Science Editing

Science Editing is indexed in the Scopus: Kihong Kim; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):1-1. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.110

8,307 View
218 Download
3 Web of Science
1 Crossref

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Presidential address: How to cope with the present environment of scholarly journal publishing
Sun Huh
Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 1. CrossRef

Journal Article Tag Suite subset and Schematron: achieving the right balance: Alexander B. Schwarzman; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):2-15. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.111

10,293 View
183 Download
6 Web of Science
6 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Ensuring that published content adheres to the publisher’s business and style rules requires the implementation of quality-control solutions that encompass the entire enterprise, including vendors and in-house staff. The solutions must span the entire life cycle of the manuscript, from extensible markup language conversion to production to post-publication enhancements. Two techniques that may help in achieving this goal are developing Schematron and making a Journal Article Tag Suite subset. Both come with costs: Schematron change management requires development and maintenance of an extensive testbase; making a subset requires comprehensive content analysis and the knowledge of the publishing program’s direction. Achieving the right balance between the two techniques may reduce the costs associated with them.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
Sun Huh
Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238. CrossRef
Reflections as 2020 comes to an end: the editing and educational environment during the COVID-19 pandemic, the power of Scopus and Web of Science in scholarly publishing, journal statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 44. CrossRef
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions will be accepted for inclusion in Scopus
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 2. CrossRef
Is it possible to foster first-rate publishers through a journal publishing cooperative in Korea?
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(01): 3. CrossRef
Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
Sun Huh
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524. CrossRef
Journal Metrics of Infection & Chemotherapy and Current Scholarly Journal Publication Issues
Sun Huh
Infection & Chemotherapy.2018; 50(3): 219. CrossRef

Overview of journal metrics: Kihong Kim, Yeonok Chung; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):16-20. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.112

15,148 View
433 Download
21 Web of Science
18 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Various kinds of metrics used for the quantitative evaluation of scholarly journals are reviewed. The impact factor and related metrics including the immediacy index and the aggregate impact factor, which are provided by the Journal Citation Reports, are explained in detail. The Eigenfactor score and the article influence score are also reviewed. In addition, journal metrics such as CiteScore, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, SCImago Journal Rank, h-index, and g-index are discussed. Limitations and problems that these metrics have are pointed out. We should be cautious to rely on those quantitative measures too much when we evaluate journals or researchers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The introspections of contemporary business research: a call for scientific creativity
Kuldeep Singh
Society and Business Review.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Towards a new paradigm for ‘journal quality’ criteria: a scoping review
Mina Moradzadeh, Shahram Sedghi, Sirous Panahi
Scientometrics.2023; 128(1): 279. CrossRef
Recommendations and guidelines for creating scholarly biomedical journals: A scoping review
Jeremy Y. Ng, Kelly D. Cobey, Saad Ahmed, Valerie Chow, Sharleen G. Maduranayagam, Lucas J. Santoro, Lindsey Sikora, Ana Marusic, Daniel Shanahan, Randy Townsend, Alan Ehrlich, Alfonso Iorio, David Moher, Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh
PLOS ONE.2023; 18(3): e0282168. CrossRef
A multidimensional journal evaluation framework based on the Pareto‐dominated set measured by the Manhattan distance
Xinxin Xu, Ziqiang Zeng, Yurui Chang
Learned Publishing.2023; 36(4): 619. CrossRef
Journal quality criteria: Measurement and significance
O. V. Kirillova, E. V. Tikhonova
Science Editor and Publisher.2022; 7(1): 12. CrossRef
Bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence algorithms used for microbial fuel cell research
Luis Erick Coy-Aceves, Benito Corona-Vasquez
Water Practice and Technology.2022; 17(10): 2071. CrossRef
Predicting the citation count and CiteScore of journals one year in advance
William L. Croft, Jörg-Rüdiger Sack
Journal of Informetrics.2022; 16(4): 101349. CrossRef
The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20. CrossRef
Kind Attention to the Altitude of Altmetrics
Shekar Shobana
Brazilian Dental Journal.2020; 31(5): 457. CrossRef
Comments on “Scientificity and H-Index.”
Ali Yavuz KARAHAN
Acta Medica Alanya.2020; 4(2): 203. CrossRef
Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics
Ernesto Roldan-Valadez, Shirley Yoselin Salazar-Ruiz, Rafael Ibarra-Contreras, Camilo Rios
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).2019; 188(3): 939. CrossRef
CiteScore metrics: Creating journal metrics from the Scopus citation index
Chris James, Lisa Colledge, Wim Meester, Norman Azoulay, Andrew Plume
Learned Publishing.2019; 32(4): 367. CrossRef
High Impact and Highly Cited Peer-Reviewed Journal Article Publications by Canadian Occupational Therapy Authors: A Bibliometric Analysis
Ted Brown, Yuh-Shan Ho, Sharon A. Gutman
Occupational Therapy In Health Care.2019; 33(4): 329. CrossRef
Corrective factors for author- and journal-based metrics impacted by citations to accommodate for retractions
Judit Dobránszki, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Scientometrics.2019; 121(1): 387. CrossRef
A New Metric for the Analysis of the Scientific Article Citation Network
Livia Lin-Hsuan Chang, Frederick Kin Hing Phoa, Junji Nakano
IEEE Access.2019; 7: 132027. CrossRef
Bibliographic measures of top-tier finance and information systems journals
Thomas Krueger, Jack Shorter
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.2019; 12(5): 841. CrossRef
Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
Sun Huh
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137. CrossRef
Journal Metrics of Infection & Chemotherapy and Current Scholarly Journal Publication Issues
Sun Huh
Infection & Chemotherapy.2018; 50(3): 219. CrossRef

Publication contracts and their legal interpretation in Korea: Seung Jong Oh; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):21-25. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.113

9,270 View
179 Download

Abstract PDF: This study intends to help editors and publishers understand what to be aware of when signing a publishing contract in Korea. The legal interpretation of publishing rights may vary depending on the type of contract. It is vital for publishers to understand the different characteristics of each type of contract: author-publisher agreements, establishment of publishing rights, transfer of the author’s economic rights, and lump-sum agreements. Lump-sum agreements are a unique practice common in Korea, in which intellectual copyright is transferred upon a one-time lump-sum payment. Decisions regarding the infringement of publication rights in a given case will be rendered in accordance with the specific aspects of the relevant type of publication rights, and the work in question must be reviewed to determine whether it shows substantial similarity or sameness in order to prepare for any potential issues. Meanwhile, in Korea, electronic publishing requires an additional agreement separate from the printing publication agreement, but regulations regarding electronic publishing shall be confirmed through international agreements after considering the specific statutes and practices of publication in each country, as legal statutes and their interpretation may vary widely. Editors and publishers of academic papers and books must be aware of the various types of publishing contracts in practice.

Open access full-text databases in Asian countries: Tae-Sul Seo; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):26-31. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.114

10,405 View
237 Download
7 Web of Science
6 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Open access promotion methods are generally divided into the ‘gold road’ and the ‘green road.’ Asian countries most commonly focus on the gold road while others focus on the green road. According to data from the Directory of Open Access Journal and the Directory of Open Access Repositories, Indonesia has the largest number of open access journals in the world, while Japan has the third largest number of institutional repositories. In contrast, in Korea, the extensible markup language services of the original text of journal articles are more popular than other Asian countries. In this article, the current status of open access in Asian countries is investigated, and typical open access journal service platforms in Asian countries are reviewed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Open access initiatives in European countries: analysis of trends and policies
Mohammad Nazim, Raj Kumar Bhardwaj
Digital Library Perspectives.2023; 39(3): 371. CrossRef
Proposal for the development of a national open access database in Vietnam and comparison with other Asian countries’ national literature databases
Loc My Thi Nguyen, Tien-Trung Nguyen, Thanh Thi Nghiem, Hien Thu Thi Le, Thao Phuong Thi Trinh, Thuan Van Pham, Thanh Chi Nguyen, Linh Khanh Hoang, Trung Tran
Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 55. CrossRef
Otwarty dostęp w krajach globalnego Południa
Małgorzata Glinicka
Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej - Studia Informacyjne.2020; 58(1(115)): 56. CrossRef
CJK Languages or English: Languages Used by Academic Journals in China, Japan, and Korea
Xiaomei Liu, Xiaotian Chen
Journal of Scholarly Publishing.2019; 50(3): 201. CrossRef
Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools
Armen Yuri Gasparyan, Marlen Yessirkepov, Alexander A. Voronov, Anna M. Koroleva, George D. Kitas
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Latest trends in innovative global scholarly journal publication and distribution platforms
Soon Kim, Eunkyung Chung, Jae Yun Lee
Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 100. CrossRef

Language policy and the disengagement of the international academic elite: John Harbord; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):32-38. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.115

13,291 View
217 Download
5 Web of Science
2 Crossref

Abstract PDF

This paper explores the phenomena of academic multiliteracy (the habit of writing academically in more than one language) and of L2 monoliteracy (that of only writing academically in a language that is not one’s own) and their impact on policy. Based on interviews and surveys conducted with 33 multiliterate and 15 L2 monoliterate scholars connected to one university in Central Europe between 2010 and 2014, I show how incentives to publish in English constructed by educational policies often push ambitious young researchers whose first language is not English away from engaging in academic and societal debates in their first language community. They may thus disengage from the national community, with negative consequences for the interaction between global and local that is essential for good governance. To overcome the difficulty young scholars encounter in writing in their native languages, they should be taught writing both in their native language and in English. Furthermore, university and state policies should reward scholars for writing not only for the international community but also for local society.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

EMI, power and expressivism
René Gabriëls, Robert Wilkinson
Journal of English-Medium Instruction.2024; 3(1): 1. CrossRef
Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
Sun Huh
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137. CrossRef

Authors’ perspectives on academic publishing: initial observations from a large-scale global survey: Basil D’Souza, Sneha Kulkarni, Clarinda Cerejo; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):39-43. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.116

12,667 View
244 Download
12 Web of Science
7 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Authors are at the heart of academic publishing, but their voices are underrepresented in discussions about improving the academic publishing system. To understand the viewpoints of authors on various aspects of academic publishing and the challenges they face, we developed a large-scale survey entitled “Author perspectives on the academic publishing process” and made it available in December 2016. The survey has received 8,795 responses; this paper is based on the interim results drawn from 5,293 survey responses, and presents some interesting and thought-provoking trends that were observed in the authors’ responses, such as their interpretation of plagiarism and decisive factors in journal selection, as well as their thoughts on what needs to change in the publishing system for it to be more author-friendly. Some of the most important findings of the survey were: (1) the majority of the authors found manuscript preparation to be the most challenging task in the publication process, (2) the impact factor of a journal was reported to be the most important consideration for journal selection, (3) most authors found journal guidelines to be incomplete, (4) major gaps existed in author-journal communication, and (5) although awareness of ethics was high, awareness of good publication practice standards was low. Moreover, more than half of the participants indicated that among areas for improvement in the publishing system, they would like to see changes in the time it takes to publish a paper, the peer review process, and the fairness and objectivity of the publication process. These findings indicate the necessity of making the journal publication process more author-centered and smoothing the way for authors to get published.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Factors affecting authors' manuscript submission behaviour: A systematic review
Xiaoting Xu, Juan Xie, Jianjun Sun, Ying Cheng
Learned Publishing.2023; 36(2): 285. CrossRef
Authors' choice between parent and mirror journals of Elsevier
Sumiko Asai
Learned Publishing.2023; 36(2): 299. CrossRef
Video or perish? An analysis of video abstract author guidelines
Jianxin Liu
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.2022; 54(2): 230. CrossRef
Why consistent, clear, and uniform instructions for authors are required
Jean Iwaz
Science Editing.2022; 9(2): 142. CrossRef
Characteristics of high research performance authors in the field of library and information science and those of their articles
Yu-Wei Chang
Scientometrics.2021; 126(4): 3373. CrossRef
Impact of a new institutional medical journal on professional identity development and academic cultural change: A qualitative study
Victoria Hayes, Emma Williams, Kathleen M. Fairfield, Carolyne Falank, Dina McKelvy, Robert Bing‐You
Learned Publishing.2021; 34(4): 602. CrossRef
Are articles in library and information science (LIS) journals primarily contributed to by LIS authors?
Yu-Wei Chang
Scientometrics.2019; 121(1): 81. CrossRef

Comparison of the patterns of duplicate articles between KoreaMed and PubMed journals published from 2004 to 2009 according to the categories of duplicate publications: Soo Young Kim, Chong Woo Bae, Hye-Min Cho, Sun Huh; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):44-48. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.117

9,450 View
188 Download
2 Web of Science
3 Crossref

Abstract PDF

This study compared the patterns of duplicate articles between KoreaMed and PubMed journals based on a division of duplicate publications into the 4 categories of ‘copy,’ ‘salami’ (fragmentation), ‘imalas’ (disaggregation), and ‘others,’ as well as in terms of the 11 subcategories suggested by Bae et al., which further elaborate on those 4 main categories. We hypothesized that these 2 groups of articles would show different patterns of duplication. Duplicate publications were identified in a random sample of 5% of the articles from the KoreaMed database published between 2004 and 2009, while all articles with the publication type of ‘duplicate publication’ were selected from PubMed over the same period. The selected articles were classified based on the 4 categories and 11 subcategories of duplicate publications, and the data from the 2 groups were compared. A total of 108 articles were selected from KoreaMed and 45 articles were obtained from PubMed. The category of copy was the most common in both databases. The next most frequent pattern was imalas (disaggregation). Pattern of duplicate publication between 2 databases showed no correlation (P = 0.8754). Although the 108 articles from KoreaMed were allocated to all 11 Bae et al.’s subcategories, those from PubMed were allocated to only 8. The above results showed that the articles in the 2 databases had different patterns of duplication, as defined in terms of the 11 subcategories. The use of these 11 subcategories will help journal editors to develop an appropriate framework for considering a variety of duplication types.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Recent Issues in Medical Journal Publishing and Editing Policies: Adoption of Artificial Intelligence, Preprints, Open Peer Review, Model Text Recycling Policies, Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing 4th Version, and Country Names in Titles
Sun Huh
Neurointervention.2023; 18(1): 2. CrossRef
Analysis of duplicated publications in Russian journals
Yury V. Chekhovich, Andrey V. Khazov
Journal of Informetrics.2022; 16(1): 101246. CrossRef
How many retracted articles indexed in KoreaMed were cited 1 year after retraction notification
Soo Young Kim, Hyun Jung Yi, Hye-Min Cho, Sun Huh
Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 122. CrossRef

Arbitral action and preventive methods against predatory journal practice: Sung Pil Park, Eric Yong Joong Lee, Ji Hee Suh; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):49-52. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.118

12,186 View
231 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Abstract PDF

As open access model of journal publication increases, predatory journals, which deceive scholars to publish journals in fake database websites and exploit them for publishing fee, is also increasing. There are two types of predatory journals. First, journal hijacking and cybersquatting generally create fake database website by mimicking authentic database website, thereby defrauding scholars for publication fee. Second, journal phishing use scam emails to steal scholars’ personal information. If scholars suffered damage from predatory journals, scholars can take either arbitral or judicial actions. Arbitral action follows arbitrational resolution process termed Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy. Scholars can join Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy proceeding with legal entity that has right to authentic database website, which will result in cancellation or transfer of fake database website. In contrast, scholars can take judicial action under Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which may help scholars to recover an actual monetary damage from predatory journals. Nonetheless, taking precaution to avoid predatory journals is the best course of action, rather than going through arduous cure procedures. Scholars may prevent predatory journals by carefully examining fake database website names or email addresses, or observing unreasonable number of published article issues in predatory journal websites.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

How to respond to and what to do for papers published in predatory journals?
Aamir Raoof Memon
Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 146. CrossRef

Citation performance of Indonesian scholarly journals indexed in Scopus from Scopus and Google Scholar: Lukman Lukman, Yan Rianto, Shidiq Al Hakim, Irene M Nadhiroh, Deden Sumirat Hidayat; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):53-58. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.119

13,258 View
318 Download
3 Web of Science
4 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Citation frequency is an important factor for estimating the quality of a scientific journal, and the number of citations that an academic paper receives is often used as a measure of its scientific impact. This study aimed to characterize the citation performance of scientific journals published by Indonesian publishers that have been indexed in Scopus by analyzing the number of citations available in the Scopus database and Google Scholar. The results of the study identified 30 Indonesian journals that have been Scopus-indexed, of which 22 were listed in SCImago Journal Rank up to October 2017. Journals in the engineering field were the most cited, with 2,427 citations, including 930 self-citations. A large proportion of the citations were of recently-founded journals. The mean proportional difference in the citation frequency between Scopus and Google Scholar was 14.71%.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Examining the Effect of Innovative Behavior, and the Role of Contingency Plan on HEIs Effective Teaching
Otto Berman Sihite, Poltak Sinaga, Dylmoon Hidayat, Rosdiana Sijabat
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental.2024; 18(5): e05178. CrossRef
Indonesian Scientists’ Behavior Relative to Research Data Governance in Preventing WMD-Applicable Technology Transfer
Lindung Parningotan Manik, Zaenal Akbar, Aris Yaman, Ariani Indrawati
Publications.2022; 10(4): 50. CrossRef
Evolution of the intellectual structure of clothing and textiles literature
Joon-Ho Seon, Seong Eun Kim, Hyun-Jung Lee, Kyu-Hye Lee
The Research Journal of the Costume Culture.2019; 27(4): 299. CrossRef
Why and how do we keep editing local medical journals in an era of information overload?
Viera Wardhani, Sam Mathew, Jeong-Wook Seo, Komang G. Wiryawan, Vivi Setiawaty, Burmaajav Badrakh
Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 150. CrossRef

Reviving a scientific journal: challenges and strategies: Jose Isagani Janairo; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):59-61. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.120

9,415 View
230 Download
3 Web of Science
2 Crossref

Abstract PDF

The revival of a scientific journal presents unique challenges in comparison with starting a new journal. In this case study, the experiences encountered in the recent revival of the Manila Journal of Science are outlined and discussed. The Manila Journal of Science is a general science journal published by De La Salle University, Philippines. The challenges faced during the revival of the journal included competition for submissions, restricted budget allocations, peer review, and improving the journal’s reputation. Several strategies were adopted to address these challenges, and the journal’s performance thus far is promising.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Internal affairs: the fate of authors from the University of the Philippines accused of plagiarism, 1990s to 2010s
Miguel Paolo P. Reyes, Joel F. Ariate
Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 128. CrossRef
Why and how do we keep editing local medical journals in an era of information overload?
Viera Wardhani, Sam Mathew, Jeong-Wook Seo, Komang G. Wiryawan, Vivi Setiawaty, Burmaajav Badrakh
Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 150. CrossRef

The international reach of Crossref: Vanessa Fairhurst; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):62-65. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.121

10,295 View
176 Download
4 Web of Science
3 Crossref

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
Jae Hwa Chang
Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69. CrossRef
Crossref at 20 years: what do the community need?
Rachael Lammey
Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 125. CrossRef
Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377. CrossRef

Sex and gender-related issues in biomedical science: Yong Sung Kim; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):66-69. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.122

9,394 View
197 Download
4 Web of Science
4 Crossref

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Adherence to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors–recommended gender equity policy in nursing journals listed in MEDLINE or PubMed Central: a descriptive study
Eun Jeong Ko, Geum Hee Jeong
Science Editing.2024; 11(1): 33. CrossRef
Shedding light on biological sex differences and microbiota–gut–brain axis: a comprehensive review of its roles in neuropsychiatric disorders
Parnian Shobeiri, Amirali Kalantari, Antônio L. Teixeira, Nima Rezaei
Biology of Sex Differences.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Sex and gender differences in community-acquired pneumonia
Bernadette Corica, Francesco Tartaglia, Tania D’Amico, Giulio Francesco Romiti, Roberto Cangemi
Internal and Emergency Medicine.2022; 17(6): 1575. CrossRef
Sex Differences in Gut Microbiota
Yong Sung Kim, Tatsuya Unno, Byung-Yong Kim, Mi-Sung Park
The World Journal of Men's Health.2020; 38(1): 48. CrossRef

Life as an editor: developing a domestic journal to an international journal: Dae-Myung Jue; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):70-72. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.123

8,550 View
198 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Why and how do we keep editing local medical journals in an era of information overload?
Viera Wardhani, Sam Mathew, Jeong-Wook Seo, Komang G. Wiryawan, Vivi Setiawaty, Burmaajav Badrakh
Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 150. CrossRef

How Asian publishers can compete with publishers in Europe and North America: Sun Huh; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):73-75. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.124

7,842 View
143 Download
2 Web of Science
2 Crossref

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions will be accepted for inclusion in Scopus
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 2. CrossRef
How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
Sun Huh
Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95. CrossRef

Previous issues