Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Science Editing : Science Editing


Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Xin Bi 1 Article
Quality open access publishing and registration to Directory of Open Access Journals
Xin Bi
Sci Ed. 2017;4(1):3-11.   Published online February 20, 2017
  • 19,511 View
  • 306 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
With the fast development of open access publishing worldwide, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) as a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals, has been recognized for its high criteria in facilitating high quality open access scholarly publishing and used as the portal for accessing quality open access journals. While the numbers of journal application to be inclusion in DOAJ in Asia are kept increasing dramatically, many editors of these journals are not very clear about the idea or concept of the open access which have been embedded in the application form containing 58 questions falling into several different criteria categories. The very commonly seen misunderstanding of the required item, inaccurate or vague or incomplete and even missing information, poorly organized website, non-transparent process of publishing, especially no open access statement and copyright statement, or conflicts between the policy statements would cause much more communication between the reviewer and the editor and delay the completion of the review. This article gives an in depth introduction to DOAJ criteria and detailed introduction to the general process on how to register to DOAJ, suggestions based on application review also is given for journal editors to better prepare for this application. And it is the most important for editors to keep in mind that to be indexed by DOAJ is not just about filling a form, it is about truly change and adapt to best practices in open access publishing.


Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • An Altmetrics and citation analysis of selected predatory journals in library and information science field
    Ming Chen, Linzi Wang
    The Journal of Academic Librarianship.2022; 48(6): 102618.     CrossRef
  • Examining the Research Evolution on the Socio-Economic and Environmental Dimensions on University Social Responsibility
    Víctor Meseguer-Sánchez, Emilio Abad-Segura, Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña, Valentín Molina-Moreno
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(13): 4729.     CrossRef
  • Challenge of Ukrainian academic librarians in an evolving scholarly publishing landscape
    Serhii Nazarovets, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Maryna Nazarovets
    The Journal of Academic Librarianship.2019; 45(1): 9.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools
    Armen Yuri Gasparyan, Marlen Yessirkepov, Alexander A. Voronov, Anna M. Koroleva, George D. Kitas
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The DOAJ Spring Cleaning 2016 and What Was Removed—Tragic Loss or Good Riddance?
    Jan Erik Frantsvåg
    Publications.2019; 7(3): 45.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
    Sun Huh
    Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research's promotion to internationally competitive journal evidenced by journal metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research.2017; 6(2): 67.     CrossRef
  • Equality, equity, and reality of open access on scholarly information
    Jeong-Wook Seo, Hosik Chung, Tae-Sul Seo, Youngim Jung, Eun Seong Hwang, Cheol-Heui Yun, Hyungsun Kim
    Science Editing.2017; 4(2): 58.     CrossRef

Science Editing : Science Editing