Exploring Metaverse Literacy: Immersive Technologies in Library Environments A. Subaveerapandiyan, Arunima Baiju, Naved Ahmad, Manoj Kumar Verma, Priyanka Sinha Journal of Web Librarianship.2024; 18(2): 39. CrossRef
Facing the challenges of metaverse: a systematic literature review from Social Sciences and Marketing and Communication Verónica Crespo-Pereira, Eva Sánchez-Amboage, Matías Membiela-Pollán El Profesional de la información.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Emergence of the metaverse and ChatGPT in journal publishing after the COVID-19 pandemic Sun Huh Science Editing.2023; 10(1): 1. CrossRef
Advances in Metaverse Investigation: Streams of Research and Future Agenda Mariapina Trunfio, Simona Rossi Virtual Worlds.2022; 1(2): 103. CrossRef
What the Literature on Medicine, Nursing, Public Health, Midwifery, and Dentistry Reveals: An Overview of the Rapidly Approaching Metaverse Muhammet DAMAR Journal of Metaverse.2022; 2(2): 62. CrossRef
Between panic and motivation: did the first wave of COVID-19 affect scientific publishing in Mediterranean countries? Mona Farouk Ali Scientometrics.2022; 127(6): 3083. CrossRef
Did anthropause generate a research pause during the pandemic? The experiences of a non‐medical journal Jiao Zhang Learned Publishing.2021; 34(3): 457. CrossRef
Information support in scientific paper preparation management on the basis of intelligent review analysis В.А. Латыпова МОДЕЛИРОВАНИЕ, ОПТИМИЗАЦИЯ И ИНФОРМАЦИОННЫЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ.2022; 10(1(36)): 5. CrossRef
Was the number of submissions to scholarly journals in Korea affected by the COVID-19 pandemic? Sun Huh Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 117. CrossRef
Artificial intelligence-assisted tools for redefining the communication landscape of the scholarly world Habeeb Ibrahim Abdul Razack, Sam T. Mathew, Fathinul Fikri Ahmad Saad, Saleh A. Alqahtani Science Editing.2021; 8(2): 134. CrossRef
Impact of COVID-19 on the duration of the peer review process of the Journal of Animal Science and Technology Sejong Oh Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 198. CrossRef
Reflections as 2020 comes to an end: the editing and educational environment during the COVID-19 pandemic, the power of Scopus and Web of Science in scholarly publishing, journal statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers Sun Huh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 44. CrossRef
Purpose It aimed at assessing the current status of physics research in North Korea through a bibliographic and content analysis of the physics papers from North Korea indexed in the Scopus from 2005 to 2018.
Methods The Scopus was searched on January 18, 2019 by using the search option ‘Affiliation city’ with “Pyongyang OR Chongjin OR Hamhung OR Sariwon OR Wonsan OR Kimchaek” as the city name and 171 physics papers from North Korea written in English were identified. By performing supplementary searches based on the author names and the references, 46 papers belonging to physics were added and the total of 217 papers were identified. They were classified by publication year, co-authors’ country, institution, subfield, journal and author. Representative North Korean physicists and the active subfields of physics were identified.
Results The number of physics papers from North Korea has been growing rapidly in the recent years. Physics research activities in North Korea were extremely centralized in its capital, Pyongyang, where all major research institutions were located. Major research areas included condensed matter physics, optics and high energy physics and the large majority of papers were theoretical ones. From a bibliographic and content analysis, sixteen representative or notable physicists in North Korea were identified.
Conclusion It appears that the North Korean government is actively encouraging researchers to publish more papers in international journals. There is a strong growth potential in physics research in North Korea. In order to achieve balanced development in physics, it is an important task to build competitive experimental groups.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Co-authorship network analysis of North Korean chemistry researchers based on issues of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering published from 2008 to 2022:
a bibliometric study Eunmi Park, Ho-Yeol Yoon Science Editing.2024; 11(1): 38. CrossRef
Mapping the development of North Korea's domestic nuclear research networks Philip Baxter, Justin V. Hastings, Philseo Kim, Man‐Sung Yim Review of Policy Research.2022; 39(2): 219. CrossRef
Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study Sun Huh Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef
Bibliographic and content analysis of articles on education from Vietnam indexed in Scopus from 2009 to 2018 Cuong Huu Nguyen, Loc Thi My Nguyen, Trung Tran, Tien-Trung Nguyen Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 45. CrossRef
A critical examination of international research conducted by North Korean authors: Increasing trends of collaborative research between China and North Korea Eungi Kim, Eun Sil Kim Scientometrics.2020; 124(1): 429. CrossRef
Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref Sun Huh Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377. CrossRef
Is it possible to foster first-rate publishers through a journal publishing cooperative in Korea? Sun Huh Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(01): 3. CrossRef
Various kinds of metrics used for the quantitative evaluation of scholarly journals are reviewed. The impact factor and related metrics including the immediacy index and the aggregate impact factor, which are provided by the Journal Citation Reports, are explained in detail. The Eigenfactor score and the article influence score are also reviewed. In addition, journal metrics such as CiteScore, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, SCImago Journal Rank, h-index, and g-index are discussed. Limitations and problems that these metrics have are pointed out. We should be cautious to rely on those quantitative measures too much when we evaluate journals or researchers.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The introspections of contemporary business research: a call for scientific creativity Kuldeep Singh Society and Business Review.2024; 19(4): 648. CrossRef
Understanding Trends in Green Accounting Studies: A Bibliometrics Analysis Sully Kemala Octisari, Dwi Artati, Irman Firmansyah, Arya Samudra Mahardhika, Romandhon, Aris Susetyo, Arif Sapta Yuniarto, Roni Budianto HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration.2024; 15(1): 119. CrossRef
Towards a new paradigm for ‘journal quality’ criteria: a scoping review Mina Moradzadeh, Shahram Sedghi, Sirous Panahi Scientometrics.2023; 128(1): 279. CrossRef
Recommendations and guidelines for creating scholarly biomedical journals: A scoping review Jeremy Y. Ng, Kelly D. Cobey, Saad Ahmed, Valerie Chow, Sharleen G. Maduranayagam, Lucas J. Santoro, Lindsey Sikora, Ana Marusic, Daniel Shanahan, Randy Townsend, Alan Ehrlich, Alfonso Iorio, David Moher, Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh PLOS ONE.2023; 18(3): e0282168. CrossRef
A multidimensional journal evaluation framework based on the Pareto‐dominated set measured by the Manhattan distance Xinxin Xu, Ziqiang Zeng, Yurui Chang Learned Publishing.2023; 36(4): 619. CrossRef
Journal quality criteria: Measurement and significance O. V. Kirillova, E. V. Tikhonova Science Editor and Publisher.2022; 7(1): 12. CrossRef
Bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence algorithms used for microbial fuel cell research Luis Erick Coy-Aceves, Benito Corona-Vasquez Water Practice and Technology.2022; 17(10): 2071. CrossRef
Predicting the citation count and CiteScore of journals one year in advance William L. Croft, Jörg-Rüdiger Sack Journal of Informetrics.2022; 16(4): 101349. CrossRef
The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021 Sun Huh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20. CrossRef
Kind Attention to the Altitude of Altmetrics Shekar Shobana Brazilian Dental Journal.2020; 31(5): 457. CrossRef
Comments on “Scientificity and H-Index.” Ali Yavuz KARAHAN Acta Medica Alanya.2020; 4(2): 203. CrossRef
Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics Ernesto Roldan-Valadez, Shirley Yoselin Salazar-Ruiz, Rafael Ibarra-Contreras, Camilo Rios Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).2019; 188(3): 939. CrossRef
CiteScore metrics: Creating journal metrics from the Scopus citation index Chris James, Lisa Colledge, Wim Meester, Norman Azoulay, Andrew Plume Learned Publishing.2019; 32(4): 367. CrossRef
High Impact and Highly Cited Peer-Reviewed Journal Article Publications by Canadian Occupational Therapy Authors: A Bibliometric Analysis Ted Brown, Yuh-Shan Ho, Sharon A. Gutman Occupational Therapy In Health Care.2019; 33(4): 329. CrossRef
Corrective factors for author- and journal-based metrics impacted by citations to accommodate for retractions Judit Dobránszki, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva Scientometrics.2019; 121(1): 387. CrossRef
A New Metric for the Analysis of the Scientific Article Citation Network Livia Lin-Hsuan Chang, Frederick Kin Hing Phoa, Junji Nakano IEEE Access.2019; 7: 132027. CrossRef
Bibliographic measures of top-tier finance and information systems journals Thomas Krueger, Jack Shorter Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.2019; 12(5): 841. CrossRef
Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection Sun Huh Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137. CrossRef
Journal Metrics of Infection & Chemotherapy and Current Scholarly Journal Publication Issues Sun Huh Infection & Chemotherapy.2018; 50(3): 219. CrossRef