Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref Sun Huh Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377. CrossRef
Is it possible to foster first-rate publishers through a journal publishing cooperative in Korea? Sun Huh Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(01): 3. CrossRef
Out of East Asian languages which do not use the Latin alphabet, Japanese is a very complicated writing system that uses “kanji,” which are ideograms, and “kana,” which are phonetic characters. Most of the Japanese papers published so far using Journal Article Tag Suite (JATS) are science, technology, and medicine fields adapting horizontal writing systems, which are structurally consistent with English papers. Most of them only replace Latin letters with Japanese characters. In this presentation, we suggested method of presenting vertically oriented Japanese humanities articles in JATS XML. For vertical description of Chinese numeric, we would like to propose the introduction of an element which specifies description direction. Alternatively, could be used as a hidden command when creating a document. We propose the following notation in the part of the number that can be converted: 六五. Chinese numeric 六五 is a Arabic numeric 65. With this, it is shown that 六五 of Chinese numerals can be converted to 65 in Arabic numerals. For vertical text description with JATS, we would like to suggest adding @ writing-mode as an attribute to :. Furthermore, note and references should be differentiated for example, between a and a in the future. As Kanji are ideograms, there are variations that cannot be expressed with UTF-8. If these difficult Kanji are included in the JATS text, it will be necessary to decide on their description method. For the propagation of use of JATS XML for non-Latin characters articles, the structure of the document for example, vertical description, and special presentation should be considered more widely.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Reflections as 2020 comes to an end: the editing and educational environment during the COVID-19 pandemic, the power of Scopus and Web of Science in scholarly publishing, journal statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers Sun Huh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 44. CrossRef
This review article presents the latest trends in innovative global scholarly journal publication and distribution platforms, with implications for local journals. Changes have taken place in distribution policies, as pre-publication distribution has become a viable option, and for post-publication distribution, public access or mandatory open access policies have been introduced for articles supported by public or governmental funds. New formats of articles include graphical abstracts, interactive PDFs, the application of semantic enhancements, and the utilization of research data, social networking sites, such as Mendeley and ResearchGate, have become common sites for information exchange. Altmetrics have been adopted to complement traditional journal metrics. PubMed Central, F1000Research, KoreaMed Synapse, and ScienceCentral have been introduced as innovative full-text scholarly journal distribution systems. To publish web-based scholarly journals, it is necessary to adopt an open platform and to explore options such as an author profile database, an online collaborative editing module, and Crossref text and data mining services. To maximize the influence of local journals, it is necessary to integrate various external tools, such as researcher ID, research data, social media, and altmetrics services.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Korean researchers’ motivations for publishing in data journals and the usefulness of their data: a qualitative study Jungyeoun Lee, Jihyun Kim Science Editing.2021; 8(2): 145. CrossRef
Is it possible to foster first-rate publishers through a journal publishing cooperative in Korea? Sun Huh Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(01): 3. CrossRef
In October 1946, mathematicians and physicists founded the Korean Society of Mathematics and Physics, which was relaunched as the Korean Mathematical Society (KMS) in March 1952. This article presents the history of three journals published by the KMS. Volume 1 of the first journal, Mathematics Education, was published in 1955, but it was discontinued after publication of volume 3. After that, as the KMS was reorganized in the 1960s, it began once more to publish a journal in 1964, with the title Mathematics. Later, Mathematics was divided into the Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society and the Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society. A third journal, Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society, was first published in 1986. Since then, a total of three journals have been published by the KMS. We can conceive of the years before 1980 as an era focused on education, while the subsequent years have constituted a research era. In this period, mathematics in Korea achieved remarkable growth through extensive international collaboration in research and the internationalization of journals of the KMS. In particular, the Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society and Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society achieved being indexed in SCIE, while Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society achieved being indexed in ESCI, a stage that precedes being indexed in SCIE. The journals published by the KMS will continue to serve as a venue for outstanding research results from throughout the world to be published and contribute greatly to the international growth of Korean mathematical capabilities.
This study presents an update of a previous study, ‘Bibliometric analysis of publications from North Korea indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection from 1988 to 2016,’ which was published in Science Editing volume 4, issue 1. A re-analysis was performed because an incomplete search strategy was used in the original publication, and the present study analyzed the same bibliometric characteristics of publications from North Korea indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection from 1978 to 2018. The Web of Science Core Collection was searched by selecting ‘North Korea’ in the country field of the basic search results on July 31, 2018. A total of 533 articles were identified. There were no results from before 1978. China, Germany, and Australia were main countries of collaboration. Researchers from Kim Il Sung University produced the most articles. The main research fields were physics, mathematics, materials science, chemistry, and engineering. The funding agencies were mostly from China. The number of articles by North Korean authors only was 105, with the same main research fields. The results were almost the same as reported in the previous article, except for a much higher number of publications. The above results indicate that the North Korean government has asked researchers to publish their works in international journals; therefore, it has allowed them to access the internet. Based on the trends we identified, we anticipate that there will be a continuous increase in publications from North Korea in international journals indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Mapping the development of North Korea's domestic nuclear research networks Philip Baxter, Justin V. Hastings, Philseo Kim, Man‐Sung Yim Review of Policy Research.2022; 39(2): 219. CrossRef
Military technology and the North Korean economy: evidence from time‐series data Jang C. Jin, Go En Chang Asian-Pacific Economic Literature.2022; 36(2): 106. CrossRef
Bibliometric Analysis Of Fisheries Policy Articles In The Journal Scopus Written By Authors From Affiliates Of The 10 Best Universities In Indonesia Eki Darmawan, Ida Widianingsih, Rahman Mulyawan, Mudiyati Rahmatunnisa IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.2022; 1095(1): 012014. CrossRef
Bibliographic and content analysis of articles on education from Vietnam indexed in Scopus from 2009 to 2018 Cuong Huu Nguyen, Loc Thi My Nguyen, Trung Tran, Tien-Trung Nguyen Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 45. CrossRef
A critical examination of international research conducted by North Korean authors: Increasing trends of collaborative research between China and North Korea Eungi Kim, Eun Sil Kim Scientometrics.2020; 124(1): 429. CrossRef
A bibliometric analysis of articles on innovation systems in Scopus journals written by authors from Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia Prakoso Bhairawa Putera, Suryanto Suryanto, Sinta Ningrum, Ida Widianingsih Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 177. CrossRef
Bibliographic and content analysis of physics papers from North Korea indexed in the Scopus from 2005 to 2018 Kihong Kim, Yeonok Chung Science Editing.2019; 6(1): 35. CrossRef
Network analysis of scientific collaboration in North Korea Hyung Wook Choi, Ye Jin Choi, Soon Kim Science Editing.2019; 6(1): 25. CrossRef
To improve scholarly communications with scientists throughout the world, an international-level manuscript management system is indispensable. We analyzed the manuscript management systems currently in use in Korea and suggested ways to improve these domestic systems through benchmarking with representative overseas systems. Drawing information from the manufacturer’s documentation, we compared the functionalities of the major manuscript management systems available in Korea to international systems. Based on this analysis, we identified the essential elements necessary to meet international standards. The representative international systems provide an intuitive interface and an efficient communication channel for authors, editors, and reviewers, enabling them to save time. The two domestic paid systems are almost at the international level; however, the free systems developed in Korea need to be upgraded. In particular, more advanced visualization tools, more efficient tools for communication between stakeholders, and convenient linking to external content are needed. Studies of these manuscript management systems, which are essential for the internationalization of domestic journals, can be utilized as primary materials to improve the level of Korean academic journals in response to the rapid changes in modern scholarly communication.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review Kayvan Kousha, Mike Thelwall Learned Publishing.2024; 37(1): 4. CrossRef
Should publishers use online submission systems to harvest authors’ responses to diversity, equity and inclusion? J. A. Teixeira da Silva Science Editor and Publisher.2023; 7(2): 210. CrossRef
An Exploratory Study into Professional Scholarly Journals Publishing Software Adoption in Lithuania Vincas Grigas, Arūnas Gudinavičius, Tomas Petreikis, Andrius Šuminas Information & Media.2023; 96: 179. CrossRef
A Blockchain-Based Editorial Management System Eman-Yaser Daraghmi, Mamoun Abu Helou, Yousef-Awwad Daraghmi, omar cheikhrouhou Security and Communication Networks.2021; 2021: 1. CrossRef
Artificial intelligence-assisted tools for redefining the communication landscape of the scholarly world Habeeb Ibrahim Abdul Razack, Sam T. Mathew, Fathinul Fikri Ahmad Saad, Saleh A. Alqahtani Science Editing.2021; 8(2): 134. CrossRef
The “invisible hand” of peer review: The implications of author-referee networks on peer review in a scholarly journal Pierpaolo Dondio, Niccolò Casnici, Francisco Grimaldo, Nigel Gilbert, Flaminio Squazzoni Journal of Informetrics.2019; 13(2): 708. CrossRef
Lukman Lukman, Muhammad Dimyati, Yan Rianto, Imam Much Ibnu Subroto, Tole Sutikno, Deden Sumirat Hidayat, Irene M Nadhiroh, Deris Stiawan, Sam Farisa Chaerul Haviana, Ahmad Heryanto, Herman Yuliansyah
Sci Ed. 2018;5(2):135-141. Published online August 20, 2018
This study aimed to propose a tool for measuring the research performance of researchers, institutions, and journals in Indonesia based on bibliometrics. Specifically, the output of this measurement tool, referred to as the S-score, is described, as well as its implementation on the main database portal in Indonesia. The S-score was developed by a focus group discussion. The following 8 evaluation items for journal accreditation were analyzed in the development process: journal title, aims and scope; publisher; editorial and journal management; quality of articles; writing style; format of PDF and e-journal; regularity; and dissemination. The elements of the S-score are as follows: number of journal article documents in Scopus, number of non-journalarticle in Scopus, number of citations in Scopus, number of citations in Google Scholar, the hindex in Scopus, and the h-index in Google Scholar. The S-score yields results ranging from S1 to S6. The above metrics were implemented on the Science and Technology Index, a database portal in Indonesia. The measurement tool developed through the focus group discussion was successfully implemented on the database portal. Its validity and reliability should be monitored consistently through regular assessments of S-scores. The S-score may be a good example of a metric for measuring the performance of researchers, institutions, and journals in countries where most journals are not indexed by Scopus.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Disciplinary and institutional shifts: decomposing deviations in the country-level proportions of conference papers in Scopus Denis Kosyakov, Andrey Guskov Scientometrics.2024; 129(3): 1697. CrossRef
Understanding the meanings of citations using sentiment, role, and citation function classifications Indra Budi, Yaniasih Yaniasih Scientometrics.2023; 128(1): 735. CrossRef
Indonesian Scientists’ Behavior Relative to Research Data Governance in Preventing WMD-Applicable Technology Transfer Lindung Parningotan Manik, Zaenal Akbar, Aris Yaman, Ariani Indrawati Publications.2022; 10(4): 50. CrossRef
Systematic Design and Evaluation of a Citation Function Classification Scheme in Indonesian Journals Yaniasih Yaniasih, Indra Budi Publications.2021; 9(3): 27. CrossRef
Policies of scholarly journal accreditation in Indonesia Prakoso Bhairawa Putera, Suryanto Suryanto, Sinta Ningrum, Ida Widianingsih, Yan Rianto Science Editing.2021; 8(2): 166. CrossRef
Design data collection tool and weighting classification of authors in their scholar outputs based on percent-contribution-indicated (PCI) method A F Rochim, T Nugraha, A P Widodo, D Eridani, K T Martono Journal of Physics: Conference Series.2021; 1943(1): 012111. CrossRef
Conventions of English Research Discourse and the Writing of Non-Anglophone Authors Tatyana Yakhontova Journal of Korean Medical Science.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
De-naturalizing the “predatory”: A study of “bogus” publications at public sector universities in Pakistan Waqar Ali Shah, Rukhsana Ali, Asadullah Lashari Accountability in Research.2024; 31(2): 80. CrossRef
Facilitators and barriers to dealing with questionable journals in management science Mehdi Dadkhah, Fariborz Rahimnia, Aamir Raoof Memon Library Hi Tech.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Citation contagion: a citation analysis of selected predatory marketing journals Salim Moussa Scientometrics.2021; 126(1): 485. CrossRef
How to Protect the Credibility of Articles Published in Predatory Journals Yuki Yamada Publications.2021; 9(1): 4. CrossRef
Contamination by citations: references to predatory journals in the peer-reviewed marketing literature Salim Moussa South Asian Journal of Marketing.2021; 2(1): 5. CrossRef
Research Combining Physical Activity and Sleep: A Bibliometric Analysis Aamir R. Memon, Corneel Vandelanotte, Timothy Olds, Mitch J. Duncan, Grace E. Vincent Perceptual and Motor Skills.2020; 127(1): 154. CrossRef
Predatory publishing, hijacking of legitimate journals and impersonation of researchers via special issue announcements: a warning for editors and authors about a new scam Jamie Trapp Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine.2020; 43(1): 9. CrossRef
Predatory Publishers/Journals in Medical Sciences: How to Avoid, Stop, and What to Do after Being Scammed by Them? Yosef Mohammed-Azzam Zakout Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2020; 51(3): 782. CrossRef
Awareness of predatory publishing for Peruvian university professors and lecturers doing research Carlos Sotomayor-Beltran Accountability in Research.2020; 27(6): 390. CrossRef
‘At-risk articles’: the imperative to recover lost science Jeanette Hatherill Insights the UKSG journal.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Revisiting the Term Predatory Open Access Publishing Aamir Raoof Memon Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
A cross-sectional study of predatory publishing emails received by career development grant awardees Tracey A Wilkinson, Christopher J Russell, William E Bennett, Erika R Cheng, Aaron E Carroll BMJ Open.2019; 9(5): e027928. CrossRef
Disparities of Health Program Information Systems in Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Indonesian Health Facility Research 2019 Sri Idaiani, Harimat Hendarwan, Maria Holly Herawati International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2023; 20(5): 4384. CrossRef
Health Information System Research Situation in Indonesia: A Bibliometric Analysis Masyri Madjido, Aufia Espressivo, Ahmad Watsiq Maula, Anis Fuad, Mubasysyir Hasanbasri Procedia Computer Science.2019; 161: 781. CrossRef
Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in Korean academic society-published journals listed in Journal Citation Reports
Ye Jin Choi, Hyung Wook Choi, Soon Kim Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 24. CrossRef
Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in academic society published journals Hyung Wook Choi, Ye Jin Choi, Soon Kim Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 112. CrossRef
Journal Metrics of Infection & Chemotherapy and Current Scholarly Journal Publication Issues Sun Huh Infection & Chemotherapy.2018; 50(3): 219. CrossRef