- The evolution, benefits, and challenges of preprints and their interaction with journals
-
Pippa Smart
-
Sci Ed. 2022;9(1):79-84. Published online February 20, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.269
-
-
7,408
View
-
369
Download
-
11
Web of Science
-
17
Crossref
-
 Abstract
 PDF
- This article presents the growth and development of preprints to help authors, editors, and publishers understand and adopt appropriate strategies for incorporating preprints within their scholarly communication strategies. The article considers: preprint history and evolution, integration of preprints and journals, and the benefits and disadvantages, and challenges that preprints offer. The article discusses the two largest and most established preprint servers, arXiv.org (established in 1991) and SSRN (1994), the OSF (Open Science Foundation) initiative that supported preprint growth (2010), bioRxiv (2013), and medRxiv (2019). It then discusses six different levels of acceptance of preprints within journals: uneasy relationship, acceptance of preprint articles, encouraging authors to preprint their articles, active participation with preprints, submerger by reviewing preprints, and finally merger and overlay models. It is notable that most journals now accept submissions that have been posted as preprints. The benefits of preprints include fast circulation, priority publication, increased visibility, community feedback, and contribution to open science. Disadvantages include information overload, inadequate quality assurance, citation dilution, information manipulation and inflation of results. As preprints become mainstream it is likely that they will benefit authors but disadvantage publishers and journals. Authors are encouraged to preprint their own articles but to be cautious about using preprints as the basis for their own research. Editors are encouraged to develop preprint policies and be aware that double-blind review is not possible with preprinting of articles and that allowing citations to preprints is to be encouraged. In conclusion, journal-related stakeholders should consider preprints as an unavoidable development, taking into consideration both the benefits and disadvantages.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by  - Seeing the forest for the trees and the changing seasons in the vast land of scholarly publishing
Soo Jung Shin
Science Editing.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - To preprint or not to preprint: A global researcher survey
Rong Ni, Ludo Waltman
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2024; 75(6): 749. CrossRef - Open publishing of public health research in Africa: an exploratory investigation of the barriers and solutions
Pasipanodya Ian Machingura Ruredzo, Dominic Dankwah Agyei, Modibo Sangare, Richard F. Heller
Insights the UKSG journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Exploring the current dynamics of preprints
Raj Rajeshwar Malinda, Dipika Mishra, Ruchika Bajaj, Alin Khaliduzzaman
Current Medical Research and Opinion.2024; 40(6): 1047. CrossRef - Publishing Embargoes and Versions of Preprints: Impact on the Dissemination of Information
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Chun-Kai (Karl) Huang, Maryna Nazarovets
Open Information Science.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Accelerated acceptance time for preprint submissions: a comparative analysis based on PubMed
Dan Tian, Xin Liu, Jiang Li
Scientometrics.2024; 129(7): 3787. CrossRef - Are Preprints a Threat to the Credibility and Quality of Artificial Intelligence Literature in the ChatGPT Era? A Scoping Review and Qualitative Study
Michael Agyemang Adarkwah, A. Y. M. Atiquil Islam, Käthe Schneider, Rose Luckin, Michael Thomas, Jonathan Michael Spector
International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction.2024; : 1. CrossRef - A perspective on the Center for Open Science (COS) preprint servers
J. A. Teixeira da Silva
Science Editor and Publisher.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Recent Issues in Medical Journal Publishing and Editing Policies: Adoption of Artificial Intelligence, Preprints, Open Peer Review, Model Text Recycling Policies, Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing 4th Version, and Country Names in Titles
Sun Huh
Neurointervention.2023; 18(1): 2. CrossRef - Most Preprint Servers Allow the Publication of Opinion Papers
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Serhii Nazarovets
Open Information Science.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - The rise of preprints in earth sciences
Olivier Pourret, Daniel Enrique Ibarra
F1000Research.2023; 12: 561. CrossRef - The rise of preprints in earth sciences
Olivier Pourret, Daniel Enrique Ibarra
F1000Research.2023; 12: 561. CrossRef - Sharing the wealth: a proposal for discipline-based repositories of shared educational resources
Ellen Austin
Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education.2023; 27(4): 131. CrossRef - The experiences of COVID-19 preprint authors: a survey of researchers about publishing and receiving feedback on their work during the pandemic
Narmin Rzayeva, Susana Oliveira Henriques, Stephen Pinfield, Ludo Waltman
PeerJ.2023; 11: e15864. CrossRef - An attempt to explain the partial 'silent' withdrawal or retraction of a SAGE Advance preprint
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Publishing Research.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review
Amanda Jane Blatch-Jones, Alejandra Recio Saucedo, Beth Giddins, Robin Haunschild
PLOS ONE.2023; 18(9): e0291627. CrossRef - Dissemination of Registered COVID-19 Clinical Trials (DIRECCT): a cross-sectional study
Maia Salholz-Hillel, Molly Pugh-Jones, Nicole Hildebrand, Tjada A. Schult, Johannes Schwietering, Peter Grabitz, Benjamin Gregory Carlisle, Ben Goldacre, Daniel Strech, Nicholas J. DeVito
BMC Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
- The big picture: scholarly publishing trends 2014
-
Pippa Smart
-
Sci Ed. 2014;1(2):52-57. Published online August 18, 2014
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.52
-
-
33,415
View
-
194
Download
-
11
Web of Science
-
9
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
It is important for journal editors to keep up to date with the changes happening in the international journal environment to ensure that their own publications remain current and meet international expectations. Dramatic changes have taken place in the journals environment during the last two decades, frequently driven by technology but also by increased global participation in scholarly and scientific research and concern about the commercial influence on dissemination of knowledge. Technical solutions have attempted to address the growth in research but have sometimes added to the tsunami of information and increased the need to manage quality. To this end experiments with the traditional quality control and dissemination systems have been attempted, but news of improvements are frequently overshadowed by alarms about ethical problems. There is particular concern about some of the new publishers who are not adhering to established quality control and ethical practices. Within a potentially fragmenting system, however, there are also emerging collaborative projects helping to knit together the different elements of the publishing landscape to improve quality, linkages and access. -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by - Global trend of clinical biomarkers of health and disease during the period (1913–2021): systematic review and bibliometric analysis
Snezana M. Jovicic
African Journal of Urology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Predatory publishing through McCornarck’s information manipulation theory
Harry Kipkemoi Bett
Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.2020; 69(4/5): 331. CrossRef - Forecast of the Development of Russian Scientific Journals: The Publishers
O. V. Moskaleva, M. A. Akoev
Scholarly Research and Information.2020; 3(2-3): 131. CrossRef - English language policies in scientific journals: Signs of change in the field of economics
Ann C. Henshall
Journal of English for Academic Purposes.2018; 36: 26. CrossRef - How open access is crucial to the future of science: A reply
H. Charles Romesburg
The Journal of Wildlife Management.2017; 81(4): 567. CrossRef - Supply chain management 1982–2015: a review
Nasrin Asgari, Ehsan Nikbakhsh, Alex Hill, Reza Zanjirani Farahani
IMA Journal of Management Mathematics.2016; 27(3): 353. CrossRef - Topics of major current interest in scholarly editing and publishing based on the content analysis of selected journals
Yeonok Chung
Science Editing.2015; 2(2): 59. CrossRef - How Green Is This Paper?
Toby Miller
Culture Unbound.2015; 7(4): 588. CrossRef - What is the position ofClinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicinein its scholarly journal network based on journal metrics?
Sun Huh
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine.2014; 41(4): 147. CrossRef
|
KCSE
