossRef
A New Metric for the Analysis of the Scientific Article Citation Network
Livia Lin-Hsuan Chang, Frederick Kin Hing Phoa, Junji Nakano
IEEE Access.2019; 7: 132027. CrossRef
Bibliographic measures of top-tier finance and information systems journals
Thomas Krueger, Jack Shorter
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.2019; 12(5): 841. CrossRef
Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
Sun Huh
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137. CrossRef
Journal Metrics of Infection & Chemotherapy and Current Scholarly Journal Publication Issues
Sun Huh
Infection & Chemotherapy.2018; 50(3): 219. CrossRef

Original Articles

Rapid growth of international collaboration from articles indexed in Scopus database by researchers in Korea from 2006 to 2015: Yeonok Chung, Kihong Kim; Sci Ed. 2017;4(1):18-23. Published online February 20, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.84

9,816 View
155 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Abstract PDF

It aimed at analyzing the trends of international collaboration from articles indexed in Scopus by researchers in Korea from 2006 to 2015. The number of articles coauthored by researchers in Korea and those in selected foreign countries was obtained from document searches of the Scopus database. The growth of research collaboration in various academic disciplines was also studied. There were 22 countries which produced over 2,000 papers in collaboration with researchers in Korea during the ten-year period between 2006 and 2015. The average of the average annual growth rate taken over these 22 countries was 12.9%. In 9 additional Asian, Latin American, and African countries, more rapid growth of international research collaboration was clearly seen. Though research collaboration is most active in the field of physics and astronomy with most countries, it was found that the growth of collaboration in medicine was most remarkable in Southeast Asian countries. It may be originated from the intimate relationship between Korea and Southeast Asia and the leadership of Korean physicians in that region.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Reflections on the Basic Manuscript Editors’ Training 2017
Hakbong Lee
Science Editing.2017; 4(2): 93. CrossRef

Patterns of citation when Korean scientists cite other Korean scientists: Yeonok Chung, Kihong Kim; Sci Ed. 2016;3(2):90-93. Published online August 20, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.71

9,504 View
142 Download
1 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Citation patterns of Korean scientists are investigated by analyzing the references of the papers authored by Korean chemists and published in two journals of different standing. Particular interest is given to how frequently Korean researchers quote the papers written by other Korean researchers and whether there is any difference in the citation pattern when Korean researchers publish their papers in a top international journal or in a domestic journal. Two journals in the category of multidisciplinary chemistry, the Journal of the American Chemical Society and the Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, are chosen and a detailed analysis of the references of the papers written by Korean authors in 2015 was performed. The author self-citation rate is found to be much larger than the citation rate of other Korean authors. It is also found that the percentage of self-citations and the percentage of the references by Korean authors excluding self-citations are both significantly larger in the Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society than in the Journal of the American Chemical Society. Interpretations of the results based on social exchange theory are proposed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Evolution of the intellectual structure of clothing and textiles literature
Joon-Ho Seon, Seong Eun Kim, Hyun-Jung Lee, Kyu-Hye Lee
The Research Journal of the Costume Culture.2019; 27(4): 299. CrossRef

Topics of major current interest in scholarly editing and publishing based on the content analysis of selected journals: Yeonok Chung; Sci Ed. 2015;2(2):59-62. Published online August 14, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.45

16,108 View
104 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Abstract PDF

For the purpose of obtaining a concrete picture of the main issues related to modern scholarly editing and publishing, a content analysis of the recent issues of three international journals devoted to scholarly editing and publishing, which are Learned Publishing, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, and European Science Editing, has been performed. The main topics in each of the 273 articles published in those journals over recent three years have been identified and classified into broad categories. The result has shown that the two most popular topics are open access publishing and peer review process. Other non-traditional topics currently receiving a great attention include bibliometrics, publication ethics, information technology applicable to editing and publishing, digital publishing, and literature databases. In order to keep up with the rapidly-developing field of scholarly editing and publishing and develop a local journal into an international journal of a high standard, it is important to remain keen to the latest development related to these topics.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Forecast of the Development of Russian Scientific Journals: The Publishers
O. V. Moskaleva, M. A. Akoev
Scholarly Research and Information.2020; 3(2-3): 131. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search