- Preprint acceptance policies of Asian academic society journals in 2020
-
Ye Jin Choi, Hyung Wook Choi, Soon Kim
-
Sci Ed. 2021;8(1):10-17. Published online February 20, 2021
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.224
-
-
5,355
View
-
139
Download
-
6
Web of Science
-
7
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
In the current era of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the trend of sharing new research results through preprint platforms is receiving more attention from researchers than ever before. Preprints have been recognized as a primary and essential method to disseminate new findings faster than traditional publications. Therefore, it has become necessary for journals and editors to acknowledge these changes, prepare preprint policies, and notify authors accordingly. This study aimed to review the status of preprint policies of international publishers and Asian academic society journals.
Methods In total, 383 Asian academic society journals registered in Science Citation Index Expanded were selected as a dataset for analysis between December 11, 2020 and January 8, 2021. Three different parameters were investigated whether each journal had a preprint policy, whether journals allowed preprint manuscripts to be submitted, and whether preprint articles were allowed to be included in the references.
Results Among the 383 Asian academic society journals from 22 countries, only 28 journals accepted preprint manuscripts, and eight allowed the use of preprint manuscripts as references. Japan had the most journals that both had preprint policies and accepted preprint manuscripts, with 13 journals, followed by Korea with 10 journals.
Conclusion Despite the limitations of this study, the results show that editors and journal staff should understand the current preprint trend and try to prepare preprint policies that best meet the journals’ and authors’ interests.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Journal metrics, document network, and conceptual and social structures of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology from 2017 to July 2022: a bibliometric study
Sun Huh Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2023; 76(1): 3. CrossRef - The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review
Amanda Jane Blatch-Jones, Alejandra Recio Saucedo, Beth Giddins, Robin Haunschild PLOS ONE.2023; 18(9): e0291627. CrossRef - Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321. CrossRef - The evolution, benefits, and challenges of preprints and their interaction with journals
Pippa Smart Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 79. CrossRef - Congratulations on Child Health Nursing Research becoming a PubMed Central journal and reflections on its significance
Sun Huh Child Health Nursing Research.2022; 28(1): 1. CrossRef - Korean editors’ and researchers’ experiences with preprints and attitudes towards preprint policies
Hyun Jung Yi, Sun Huh Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 4. CrossRef - Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef
- Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in Korean academic society-published journals listed in Journal Citation Reports
-
Ye Jin Choi, Hyung Wook Choi, Soon Kim
-
Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):24-33. Published online February 20, 2020
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.186
-
-
7,160
View
-
137
Download
-
6
Web of Science
-
8
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
The “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” are of increasing importance in an open science environment as a way to increase the transparency and quality of academic society journals. However, little previous research has investigated the application of this new guideline in practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree to which this guideline is being applied by Korean academic society– published journals listed in Journal Citation Reports.
Methods The researchers investigated the homepages of 59 Korean academic society– published journals to evaluate whether they had adopted the 33 items listed in the guideline. Based on the information available on the journals’ homepages, each item was classified as ‘yes’ or ‘no’ within the four categories of basic journal information, publication ethics, copyright and archiving information, and profit model.
Results The basic journal information category was generally well-practiced, with the exceptions of the peer review process, readership, and author fees. The copyright and licensing information category was also well-practiced, with the exception of policies on posting accepted articles with third parties and archiving items. However, most items in the publication ethics category were not well practiced, with the exception of authorship and intellectual property. All items in the profit model category were infrequently implemented.
Conclusion These findings serve as a good indicator for Korean journal editors of areas for improvement. It may be helpful to review journals’ publication policies and homepages to comply with international publishing standards.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- The COPE / DOAJ / OASPA / WAME Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: A Critical Analysis
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Salim Moussa ETHICS IN PROGRESS.2024; 15(1): 130. CrossRef - The Application of Open Science Potentials in Research Processes: A Comprehensive Literature Review
Maryam Zarghani, Leila Nemati-Anaraki, Shahram Sedghi, Abdolreza Noroozi Chakoli, Anisa Rowhani-Farid Libri.2023; 73(2): 167. CrossRef - Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321. CrossRef - Congratulations on Child Health Nursing Research becoming a PubMed Central journal and reflections on its significance
Sun Huh Child Health Nursing Research.2022; 28(1): 1. CrossRef - Marking the inclusion of the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing in PubMed Central and strategies to be promoted to a top-tier journal in the nursing category
Sun Huh Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing.2022; 28(3): 165. CrossRef - Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef - The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021
Sun Huh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20. CrossRef - How Annals of Dermatology Has Improved the Scientific Quality and Ethical Standards of its Articles in the Two-Year Period since October 2018
Sun Huh Annals of Dermatology.2020; 32(5): 353. CrossRef
- Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in academic society published journals
-
Hyung Wook Choi, Ye Jin Choi, Soon Kim
-
Sci Ed. 2019;6(2):112-121. Published online August 19, 2019
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.171
-
-
7,366
View
-
136
Download
-
10
Web of Science
-
14
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
Four international associations, including the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, the Directory of Open Access Journals, the Committee on Publication Ethics, and the World Association of Medical Editors declared the third version of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” to ensure transparency and quality in journal publications. This study is aimed at assessing the guidelines from the journals’ websites manually.
Methods In this study, three researchers investigate the homepages of 781 academic society-published journals that are registered in the Science Citation Index Expanded and whether these journals are effectively adopting these new guidelines. In this paper, 33 items from the guidelines are examined. The 33 items are rearranged into four different categories: basic journal information; publication ethics; copyright and archiving information; and profit model. The researchers count yes or no after checking the adopting status on the journal homepage and dividing into four scales: 0% to 25% for is rarely practiced, 26% to 50% for is poorly practiced, 51% to 75% for is adequately practiced, and 76% to 100% for is well practiced.
Results Of the 33 items, 10 are found to be poorly or rarely practiced, including readership, data sharing, archiving policies, and profit model information.
Conclusion It could be the most up-to-date indicator of the current status of applying best practice guidelines. Society journal editors especially from Asia should evaluate their journals regarding “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing”.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Opening up to the open data
Prakash K. Dubey Journal of Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences.2024; 10(1): 1. CrossRef - The COPE / DOAJ / OASPA / WAME Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: A Critical Analysis
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Salim Moussa ETHICS IN PROGRESS.2024; 15(1): 130. CrossRef - Prestige of scholarly book publishers—An investigation into criteria, processes, and practices across countries
Eleonora Dagienė Research Evaluation.2023; 32(2): 356. CrossRef - The use of data repositories in dermatology
Umer Nadir, Loma Dave, Michael D. Yi, Farhana Ikmal Hisham, Murad Alam Archives of Dermatological Research.2023; 315(6): 1851. CrossRef - Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321. CrossRef - Cumplimiento de Estándares Internacionales en Publicaciones Arbitradas Académicas Mexicanas y Guatemaltecas
Humberto Emilio Aguilera Arévalo Revista Académica Sociedad del Conocimiento Cunzac.2022; 2(1): 89. CrossRef - Open Data Policies among Library and Information Science Journals
Brian Jackson Publications.2021; 9(2): 25. CrossRef - Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef - The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021
Sun Huh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20. CrossRef - Changes in bibliographic information associated with Korean scientific journals from 2011 to 2019
Yoon Joo Seo, Hye-Min Cho, Sun Huh Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 11. CrossRef - Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in Korean academic society-published journals listed in Journal Citation Reports
Ye Jin Choi, Hyung Wook Choi, Soon Kim Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 24. CrossRef - Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
Sun Huh Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238. CrossRef - How Annals of Dermatology Has Improved the Scientific Quality and Ethical Standards of its Articles in the Two-Year Period since October 2018
Sun Huh Annals of Dermatology.2020; 32(5): 353. CrossRef - Recent trends in medical journals’ data sharing policies and statements of data availability
Sun Huh Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(06): 493. CrossRef
- Network analysis of scientific collaboration in North Korea
-
Hyung Wook Choi, Ye Jin Choi, Soon Kim
-
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):25-34. Published online February 20, 2019
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.152
-
-
7,145
View
-
181
Download
-
6
Web of Science
-
7
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
Although North Korea invests in scientific research, few selected research results are published to international journals. However, the latest peaceful political developments around North Korea have increased concerns about how they will support international scientific cooperation. This study aims to analyze the scientific collaboration and intellectual structure of North Korean researchers.
Methods We conducted a co-word analysis with author keywords and author names using the Web of Science records for 1976–2018 to observe the changes in research trends in North Korea. The structure of the median centrality of words and the parallel nearest neighbor clustering methods were used to visualize the results.
Results The analysis of 55 final keywords confirms that the corresponding network is composed of 17 sub-clusters under four areas. As a result of the investigation of 56 final author names, the corresponding network is composed of 15 sub-clusters under four areas.
Conclusion As more accurate information is needed about collaboration partners to ensure successful cooperation, this analysis result can support getting an overview of North Korea’s research community and their research network.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Co-authorship network analysis of North Korean chemistry researchers based on issues of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering published from 2008 to 2022:
a bibliometric study
Eunmi Park, Ho-Yeol Yoon Science Editing.2024; 11(1): 38. CrossRef - Tracking North Korean economic transformation and trends in economic research
Justin V. Hastings, Haneol Lee Asia and the Global Economy.2023; 3(1): 100050. CrossRef - Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321. CrossRef - Mapping the development of North Korea's domestic nuclear research networks
Philip Baxter, Justin V. Hastings, Philseo Kim, Man‐Sung Yim Review of Policy Research.2022; 39(2): 219. CrossRef - Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef - A critical examination of international research conducted by North Korean authors: Increasing trends of collaborative research between China and North Korea
Eungi Kim, Eun Sil Kim Scientometrics.2020; 124(1): 429. CrossRef - Bibliometric analysis of research on the maize based on top papers during 2009-2019
Bao-Zhong Yuan, Jie Sun COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management.2020; 14(1): 75. CrossRef
|