KCSE
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
Case Study
- Proposal of the S-score for measuring the performance of researchers, institutions, and journals in Indonesia
- Lukman Lukman, Muhammad Dimyati, Yan Rianto, Imam Much Ibnu Subroto, Tole Sutikno, Deden Sumirat Hidayat, Irene M Nadhiroh, Deris Stiawan, Sam Farisa Chaerul Haviana, Ahmad Heryanto, Herman Yuliansyah
- Sci Ed. 2018;5(2):135-141. Published online August 20, 2018
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.138
- 19,629 View
- 311 Download
- 10 Web of Science
- 7 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF - This study aimed to propose a tool for measuring the research performance of researchers, institutions, and journals in Indonesia based on bibliometrics. Specifically, the output of this measurement tool, referred to as the S-score, is described, as well as its implementation on the main database portal in Indonesia. The S-score was developed by a focus group discussion. The following 8 evaluation items for journal accreditation were analyzed in the development process: journal title, aims and scope; publisher; editorial and journal management; quality of articles; writing style; format of PDF and e-journal; regularity; and dissemination. The elements of the S-score are as follows: number of journal article documents in Scopus, number of non-journalarticle in Scopus, number of citations in Scopus, number of citations in Google Scholar, the hindex in Scopus, and the h-index in Google Scholar. The S-score yields results ranging from S1 to S6. The above metrics were implemented on the Science and Technology Index, a database portal in Indonesia. The measurement tool developed through the focus group discussion was successfully implemented on the database portal. Its validity and reliability should be monitored consistently through regular assessments of S-scores. The S-score may be a good example of a metric for measuring the performance of researchers, institutions, and journals in countries where most journals are not indexed by Scopus.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Disciplinary and institutional shifts: decomposing deviations in the country-level proportions of conference papers in Scopus
Denis Kosyakov, Andrey Guskov
Scientometrics.2024; 129(3): 1697. CrossRef - Procesos editoriales en revistas científicas: Un análisis bibliométrico a partir de artículos en acceso abierto
Elí Vicente Raudales-García , Wileidys Artigas, Benjamín Barón Velandia, Nicolás Sumba Nacipucha , Jorge Cueva Estrada
Biblios Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.2024; (87): e008. CrossRef - Understanding the meanings of citations using sentiment, role, and citation function classifications
Indra Budi, Yaniasih Yaniasih
Scientometrics.2023; 128(1): 735. CrossRef - Indonesian Scientists’ Behavior Relative to Research Data Governance in Preventing WMD-Applicable Technology Transfer
Lindung Parningotan Manik, Zaenal Akbar, Aris Yaman, Ariani Indrawati
Publications.2022; 10(4): 50. CrossRef - Systematic Design and Evaluation of a Citation Function Classification Scheme in Indonesian Journals
Yaniasih Yaniasih, Indra Budi
Publications.2021; 9(3): 27. CrossRef - Policies of scholarly journal accreditation in Indonesia
Prakoso Bhairawa Putera, Suryanto Suryanto, Sinta Ningrum, Ida Widianingsih, Yan Rianto
Science Editing.2021; 8(2): 166. CrossRef - Design data collection tool and weighting classification of authors in their scholar outputs based on percent-contribution-indicated (PCI) method
A F Rochim, T Nugraha, A P Widodo, D Eridani, K T Martono
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.2021; 1943(1): 012111. CrossRef
- Disciplinary and institutional shifts: decomposing deviations in the country-level proportions of conference papers in Scopus
First
Prev
