With the fast development of open access publishing worldwide, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) as a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals, has been recognized for its high criteria in facilitating high quality open access scholarly publishing and used as the portal for accessing quality open access journals. While the numbers of journal application to be inclusion in DOAJ in Asia are kept increasing dramatically, many editors of these journals are not very clear about the idea or concept of the open access which have been embedded in the application form containing 58 questions falling into several different criteria categories. The very commonly seen misunderstanding of the required item, inaccurate or vague or incomplete and even missing information, poorly organized website, non-transparent process of publishing, especially no open access statement and copyright statement, or conflicts between the policy statements would cause much more communication between the reviewer and the editor and delay the completion of the review. This article gives an in depth introduction to DOAJ criteria and detailed introduction to the general process on how to register to DOAJ, suggestions based on application review also is given for journal editors to better prepare for this application. And it is the most important for editors to keep in mind that to be indexed by DOAJ is not just about filling a form, it is about truly change and adapt to best practices in open access publishing.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Mapping the open access publications of Indian non-profit organizations over the last 20 years based on OpenAlex insights Rima Hazarika, Abhijit Roy, K.G. Sudhier Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
An Altmetrics and citation analysis of selected predatory journals in library and information science field Ming Chen, Linzi Wang The Journal of Academic Librarianship.2022; 48(6): 102618. CrossRef
Examining the Research Evolution on the Socio-Economic and Environmental Dimensions on University Social Responsibility Víctor Meseguer-Sánchez, Emilio Abad-Segura, Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña, Valentín Molina-Moreno International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(13): 4729. CrossRef
Challenge of Ukrainian academic librarians in an evolving scholarly publishing landscape Serhii Nazarovets, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Maryna Nazarovets The Journal of Academic Librarianship.2019; 45(1): 9. CrossRef
Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools Armen Yuri Gasparyan, Marlen Yessirkepov, Alexander A. Voronov, Anna M. Koroleva, George D. Kitas Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
The DOAJ Spring Cleaning 2016 and What Was Removed—Tragic Loss or Good Riddance? Jan Erik Frantsvåg Publications.2019; 7(3): 45. CrossRef
How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013 Sun Huh Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95. CrossRef
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research's promotion to internationally competitive journal evidenced by journal metrics Sun Huh Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research.2017; 6(2): 67. CrossRef
Equality, equity, and reality of open access on scholarly information Jeong-Wook Seo, Hosik Chung, Tae-Sul Seo, Youngim Jung, Eun Seong Hwang, Cheol-Heui Yun, Hyungsun Kim Science Editing.2017; 4(2): 58. CrossRef
Humanities and social sciences studies in Korea have remarkably low rates of co-authorship between professors and students. We chose a bibliometrics-based approach to characterize changes in the ratio of joint authorship between professors and students. Articles classified in the humanities and social sciences sectors that were published in journals registered in the Korean Citation Index during 2 phases over a 10-year period—2004 to 2006 (phase 1) and 2011 to 2013 (phase 2)—were used as the main source for the analysis. The study results can be summarized as follows: first, the overall number of co-authored articles drastically increased from phase 1 to phase 2; the percentage of co-authorship articles increased from 34.8% to 47.7%, and the percentage of co-authorship between students and professors rose from 9.9% to 20.7%. This trend was particularly noticeable in the social sciences, such as accounting, social welfare, and economics/business administration. Second, papers written by scholars from Seoul National University, Yonsei University, and Korea University were often published in high-impact factor journals. Among those articles, the rate of professor-student co-authorship increased by 21.6% for 7 years. Third, the increase in professor-student co-authored articles published in high- impact factor journals was even sharper. These findings indicate that perceptions of professor-student co-authorship have changed in the humanities and social sciences. In the near future, positive perceptions toward joint research and joint authorship between professors and students are expected to become more widespread.
It aimed at analyzing the trends of international collaboration from articles indexed in Scopus by researchers in Korea from 2006 to 2015. The number of articles coauthored by researchers in Korea and those in selected foreign countries was obtained from document searches of the Scopus database. The growth of research collaboration in various academic disciplines was also studied. There were 22 countries which produced over 2,000 papers in collaboration with researchers in Korea during the ten-year period between 2006 and 2015. The average of the average annual growth rate taken over these 22 countries was 12.9%. In 9 additional Asian, Latin American, and African countries, more rapid growth of international research collaboration was clearly seen. Though research collaboration is most active in the field of physics and astronomy with most countries, it was found that the growth of collaboration in medicine was most remarkable in Southeast Asian countries. It may be originated from the intimate relationship between Korea and Southeast Asia and the leadership of Korean physicians in that region.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Reflections on the Basic Manuscript Editors’ Training 2017 Hakbong Lee Science Editing.2017; 4(2): 93. CrossRef
The aim of this study was to analyze the bibliometric characteristics of publications from North Korea indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection from 1988 to 2016. We hypothesized that the main research area would be the physical sciences, and that the number of articles would continually increase over time. The Web of Science Core Collection was searched using the terms “North Korea” OR “Democratic People’s Republic of Korea” OR “DPRK” in the address field of the basic search on February 2, 2017. The country of the co-authors, affiliations, journals, annual number of publications, and research fields were analyzed. Additionally, the articles by North Korean authors only were analyzed for the same parameters. A total of 318 articles from North Korea were found. The most frequent countries of collaboration were China, Germany, and Australia. Kim Il Sung University produced the most articles. The main research fields were physics, mathematics, and materials science. The categories of the journal titles corresponded to the research fields. The rapid increase in the number of articles in 2015 and 2016 was remarkable, although this increase started from a very small baseline number of publications. The results of the analysis of the 46 articles published by North Korean authors only were equivalent to the results for the 318 articles presented above. Our hypotheses were confirmed. The surge of articles in 2015 and 2016 may represent the recent efforts by the North Korean government to emphasize scientific research and development. It is anticipated that the productivity of North Korean researchers in terms of publications in international journals will increase dramatically based on the above trends, although the publication baseline is very low.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Co-authorship network analysis of North Korean chemistry researchers based on issues of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering published from 2008 to 2022:
a bibliometric study Eunmi Park, Ho-Yeol Yoon Science Editing.2024; 11(1): 38. CrossRef
Analysis of Webometric Term in Scopus Database during 2000-2019 Yogesh Surwade, Hitendra J. Patil SSRN Electronic Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Mapping the development of North Korea's domestic nuclear research networks Philip Baxter, Justin V. Hastings, Philseo Kim, Man‐Sung Yim Review of Policy Research.2022; 39(2): 219. CrossRef
Military technology and the North Korean economy: evidence from time‐series data Jang C. Jin, Go En Chang Asian-Pacific Economic Literature.2022; 36(2): 106. CrossRef
Structural characteristics of institutional collaboration in North Korea analyzed through domestic publications Han Woo Park, Jungwon Yoon Scientometrics.2019; 119(2): 771. CrossRef
Network analysis of scientific collaboration in North Korea Hyung Wook Choi, Ye Jin Choi, Soon Kim Science Editing.2019; 6(1): 25. CrossRef
Bibliographic and content analysis of physics papers from North Korea indexed in the Scopus from 2005 to 2018 Kihong Kim, Yeonok Chung Science Editing.2019; 6(1): 35. CrossRef
Update: Bibliometric analysis of publications from North Korea indexed in the Web of
Science Core Collection from 1978 to July 2018 Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 119. CrossRef
Bibliometric and content analysis of medical articles in the PubMed database published by North Korean authors from 1997 to July 2017 Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh Science Editing.2017; 4(2): 70. CrossRef
ScienceCentral is a free or open access full-text archive of scientific society journal literature hosted by the Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies. It was launched in December 2013. We analyzed the number of articles deposited, page views by period, country of visitors, number of visitors, and entry point of visits. Descriptive statistics were presented. We also hypothesized that visitors accessed ScienceCentral mostly through Google and Google Scholar since ScienceCentral allows Googlebot to index it. The number of deposited articles was 19,419 from 124 journals in December 2016. The number of page views per month was 20,228 in December 2016. The top countries of visitors were South Korea (39.9%), the United States (13.26%), India (4.2%), China (3.4%), and Russia (3.2%). The average number of page views per article a month in December 2016 was 1.0. Google and Google Scholar were powerful referral sites to ScienceCentral. Except for direct visits to ScienceCentral, seven out of the top ten access sites to ScienceCentral were Google or Google Scholar sites from a variety of countries. Although the number of visitors and page views has increased continuously, the average number of page views per article a month has not increased.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The rapid internationalization of Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism as evidenced by journal metrics Sun Huh Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism.2017; 22(2): 77. CrossRef
How to Deal with Ethical Issues Involving Animal Experiments and Identifiable Photographs in Articles Published in Archives of Plastic Surgery Sun Huh Archives of Plastic Surgery.2017; 44(06): 475. CrossRef
In the field of international scholarly journal publishing, manuscript editing has been established as an essential component of the publication process. As the necessity of this process has increased, the Korean Council of Science Editors has consistently provided education for training professional manuscript editors, and has worked to implement a manuscript editor certification system. Starting in 2014, the Korean Council of Science Editors thoroughly conducted background research and advanced analysis in preparation for such a system. Subsequently, a committee of experts was formed to develop and simulate an examination for this certification. This process culminated in the first manuscript editor certification examination, which was held in November 2016 and resulted in 40 initial Korea Manuscript Editors Certification holders. Examinations for the Korea Manuscript Editors Certification are scheduled to be held annually. The establishment of this certification system will contribute to strengthening individual capacities and further developing science journal publication in Korea by expanding the field of manuscript editing. Ultimately, this system will contribute to the promotion of Korean scientific journals to the level of prominent international journals.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Presidential address: How to cope with the present environment of scholarly journal publishing Sun Huh Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 1. CrossRef
Search engines and software for manuscript editing Yeonwook Kim Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 88. CrossRef
Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research? Sun Huh Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524. CrossRef
Reflections on the Basic Manuscript Editors’ Training 2017 Hakbong Lee Science Editing.2017; 4(2): 93. CrossRef
How to successfully list a journal in the Social Science Citation Index or Science Citation Index Expanded Sun Huh Korean Journal of Medical Education.2017; 29(4): 221. CrossRef
Evolution of the intellectual structure of clothing and textiles literature Joon-Ho Seon, Seong Eun Kim, Hyun-Jung Lee, Kyu-Hye Lee The Research Journal of the Costume Culture.2019; 27(4): 299. CrossRef